User talk:Kges1901

Welcome

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 07:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

C-STEM

Hi, I'm CSTEMWiki. It's my first time ever doing a Wikipedia page so the things I typed seems to be promotional. Can you quote the sentences or areas that it may seem to be promotional? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSTEMWiki (talk • contribs) 20:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Mz7. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, EdgewoodAve.com, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Webster92109 responding to your message on All About Vision

Hi. I further edited the All About Vision page by removing superlatives and adding references. I hope that helps. Webster92109 (talk) 22:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webster92109 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Additional All About Vision Feedback

Hi. I'd appreciate any constructive criticism you can offer, although the page I wrote has already been deleted. I reviewed other medical website pages before writing mine, to get an idea of how to do a better job than what exists. I'm not sure how pages like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_Advisor and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renal_%26_Urology_News and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_News_Today have a place in Wikipedia. I believe I offered substantially more information, but clearly my effort was still lacking in some way, and I'd love to know how. Thanks in advance for your input. Webster92109 (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Review for Vizidrix.com

I would appreciate a re-evaluation of the speed deletion recommendation. I'm not terribly familiar with the process so any information that would help meet terms would also be appreciated.

Vizidrix (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)my talk page

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets

Hello Kges1901. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Demon's Souls characters, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 03:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Promotional message on Zeek page

Hi, I'm yofisimon> You instantly ask for the speed deletion of the Zeek page I made, protesting a promotional message. I don't see any kind of promotional message, but if something in the page has to be removed, quote me it and it will be removed instantly. Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yofisimon (talk • contribs) 14:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi there. Thank you for patrolling new pages. However, after a review of some of your patrols and taking into account that you are very new here with fewer than 300 edits, I think it would help you to review some of our policies and guidelines concerning deletion and new page rewieving, before you do any more patrolling. The information you need is found essentially at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION, but if you need any help don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page although I may be a b it slow to respond for the moment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Hari vishnu kamath, Kges1901.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This article should not have been unreviewed before addressing the WP:COPYVIO issue.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi there, can you please let me know what do you mean by "grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling". it was a stub article and I don't see any grammar mistake in it. Vaidyasr (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Potentialife

Hi Kges1901

Thanks for your note - and the work you do. In this case I don't think its an appropriate deletion tag - Potentialife is already very significant in its impact despite only launching to market recently. It has been founded by two of the leading leadership experts in the world and has been especially designed to deliver a way of changing behavior based on science to make people happier and more successful. I find it hard to think of something more significant ! Let me know if you require any more details, Best and great day, Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcj1988 (talk • contribs) 11:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi there. Thank you for patrolling new pages. However, after a further review of some of your patrols and taking into account that you are still very new here with fewer than 500 edits, I am asking you now to review some of our policies and guidelines concerning deletion and new page rewieving, before you do any more patrolling. The information you need is found essentially at WP:NPP and WP:DELETION, but if you need any help don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page although I may be a bit slow to respond for the moment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

I remove all talk sections so please do not remove our college page

Hello

First I thank you for you review our college page and aware me the errors so i remove on urgent basis. I got the exact error and I delete talk sections so now our college article is fine and well update from me so kindly do not delete the page (Universal Business School - India) Regards Mayur System Admin Universal business School

SummerSlam

Please move Summerslam (2015) to SummerSlam 2015. At first you must link SummerSlam (2015) from other pages. Ikhtiar H (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry I meant to remove to SummerSlam (2015). Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Danish Irshad

--Idanish (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC) hello I saw that you Patrol my first post the article about Danish Irshad.

Danish Irshad is a Pakistani Urdu Columnist work in different news blogs and wrote different articles.

please remove the mark of deletion.

New Page Patrol

Hi there. Thank you for patrolling new pages. However, after noticing more of your of your patrols today I am asking you now to stop patrolling new pages until you have reviewed the instructions at WP:NPP. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Girish lad

Hello Kges1901, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Girish lad, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Specifically, the page was speedy deleted previously, the criteria you gave was it was deleted via deletion discussion (such as articles for deletion). This was not the case so it was not eligible under the criterion you gave, however it was eligible under a different criterion. Thank you,

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Jalalkuduk District, Kges1901.

Unfortunately Happiest persoN has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Please STOP patrolling new pages until you have reviewed the instructions at WP:NPP properly Happiest persoN (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Happiest persoN's talk page.

• I noticed and removed an incorrect speedy deletion tag you placed on Aliens Group. I second the request for you to please stop tagging new pages without fully understanding the process.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Rotogrinders

Hey, I was following the suggestions of another Admin who had triggered the original deleltion of the Rotogrinders entry on what to add to get the entry re-created properly - The reason for deletion was notability that was being questioned. I expanded the article to reference the companies partnership with NBC sports, it's 10,000+ membership and it's citations by Forbes Magazine as proof of notability as suggested by that admin. Did I miss something ? Jeremypenguin (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)