User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2012/May

Regarding the social liberal ection

I'm surprised that the Radical civic Union and the Australian Democarts got removed. the Australian democarst article defines it as social liberal, while the link to th eradical Civic union describes it as a social liberal party. I think its wrong to remove these parties.zictor23 (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

I will reply on the article talk page. TFD (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.

One man's freedom fighter (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Use of the term 'socially liberal'

Hi, TFD. I've posted a comment on the talk page of the social liberalism article that I would be grateful if you could reply to. Many thanks. DistractionActivity (talk) 11:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Falkland Islands". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 May 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Falkland Islands, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Lord Roem (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

War on Women

I see you participated in last month's AfD for "War on Women"; that article was reinstated yesterday.--24dot (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quick Note, War on Women has been renominated for Deletion--209.6.69.227 (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/War_on_Women_(2nd_nomination)--209.6.69.227 (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit during RfC

I ask you to self-revert your BOLD edit on which an RfC has already been started. Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:BRD

You are the one being bold in the BRD process. The other editor you just saw making an edit to the article is not the one you should be reverting to start off the BRD process, you do not revert other people's edits simply to provoke discussion, you edit the article yourself to improve it. BRD is intended for dead talkpages, or seemingly endless discussions that have not resulted in any real improvements to the article. Kindly self-revert - as you are engaging in a quite deliberate misuse of Wikipedia policies. Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

disruptive edit

you have purposely re-added an off-topic comment [1] about a user to the talk page of an article, plz self revert, or explain why the comment belong there instead of my talk page. Darkstar1st (talk) 04:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

You should not remove comments by other editors . If you believe it to be off-topic, then you should discuss the matter with the other editor. Also, you should accept that the purpose of the discussion pages is to discuss improvements to articles, not to soapbox about your personal views on socialism, fascism = socialism, Obama is a socialist, etc. TFD (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Classical liberalism dispute

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zac Gochenour (talk • contribs) 21:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC)