User talk:Widr: Difference between revisions
→iuthemwl: Re |
Iuthemwlorg (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Regards <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Iuthemwlorg|Iuthemwlorg]] ([[User talk:Iuthemwlorg|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Iuthemwlorg|contribs]]) 08:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Regards <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Iuthemwlorg|Iuthemwlorg]] ([[User talk:Iuthemwlorg|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Iuthemwlorg|contribs]]) 08:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Please see the previous reply. [[User:Widr|Widr]] ([[User talk:Widr#top|talk]]) 09:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC) |
:Please see the previous reply. [[User:Widr|Widr]] ([[User talk:Widr#top|talk]]) 09:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
== iuthemwl ==</br> |
|||
Greetings</br> |
|||
We already read that, and we still want to edit the article</br> |
|||
the person who wrote it has an extremist vision about our foundation</br> |
|||
The US Supreme Court ruled us righteous judgment, but the article writer NOT</br> |
|||
So it is our writes to at least ADD to the article our point of view</br> |
|||
[[User:Iuthemwlorg|Iuthemwlorg]] |
Revision as of 09:46, 8 June 2015
This is Widr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72Auto-archiving period: 1 days ![]() |
TISM
Sorry, I did think I was making a constructive edit. I have a videotape around here somewhere on which TISM uses the moniker "This Is Shit Music" in an official capacity, but I'm going to have to dig through the archive so I can cite it properly, then make the edit again. Will make sure to have my material on hand next time.
- Yeah, that kind of addition definitely needs a reliable source. Widr (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi
I'm having to use my phone, the sources listed are from 2011 and 2012, if you can be patient with me I'll have sources to show that article does require updating, thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous573462 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hello. You can use your Sandbox to make experiments, or hit the "preview" button before saving your changes to the article, so you can make sure your additions are formatted correctly. Widr (talk) 07:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
A question... Do YouTube links count as sources? There are a couple of videos there where it can be witnessed a UK group called the Freedom Rebels have ended a couple of court cases successfully without needed to pay council tax on one specifically... Also to note; The UK constitution; from my knowledge if we were to infer that there is one and based on documents; The Coronation Oath requires that the queen must Abide the gospels... I've never seen it in use but surely if she or any government official is enacted power, therefore everyone shares that power "Do in return to others, as you'd have done in return to you" (and no civil arrests can be made when a sovereign is present.) sovereign is the highest authority in the civil courts in black's dictionary. Anyone who holds office is sworn to serve the queen and would commit treason otherwise, or essentially, not "returning equal jurisdiction".
I can't be bothered to edit today, but to put "every case had failed" doesn't look true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous573462 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Have a look at this article, that should help you with all things related to sources. I don't really have an opinion on the content of the article itself, as it was just the malformatted edits that triggered the anti-vandalism tool that I'm using. Widr (talk) 10:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I never considered the Guardian to be a reliable source of information... Same can be said with benchmark or any newspaper... Hence why I criticized the article. Is there anyway to point this out? Because on YouTube, I can confirm a couple of cases where the "freemen" have won in a court with links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous573462 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would suggest you bring these issues to the article's talk page, so other editors can also weigh in. Widr (talk) 14:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm having some trouble finding this talk page, are you able to create me a link? Thanks and sorry for the trouble still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous573462 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I was showing someone how to make their own wiki private...
Hey, sorry about that. I did not mean to act like I was vandalizing the site. I was trying to show someone that if a wiki is public, anybody could have access to change the contents. So I changed just one word of this site to show them, and forgot to change it back. I did not mean to change your site.
- It's okay. It was not the worst thing you could have done. Widr (talk) 20:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Paul Scheer wiki page
Hi, I was the guy who's edits you changed. Very nice to meet you! I actually work for his company and was helping him make changes. Could you help me change his profile picture for him? I have a different photo but don't have the ability to make photo edits. I would greatly appreciate it! Thank you!
Best, Jordan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmichaelbean (talk • contribs) 07:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Jordan. Unfortunately, since you have conflict of interest, it would be best for you not to edit the article at all. Widr (talk) 07:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
USS Arizona
Not to be rude but i never did any edits to this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Arizona_(BB-39) ive never even been on this page so just to tell you. in all respect you got the wrong guy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.129.93.237 (talk) 03:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Kentucky
Cincinnati is the biggest metro area in Kentucky. The fact that majority of the people in the Cincinnati metro area live in Ohio doesn't make the largest Metro area not Cincinnati. I assume the reason they include largest metro area on this article is because it is different from the largest city in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikamjh (talk • contribs) 14:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ikamjh: There is a hidden note in the section suggesting a consensus. If you disagree, instead of edit warring, you need to raise the issue on the talk page of the article. Widr (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Paul Potts and Pol Pot?
I deleted the portion of Paul Potts Wiki page as his biogrpahy was that of PolPot(Cambodian Dictator). It made little sense as to how Paul Potts was confused with Pol Pot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.125.210 (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. There has indeed been some prior vandalism, so I reverted further back a bit more. Widr (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Heroes (Måns Zelmerlöw song)
Hello. Scotish chart isn't main chart too. Israel is only airplay chat. Why no names charts? Mess on the English version of Wikipedia. Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Skip sentence about mess and read rest. Check article on Polish versin of Wikipedia. It is pretty to understand this. Eurohunter (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
wrong information about MWL
Please check your content about Muslim World League you can find correct information here http://en.themwl.org/about-mwl
please remove false content.
thanks
IT manager at Muslim World League — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iuthemwlorg (talk • contribs) 07:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Please discuss your concerns on the article's talk page. It would be best for you not to edit the article yourself, since you have conflict of interest. Widr (talk) 07:56, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
iuthemwl
Greetings
We want to edit the following article
To add our point of view to that foundation
In Wiki article about Muslim World League there is one side of the story and we want to add ours.
We are sorry about the last few editing it was a mistake from our staff we asked them to add to the article and they deleted the content of it.
Now is there a problem in adding to it or what shall we do?
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iuthemwlorg (talk • contribs) 08:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Please see the previous reply. Widr (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
== iuthemwl ==
Greetings
We already read that, and we still want to edit the article
the person who wrote it has an extremist vision about our foundation
The US Supreme Court ruled us righteous judgment, but the article writer NOT
So it is our writes to at least ADD to the article our point of view