User talk:Paddles

Welcome!

Hello, Paddles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ballydougan

I have rewritten this article based on What Links Here and a reference in the Northern Ireland Yearbook. I would be gratful if you could take a look.Capitalistroadster 22:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charismatic Christianity WikiProject

Hi, Paddles. You might want to consider joining the Charismatic Christianity WikiProject. David L Rattigan 07:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you who I think you are?

Are you the Tim Anderson you studied electrical engineering with Simon Job at UNSW and went to Moore Theological College? Journeyman 23:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry. I know people from UNSW and Moore, but didn't study at either (or engineering). Paddles 09:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Journeyman 23:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

prods

You wrote: Delete per nom; unverifiable. It doesn't meet any of the criteria for Speedy though. You could whack a prod on it, but that won't neccessarily be resolved much quicker than AfD. Paddles TC 03:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I have actually been accused of trying to sneakily delete a file because I applied a prod. I avoid them now completely. Ste4k 09:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixing" non-broken redirects

Wikipedia:Redirect Until/unless someone actually makes Borg a disambiguation page or some such, there's no reason to change those links. Also, someone probably will roll through and move the page to "Borg (Star Trek)" per what seems to be the Trek-specific article naming convention. --EEMeltonIV 23:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LongGammon

(In response to User_talk:Ptkfgs#Longgammon_in_Backgammon)

I removed it because, besides the one page at Backgammon Galore, and a bunch of Wikipedia mirrors, I couldn't find any information on the game. It also hasn't come up in any of the literature I've been reading during my searches at the library. Perhaps it is known better by another name? —ptk✰fgs 17:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Longgammon is a variant offered on more than one online site ([1] is one example) and in at least one standalone software package ([2]). It also gets mentioned, in various levels of detail, on other pages such as [3] and [4]. Given the commercial nature of some of those links, I could see them being removed pretty quickly if I'd included them as citations. I think it's supposed to be mentioned on dmoz but it isn't serving me pages at the moment.

That should be enough to substantiate that it exists and is known as Longgammon, so I'd think it'd be appropriate to at least include it in the Backgammon article (I don't feel a need to set up a standalone article like Hypergammon until we have more to say about it). Thoughts? -- Paddles ^T_C 07:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Disambiguation in United Church of Christ

The problem is that the link was appropriate to the article Evangelical back in the fall when there was actually content on the article Evangelical that explained the meaning/usage of that word in the European / Reformation context. (Go back in the history to, say August or September) That content has seemingly disappeared. In the context used in the United Church of Christ article, neither Evangelicalism nor Evangelism are the correct destination for this link. Emerymat 16:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jessie Penn-Lewis copyedits

Thanks for your copy-edits[5] on the Jessie Penn-Lewis article--I should have done the "so and so (minister)" links properly myself, but do appreciate all the folks at Wikipedia who come after my edits and make everything better for those using Wikipedia for information. KP Botany 04:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Cleaner

Hi,

Apparently Wikipedia has been updated to a newer version (1.11 alpha) in the last few days and this update has broken Wikipedia Cleaner. It has been reported here. I didn't find the time to investigate this before (working for Toulouse underground transportation, and it just opened today, so I was quite busy). I am probably going to look at this today.

For the window size, I have to add an option for memorizing window sizes. Will also do it when I have time.

--NicoV 16:19, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed with version 0.26. It was due to a modification in Wikipedia itself. --NicoV 17:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your AWB edits

Hi Paddles,

I think something is broken in your AWB setup. It is making changes such as replacing "dorsal fin" with "dorsal fin". I just reverted you on Orca because your edit broke a bunch of good links. Can you look into what's going on? Thanks and take care, Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 15:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I was using an option to simplify removing multiple links to the one article, (trying to keep just the first link) but now realise that this is not actually required by WP:MOS-L - plus there was something going wrong and sometimes the first link was being taken away. But that's my fault, not the fault of the tool; thanks for highlighting that I wasn't being careful enough. Paddles ^T_C 04:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks Paddles! Cheers, Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 05:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Paddles! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paddles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paddles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]