User talk:Anarchyte: Difference between revisions
Carvalho1988 (talk | contribs) →Ring Learning with Errors Signature: new section |
Carvalho1988 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
== Ring Learning with Errors Signature == |
== Ring Learning with Errors Signature == |
||
⚫ | Anarchyte, I understand you comment about the article appearing to be opinion. I went back through the lead and the introduction and cited the source for most of the sentences. Many of the sources were from other wikipedia articles which I had not cited because I linked to them. I have now added those citations and other citations. I also modified a few sentences to take out adjectives like "rich." Hopefully you may find this less of opinion essay. If you still feel it contains too much opinion it would help to know where so I can improve it. [[User:Carvalho1988|Carvalho1988]] ([[User talk:Carvalho1988|talk]]) 16:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
⚫ |
Revision as of 16:09, 26 July 2015
This is Anarchyte's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
This is Anarchyte's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Today's articles for improvement weekly vote
- Hello Anarchyte:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 32 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2015)
Hello, Anarchyte.
The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: Holiest sites in Islam • Party • Fat Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
09:13:26, 14 July 2015 review of submission by AtishU
Hi Anarchyte,
I have rewritten certain parts which did not match the encyclopedia writing style. And I have also added a few more references including one from the Huffington Post.
Could you please let me know if it is fine to go live now with the changes?
Appreciate your help as this is my first submission to Wikipedia.
Thanks, Atish
AtishU (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Request for Review of Draft:Creative Biolabs
Hello Anarchyte!Thanks for your suggestion on how to make my article Draft:Creative Biolabs better. I have updated it on July 6 and believe it is ready to be reviewed again. Thanks for your work! CandyTon (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Today's articles for improvement – discussion about changing project processes
- Hello Anarchyte:
- A discussion is occurring at Change project processes regarding potential changes to the Today's articles for improvement Wikiproject. Your input is welcomed at the discussion.
This week's articles for improvement (week 30, 2015)
Hello, Anarchyte.
The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam • Party Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) on 04:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
01:11:58, 21 July 2015 review of submission by KJacobi1121
- KJacobi1121 (talk · contribs)
KJacobi1121 (talk) 01:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
I tried to add a few new sources and make the page look more professional. My goal is to make the page neutral, not an advertisement but if it is still reading as such, can you provide some sections that need amending?
09:48:37, 23 July 2015 review of submission by Editandsave
- Editandsave (talk · contribs)
Editandsave (talk) 09:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Hi Anarchyte, Thank you for the review. I am a novice editor. I could not quit understand the decline reason. Can you pls help me there, so that I can correct and resubmit for review. Thank you.
Nomination of 3SwitcheD for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3SwitcheD until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Taman Shud Case
The article Taman Shud Case you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Taman Shud Case for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaciemonster -- Kaciemonster (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Ring Learning with Errors Signature
Anarchyte, I understand you comment about the article appearing to be opinion. I went back through the lead and the introduction and cited the source for most of the sentences. Many of the sources were from other wikipedia articles which I had not cited because I linked to them. I have now added those citations and other citations. I also modified a few sentences to take out adjectives like "rich." Hopefully you may find this less of opinion essay. If you still feel it contains too much opinion it would help to know where so I can improve it. Carvalho1988 (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)