Jump to content

Insubordination: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Reverting vandalism by 71.191.217.134
Line 1: Line 1:
{{globalize/US|date=July 2013}}
{{globalize/US|date=July 2013}}


'''Insubordination''' is the act of willfully [[obedience (human behavior)|disobeying]] one's superior. Refusing to perform an action that is unethical or illegal is not insubordination so long as one is not a [[whistleblower]]. Questioning the scope of authority of the person issuing the order is insubordination if it turns out that the person had the authority to give such orders.
'''Insubordination''' is the act of willfully [[obedience (human behavior)|disobeying]] one's superior. Refusing to perform an action that is unethical or illegal is not insubordination; neither is refusing to perform an action that is not within the scope of authority of the person issuing the order.{{citation needed|date=February 2014}}


Insubordination is generally a punishable offense in [[hierarchical organization]]s which depend on people lower in the [[chain of command]] doing what they are expected to do.
Insubordination is generally a punishable offense in [[hierarchical organization]]s which depend on people lower in the [[chain of command]] doing what they are expected to do.

Revision as of 13:41, 27 January 2015

Template:Globalize/US

Insubordination is the act of willfully disobeying one's superior. Refusing to perform an action that is unethical or illegal is not insubordination; neither is refusing to perform an action that is not within the scope of authority of the person issuing the order.[citation needed]

Insubordination is generally a punishable offense in hierarchical organizations which depend on people lower in the chain of command doing what they are expected to do.

Military

Sixteen blindfolded partisan youth await execution by German forces in Serbia, 1941. Allegedly, German soldier Josef Schulz refused to take part in the action and was executed along with the youth.

Insubordination is refusal by a subordinate to obey lawful orders given by a commissioned officer or non commissioned officer (NCO). Refusal of a military officer to obey his (civilian) superiors would also count, although in some nations, the head of the government is (at least technically) also the most superior officer of the military (see for example Commander in Chief).[1][2][3][4] Generally, an officer or soldier is expected to be insubordinate to the point of mutiny if given an unlawful order, however.[citation needed] (see Nuremberg defense)

In the U.S. military, insubordination is covered under Article 91 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.[5] It covers disobeying lawful orders as well as disrespectful language or even striking a superior. The article for insubordination should not be confused with the article for contempt. While Article 91 of the UCMJ deals predominately with disobeying or disrespecting a superior and applies to enlisted members and warrant officers, Article 88 involves the use of contemptuous words against certain appointed or elected officials and only applies to commissioned officers.[6]

Economy

Other types of hierarchical structures, especially corporations, may use insubordination as a reason for dismissal or censure of an employee.

There have been court cases in the United States which have involved charges of insubordination from the employer with counter charges of infringement of First Amendment rights from the employee. A number of these cases have reached the U.S. Supreme Court usually involving a conflict between an institution of higher education and a faculty member.[7][8]

In the modern workplace in the Western world, hierarchical power relationships are usually sufficiently internalized so that the issue of formal charges of insubordination are rare. In his book Disciplined Minds, American physicist and writer Jeff Schmidt points out that professionals are trusted to run organizations in the interests of their employers. Because employers cannot be on hand to manage every decision, professionals are trained "to make sure that the subtext of each and every detail of their work advances the right interests — or skewers the disfavored ones” in the absence of overt control.[9]

Examples

There have been a number of famous and notorious people who have committed insubordination or publicly objected to an organizational practice.

See also

References

  1. ^ usmilitary.about.com. Article 90—Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  2. ^ usmilitary.about.com.Article 91—Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, NCO, or PO. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  3. ^ usmilitary.about.com.Article 92—Failure to obey order or regulation. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  4. ^ usmilitary.about.com.Article 94—Mutiny and sedition. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  5. ^ usmilitary.about.com.Article 91—Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, NCO, or PO. Accessed November 25, 2013.
  6. ^ usmilitary.about.com.Article 88—Contempt toward officials. Accessed December 9, 2010.
  7. ^ Imber, Michael and Tyll Van Geel (2001). A Teacher's Guide to Education Law. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. p. 196. ISBN 0-8058-3754-X. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.
  8. ^ Kaplin, William A. and Barbar A. Lee (2007). The Law of Higher Education. Jossey-Baass. p. 234. ISBN 978-0-7879-7095-6. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.
  9. ^ Schmidt, Jeff (2001). Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-battering System That Shapes Their Lives. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. p. 41. ISBN 0-7425-1685-7. Google Book Search. Retrieved on December 10, 2010.