User talk:ClueBot Commons

The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

False positive

How do I know when the verdict is returned on the false positive ClueBot yielded? --Arise again, Arisedrew! (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

If you've reported it via the link above, you won't know. It's assessed by another editor, and if it's a false positive the bot is trained on it.--5 albert square (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the info; yeah, I reported it right away. It's really interesting to me - I'd love to know precisely what tripped it. --Arise again, Arisedrew! (talk) 03:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Do you have a link to it? Maybe someone on here could try and guess :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 1726 Hoffmeister for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1726 Hoffmeister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1726 Hoffmeister until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 1734 Zhongolovich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1734 Zhongolovich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1734 Zhongolovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 1796 Riga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1796 Riga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1796 Riga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 1692 Subbotina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1692 Subbotina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1692 Subbotina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Question about indicies

I (not-so) recently had my username changed from |Ajl772 to radar33. If I move the indices page from User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Ajl772 to User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Radar33 (and any other of my userpages), will it screw up Cluebot's script, or will it still function okay?

I don't monitor Wikipedia as much as I used to, so if you would be to kind as to leave me a message on |my talk page, or at least a notice that a response has been made here, I'd appreciate that. – radar³³ 04:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)