Talk:Bang Bang!: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:53, 22 April 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bang Bang! article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Film: Indian C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Cinema C‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Bipasha

Where's Bipasha's name ???????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.226.252.188 (talk) 09:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Box office section

There seems to be a disagreement over what that section should contain. One editor changed it in this edit with an edit summary. Another changed it back with no edit summary. So, I reverted to the version with the edit summary explanation. I have invited both parties here to discuss things. Please work it out here before changing the article again. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind invitation. Box Office India's figures are used in every film's boxoffice section. Sorry, I didn't give explanation for my edit. Perhaps you should tell Raj2991 that Wikipedia is not the place to favour your favorite star. That's why he's manipulating collections by following some other trade magazine. Why? Box Office India's figures are not enough for him? Why doesn't he have problem with Box Office India when it comes to other films' boxoffice? Why manipulate Bang Bang's figures only? Please revert it to my edit. Thanks. Armaan.haider (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BOX OFFICE INDIA figures are highly erroneous and WIKIPEDIA goes by the facts not by any defined website.Every other trade websites other than fallacious BOX office India quotes the same figures.So,Armaan.haider (talk) look into facts before blindly following a particular website and citing Wikipedia's name for it.

WIKIPEDIA goes by truth and not by your favourite BOX OFFICE INDIA.

Reliability of Boxofficeindia.com

It seems, after a really long debate back in 2008, that Boxofficeindia is considered by Wikipedia to be a reliable source even thought it is Self-published.

The thread: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Boxofficeindia.com

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping us clear the air. Appreciate it. Thanks Armaan.haider (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2015

122.176.16.78 (talk) 10:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Total gross box office collection is 260 Crores.. Pls see the link below..[reply]

http://boxofficeindia.com/Details/art_detail/themusicofpkdoesnotseemifthefirsttwosongsarethebestofthelotsocanitstillbeattherecordsasitisexpectedtodo#.VTd8NNKqqko

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The plot is too long and also spoils the movie. Also, there are multiple grammatical and spelling errors. JazzKor (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Amortias (T)(C) 19:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 == Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2015 ==
+[[Special:Contributions/122.176.16.78|122.176.16.78]] ([[User talk:122.176.16.78|talk]]) 10:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Total gross box office collection is 260 Crores.. Pls see the link below..
+http://boxofficeindia.com/Details/art_detail/themusicofpkdoesnotseemifthefirsttwosongsarethebestofthelotsocanitstillbeattherecordsasitisexpectedtodo#.VTd8NNKqqko
 {{edit semi-protected|Bang Bang!|answered=yes}}