Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paramahamsa Tewari: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:28, 27 May 2015

Paramahamsa Tewari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is based on single source (ET report) apart from a self published source. Also a case of WP:COPYVIO. I am inclined to say that this article should be deleted. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article not based on single source.Please see^[1] ^[2] ^[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amruth M D (talk • contribs) 17:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: At the time I tagged the article, it was based on single source and a self published source. Article still needs to pass WP:GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep:- Subject of the article is a notable engineer and inventor. He was formerly an Executive Director of Nuclear Power Corporation of India [1]. I also found India Today, Economic Times and World Science Database]. The fact that an article contain a single source is not a valid reason for deletion. I remind the nominator that deletion is not the only way to deal with Copyright infringement problems. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleting is a way to fix copyright issues. Voting «Strong Keep» without editing the article is not a way to fix copyright issues. Spumuq (talq) 15:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - New sources have been added since nomination by Amruth M D ~Kvng (talk) 14:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it has copyright violation and NPOV faults. Spumuq (talq) 15:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:REDFLAG. For an individual who is supposed to be notable for defying the First law of thermodynamics, there should be a LARGE number of independent and reliable academic sources covering this historic breakthrough. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, A prototype of the article tested in the labs of Kirloskar Group exhibited 165% bullshit. 76.107.171.90 (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/engineer-paramahamsa-tewaris-invention-space-power-generator-excites-interest/1/337896.html

[2] ttp://pesn.com/2015/04/15/9602603_Paramahamsa-Tewari_Reactionless-AC-Synchronous-Generator_RLG_prepping-for-commercial-roll-out/

[3] ttp://changingpower.net/tewari-begins-the-energy-revolution/

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 *'''Delete''', it has copyright violation and NPOV faults. [[User:Spumuq|Spumu''q'']] ([[User talk:Spumuq|tal''q'']]) 15:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per [[WP:REDFLAG]]. For an individual who is supposed to be notable for defying the [[First law of thermodynamics]], there should be a LARGE number of independent and reliable academic sources covering this historic breakthrough. - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie|talk]]) 17:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''', A prototype of the article tested in the labs of Kirloskar Group exhibited 165% [[WP:BULLSHIT|bullshit]].  [[Special:Contributions/76.107.171.90|76.107.171.90]] ([[User talk:76.107.171.90|talk]]) 05:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)