Talk:Survivor: San Juan del Sur: Difference between revisions
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
How is it biased and terrible? They're all cited sources from legitimate outlets of reviewing the season. You're basically saying the reception should always be evened out to "please everyone" even if the season is universally panned. You don't see this happening for One World, or Nicaragua, or Thailand, or other universally-panned seasons. [[Special:Contributions/169.231.58.247|169.231.58.247]] ([[User talk:169.231.58.247|talk]]) 06:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
How is it biased and terrible? They're all cited sources from legitimate outlets of reviewing the season. You're basically saying the reception should always be evened out to "please everyone" even if the season is universally panned. You don't see this happening for One World, or Nicaragua, or Thailand, or other universally-panned seasons. [[Special:Contributions/169.231.58.247|169.231.58.247]] ([[User talk:169.231.58.247|talk]]) 06:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
And these vandals aren't simply trying to add other sources in defense of their views of the season, they're just trying to denigrate the sources that are already there with personal attacks against Mr. Ross. That's certainly not helping the situation. [[Special:Contributions/169.231.58.247|169.231.58.247]] ([[User talk:169.231.58.247|talk]]) 06:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:10, 16 December 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Survivor: San Juan del Sur article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Television: Episode coverage Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Central America Start‑class | ||||||
|
Tribe names
The tribe names for the upcoming season are Coyopa and Hunahpu, and the designated tribe colors are for Coyopa and for Hunahpu. [1] ApprenticeFan work 02:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Second TC votes
There are four "unknown" votes. Two are obvious but unsourced (Josh and Jaclyn) and two are unclear and unsourced (Alec and Dale). None of these votes can/should be filled in, until a reliable source (e.g., CBS or Jeff Probst) reveals them in some form or another. I have put a note in the voting history cells for these votes noting that they have not been revealed. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- When comparing episode five's votes with episode's two initial vote, there are two Baylor votes that look almost identical. Since Josh and Jaclyn's votes were explained/revealed, and Alec switched tribes, I believe that Dale voted for Baylor at Coyopa's second tribal council before the re-vote. There is no way to source this, but the tweet question was very confusing to begin with, and the almost identical handwriting is almost a sure way to ensure that Dale voted for Baylor and Alec voted for Val. The votes for "Baylor" in episode 2's first TC, episode 3's TC, and episode 5's TC all closely resemble each other. The only Coyopa member at those three tribal councils, whose vote was once a mystery, was Dale. SMSstopper0913 23:25, 22 October 2014
- This is speculation where the only proof is handwriting, which is very little. The tweet from Dale is solid evidence and a very straight forward answer. He voted for Val. CCamp2013 (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Episode Titles
Discussion
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Im not sure if this has been mentioned on another season or not, but is there a way to name who said the episode title? CCamp2013 (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Maybe like this:
I oppose this. It is more trivia than useful. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 02:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I wasn't planning on commenting here but CCamp2013 seems to be looking for additional opinions, so I'll add mine. I'm also opposed to the idea of adding this information. I fully agree that it's very trivial information and has no effect on the episode. I understand Amazing Race does it but I don't agree with it on their articles either. Gloss 03:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC) |
Resolved, We came to a consensus that it is strongly OPPOSED and is trivial to put who said each title of each episode. CCamp2013 (talk) 02:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Question from a stupid person
All I see is stribe|Coyopa for example, so how does Wikipedia knows what colour to add? May I know where is the code to tell Wikipedia what colour to add? 108.162.157.141 (talk) 05:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Stribe is the template that holds the code that automatically fills in a predetermined colour (and, if not overwritten, name) based on an input (the tribe name). There's Template:stribe/name to determine what shows up when each tribe name is entered (this is most useful for multi-word tribe names like Foa Foa, or Moto Maji) and Template:stribe/color which, based on the name, holds the associated colour. Hope this helped! - Katanin (talk) 05:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Reluctant Request for the Page to be Locked
The ridiculously high, and sudden, amount of vandalism occurring in the "Reception" section should be enough reason for it. I'm not sure if the page should be unlocked for the finale, but something must be done to prevent any further vandalism from multiple IP's to the same section, with the same general changes proving that this is probably just one user with multiple IP's. Nevertheless, it'd be much easier than just constant reverts. 169.231.58.247 (talk) 04:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Or maybe you could just make that section be less biased and terrible so they don't have to fix it anymore? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.125.197 (talk) 05:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
How is it biased and terrible? They're all cited sources from legitimate outlets of reviewing the season. You're basically saying the reception should always be evened out to "please everyone" even if the season is universally panned. You don't see this happening for One World, or Nicaragua, or Thailand, or other universally-panned seasons. 169.231.58.247 (talk) 06:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
And these vandals aren't simply trying to add other sources in defense of their views of the season, they're just trying to denigrate the sources that are already there with personal attacks against Mr. Ross. That's certainly not helping the situation. 169.231.58.247 (talk) 06:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)