Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comments
PeerReviewBot (talk | contribs)
Archiving peer review (bot task 1)
Line 5: Line 5:
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved.
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved.
-->
-->
'''This peer review discussion has been closed.'''<br/> <noinclude>[[Category:June 2015 peer reviews]]</noinclude>
{{Peer review page|topic=List}}
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to FL status. [[User:Yashthepunisher|Yashthepunisher]] ([[User talk:Yashthepunisher|talk]])'' 5:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to FL status. [[User:Yashthepunisher|Yashthepunisher]] ([[User talk:Yashthepunisher|talk]])'' 5:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)



Revision as of 00:08, 3 June 2015

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to FL status. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I will comments in a few days, but before that please withdraw the FLC as it is not valid to have WP:PR and WP:FLC open at the same time. --FrankBoy CHITCHAT 10:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from FrB.TG
  • I find WP:POV issue here as I find every film mentioned as "critically acclaimed" OR is it that all of his films were praised?
  • He does not have so many acting (major role) credits in his pocket so why mention so many?
  • "occasional actor" is a little bit weird or I should say... urgh!
  • "known for his work in Hindi cinema" - Replace "Hindi cinema" with "Bollywood" as we always use this term.
  • "He later wrote and directed a short tele-film, Last Train to Mahakali (1999)" - Television film sounds much better.
  • "His next venture was Black Friday (2007), a film about the 1993 Mumbai bombings" - "1993 Bombay bombings".
  • Ref no. 7 does not say that the film Black Friday opened to "widespread critical appreciation".
  • "In 2009, he came up with Dev.D" - What do you mean by "came up"?
  • "His first release of in 2010 was the anthology film Mumbai Cutting"
  • Can you swipe the places of "Year" and "Title" in the table as every "FL" filmography uses this format.
  • Are you sure that Yudh comes under the "Feature films" category?
  • Tables do not meet WP:ACCESS for row and col scopes (see MOS:DTT).
  • Can you mention the upcoming films' stages that they have reached.
  • Centering the refs. make them look better.
  • Awards (in the table) should be restricted to the National Film Awards and Filmfare as in filmography we have the most notable ones.
  • Link the publisher of the reference on its first instance.
  • YouTube source is not acceptable especially if it is by an unknown user (I mean not by an official channel). BTW a YouTube source only acceptable when there is no other reliable source available. -- FrankBoy CHITCHAT 21:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]