Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARAS (software): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
[[User:Blueinsect|Blueinsect]] ([[User talk:Blueinsect|talk]]) 12:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Blueinsect|Blueinsect]] ([[User talk:Blueinsect|talk]]) 12:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
:* {{Re|Blueinsect}} [[WP:OTHER]] is not a reason to prevent deletion, but specifically, Airtime won an [https://web.archive.org/web/20140107015940/http://www.theguardian.com/megas/winners-2012 award], Campcaster was featured in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6241923.stm BBC reporting] and OpenBroadcaster seems to have some sources to indicate notability too. [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 15:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
:* {{Re|Blueinsect}} [[WP:OTHER]] is not a reason to prevent deletion, but specifically, Airtime won an [https://web.archive.org/web/20140107015940/http://www.theguardian.com/megas/winners-2012 award], Campcaster was featured in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6241923.stm BBC reporting] and OpenBroadcaster seems to have some sources to indicate notability too. [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 15:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
::* Google search, "openbroadcaster" "radio automation": 636 results, "aras" "radio automation":868 results, between them: [http://medioscomunitarios.net/tecnologia/?p=158], [http://radialistas.net/article/automatizacion-libre/] or [http://ctpcordoba.com.ar/media/uploads/manual_radio_con_sl.pdf] [[User:Blueinsect|Blueinsect]] ([[User talk:Blueinsect|talk]]) 10:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:28, 19 April 2015

ARAS (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I looked for sources and did not find enough sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Possible it could've been CSDed as promotional given it's currently only a list of features and basic description with no secondary sources... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, some sources in the direction of "if you have JACK you might also like ARAS" exist, but as I don't know the topic I didn't bother to add it, because I couldn't explain why a Softpedia review about JACK helps with the notabilty for ARAS. Hopefully some Linux folks with a clue can help out here with reasons to delete or keep this article. It's not spammy, free software, no speedy required. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blueinsect (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]