Jump to content

User talk:157.178.1.101: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Luke Weil. (TW)
Evershawn (talk | contribs)
m Reverted 1 edit by Shibbolethink (talk) to last revision by Wywin. (TW)
Line 33: Line 33:
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:Wywin|Wywin]]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of [[Special:Contributions/157.178.1.101|your recent contributions]]&nbsp;to [[:Latrell Sprewell]] because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Wywin|my talk page]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> -- [[User:Wywin|Wywin]] ([[User talk:Wywin|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Wywin|contribs]]) 14:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:Wywin|Wywin]]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of [[Special:Contributions/157.178.1.101|your recent contributions]]&nbsp;to [[:Latrell Sprewell]] because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Wywin|my talk page]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> -- [[User:Wywin|Wywin]] ([[User talk:Wywin|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Wywin|contribs]]) 14:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Luke Weil]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on [[:Luke Weil]], requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
* It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See [[WP:CSD#G11|section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].) Please read [[Wikipedia:Spam|the guidelines on spam]] and [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Business]] for more information.
*It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, ''etc.''), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See [[WP:CSD#A7|section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Luke Weil|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. [[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 01:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:58, 12 April 2015

AfD nomination of The_American_Lackey

I've nominated The_American_Lackey, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that The_American_Lackey satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The_American_Lackey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of The_American_Lackey during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IrishGuy 08:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Calorie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Two-party system has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 13:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Two-party system constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Two-party system. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. leujohn (talk, contribs) 13:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Gazimoff 21:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Your edits to Swaminarayan are disruptive, and you have been blocked for 31 hours. Please discuss your proposed edits on the article talkpage, and do not edit war. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1991 Halloween blizzard, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 23:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Wywin. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Latrell Sprewell because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 14:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.