User talk:Anarchyte: Difference between revisions

I have rewritten certain parts which did not match the encyclopedia writing style. And I have also added a few more references including one from the Huffington Post.

Could you please let me know if it is fine to go live now with the changes?

Appreciate your help as this is my first submission to Wikipedia.

Thanks, Atish

AtishU (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Review of Draft:Creative Biolabs

Hello Anarchyte！Thanks for your suggestion on how to make my article Draft:Creative Biolabs better. I have updated it on July 6 and believe it is ready to be reviewed again. Thanks for your work! CandyTon (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today's articles for improvement – discussion about changing project processes

Hello Anarchyte:

A discussion is occurring at Change project processes regarding potential changes to the Today's articles for improvement Wikiproject. Your input is welcomed at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 11:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This week's articles for improvement (week 30, 2015)

Dessert is a typically sweet course that concludes an evening meal. Pictured is a chocolate-strawberry crumble ball.

Hello, Anarchyte.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:

Previous selections: Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam • Party

Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...

Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) on 04:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

01:11:58, 21 July 2015 review of submission by KJacobi1121

KJacobi1121 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Going with the Pitch: Adjusting to Baseball, School and Life as a Division I College Athlete (Second Edition) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

KJacobi1121 (talk) 01:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add a few new sources and make the page look more professional. My goal is to make the page neutral, not an advertisement but if it is still reading as such, can you provide some sections that need amending?

09:48:37, 23 July 2015 review of submission by Editandsave

Editandsave (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gaurav Narayanan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Editandsave (talk) 09:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Hi Anarchyte, Thank you for the review. I am a novice editor. I could not quit understand the decline reason. Can you pls help me there, so that I can correct and resubmit for review. Thank you.[reply]

Nomination of 3SwitcheD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3SwitcheD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3SwitcheD until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Taman Shud Case

The article Taman Shud Case you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Taman Shud Case for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaciemonster -- Kaciemonster (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ring Learning with Errors Signature

Ring Learning with Errors Signature Anarchyte, I understand you comment about the article appearing to be opinion. I went back through the lead and the introduction and cited the source for most of the sentences. Many of the sources were from other wikipedia articles which I had not cited because I linked to them. I have now added those citations and other citations. I also modified a few sentences to take out adjectives like "rich." Hopefully you may find this less of opinion essay. If you still feel it contains too much opinion it would help to know where so I can improve it. Carvalho1988 (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 134: / Line 134: @@
 == Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Taman Shud Case]]==
 The article [[Taman Shud Case]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:Taman Shud Case]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Kaciemonster|Kaciemonster]]</small> -- [[User:Kaciemonster|Kaciemonster]] ([[User talk:Kaciemonster|talk]]) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
+== Ring Learning with Errors Signature ==
+Ring Learning with Errors Signature Anarchyte, I understand you comment about the article appearing to be opinion. I went back through the lead and the introduction and cited the source for most of the sentences. Many of the sources were from other wikipedia articles which I had not cited because I linked to them. I have now added those citations and other citations. I also modified a few sentences to take out adjectives like "rich." Hopefully you may find this less of opinion essay. If you still feel it contains too much opinion it would help to know where so I can improve it. [[User:Carvalho1988|Carvalho1988]] ([[User talk:Carvalho1988|talk]]) 16:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)