Jump to content

User talk:Roscelese: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Roscelese/Archive 14) (bot
→‎my page: new WikiLove message
Tag: wikilove
Line 34: Line 34:


Please cite sources on Wikipedia, in accordance with [[WP:RS]]. You made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_Research_Council&diff=656607246&oldid=655398970 this edit], which was unsourced.
Please cite sources on Wikipedia, in accordance with [[WP:RS]]. You made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_Research_Council&diff=656607246&oldid=655398970 this edit], which was unsourced.

== my page ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Trophy.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''destroying someones creation'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | thanks man, for destroying my page, heres a medal. [[User:Seasicktugboat|Seasicktugboat]] ([[User talk:Seasicktugboat|talk]]) 03:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 03:13, 28 April 2015

Hello, Roscelese. You have new messages at RAN1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Copied from one user talk page on Lankiveil's behalf. --George Ho (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration request regarding actions of some editors in the Christianity and Sexuality topic has now closed and the decision can be read here. The following remedies have been put in place:

  1. User:Esoglou and User:Padresfan94 have been site banned. Both users may appeal their bans after one year.
  2. User:Roscelese is indefinitely restricted from making no more than one revert per page per day (except for indisputable vandalism and BLP violations), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. They are also prohibited from making rollback-style reverts without providing an explanation, and from engaging in conduct that casts aspersions or personalises disputes.
  3. User:Dominus Vobisdu is admonished for edit warring. In addition, they are restricted to one revert per page per day, and are required to discuss content reversions on the article talk page. This restriction may be appealed after twelve months.

For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Copied from one user talk page on Lankiveil's behalf. --George Ho (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

A little know fact about Wikipedia dispute resolution is you're not actually required to reply, especially when your position is the correct one. NE Ent 23:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, thanks :) –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 13:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 131.109.225.24 (talk) 18:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, it appears the IP doesn't know what the words "per page" means, and the report will be dismissed shortly. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Family Research Council

Please cite sources on Wikipedia, in accordance with WP:RS. You made this edit, which was unsourced.

my page

destroying someones creation
thanks man, for destroying my page, heres a medal. Seasicktugboat (talk) 03:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]