User talk:2005

No Drama Zone

This page is a no drama zone. Please do not add soap opera or other personal drama content to this page as it will only be removed. Please only add content relating to the creation and improvement of articles, or the overall encyclopedia guidelines and policies. Thanks. 2005 (talk) 23:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I, Sirex98 hereby award The Barnstar of Diligence to 2005 for extensive work in articles, due to a large body of contributions and having a keen eye for detail on various edits made on Wikipedia

Thanks for your contributions...

		The Gambler's Barnstar
		On October 25, 2009 Evercat hereby presents you with the first ever Gambler's Barnstar for your unceasing work on keeping gambling-related articles free from spam.

Global account

Hi 2005! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Cheer up, dude! :)

MaRAno ^FAN 07:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Please review

Hey man - I'm not trying to spam/do purely promotional links. Please See North American Gambling Treatment Centers

As there are only 3, and one has been banned from making direct links for too much black hat advertising, I'm doing my best to make it neutral. Suggestions would be appreciated, I feel the remainder of my sentences contributed to the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncab593 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

There are many treatment centers for people with gambling addiction, not just three. Please don't add content that says there are just three, especially content that quotes those three centers saying they are the only three. 2005 (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

friendly advice

As you seem to have these issues with many people the solution seems very simple. Some people don't appreciate your attitude and the way you try to own the whole poker topic. Learn to get along with others, be nice and be open to collaboration -- and maybe you can keep some of your pet BLP's. Continue on with this approach and people will keep making things hard for you out of spite. Your choice. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 08:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't think you should threaten User:2005 by saying "others" will make things difficult when you are under investigation for sock puppetry and edit-warring.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Others means people other than me. Thus it's not possible for that to be a threat. Hope that helps. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Handpolk Simply meant it could be implied since you clearly have a grudge against 2005 and have strong evidence against you for sock puppetry, though I won't accuse you of it.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

This 'strong evidence' consists of me nominating dozens of articles for deletion and this editor having edited one of them -- and my citing 'the spirit of IAR' one time and this other editor having a thing for that policy. I'm not sure that would hold up in court. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

And for you, Handpolk, you can perhaps tone down your highly aggressive behaviour and stop handing out warnings like cookies. Ow, and hiding all those warning you have received will not help much. The Banner talk 10:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I understand I am 100% at fault here. All the baseless accusations and personal attacks this editor made to me all over Wikipedia are perfectly fine, along with the extremely rude and demeaning way they treat anybody else who tries to contribute to WikiProject Poker or any poker article, in a way they disagree with. This is all fine. It's me issuing a warning once I am subjected to a torrent of false accusations and personal attacks that is the real problem. I will correct my behavior. Thank you. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry 2005, please ignore the trolling above, the user is getting more and more rampant.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 12:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I can't help the fact that you are biased against me and for 2005 and refuse to see the facts in front of you (or even examine them). Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I see a user (you) who is viciously attacking other helpful users because he has been caught for breaking policy and wants someone to pity him/her and adding bogus warnings to respectable contributors merely for doing their job here.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 12:35, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

I haven't attacked anybody nor I have been caught breaking any policy nor have I issued any bogus warnings. Now you are the one making personal attacks by spreading lies about me. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Also please enlighten me how you were 'doing your job here' by vandalizing my talk page. Handpolk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)