Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airports in the Vatican: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
R
Line 19: Line 19:
::Thank you, but this is a canvassed vote. [[User:No names left!! abcd|No names left!! abcd]] ([[User talk:No names left!! abcd|talk]]) 22:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
::Thank you, but this is a canvassed vote. [[User:No names left!! abcd|No names left!! abcd]] ([[User talk:No names left!! abcd|talk]]) 22:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Vatican City Heliport]]. No point in having this as a seperate article considering it's a 1 item list. - [[User:Happysailor|<span style="color:#8B0000">'''Happysailor'''</span>]] [[User talk:Happysailor|<sup><span style="color:Green"><i>(Talk)</i></span></sup>]] 22:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Vatican City Heliport]]. No point in having this as a seperate article considering it's a 1 item list. - [[User:Happysailor|<span style="color:#8B0000">'''Happysailor'''</span>]] [[User talk:Happysailor|<sup><span style="color:Green"><i>(Talk)</i></span></sup>]] 22:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
:::Not anymore. Wikipedia is now the only common source that shows the second airport and it has an obscure citation from 1970. This shows that Wikipedia is great. Destroy and wipe out this list article (note: list of airports in ____country is very common) and you harm mankind and knowledge just like book burning. [[User:No names left!! abcd|No names left!! abcd]] ([[User talk:No names left!! abcd|talk]]) 22:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:43, 16 August 2015

List of airports in the Vatican (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a joke/prank article creation. Editor who created the article is making numerous test and vandalism like edits. -- WV 17:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G3. They've got the Vatican City Heliport, and that's it. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep Bad faith nomination by WV, who is stalking/hounding me and reversing every edit I make. She admits having mental illness (Asperger's Syndrome) so this may be excused but her actions cannot be excused (and this nomination should end).
Also there is a long list of articles entitled "List of airports in _____" country. This article is extremely useful because some airport enthusiasts will be looking at "Lists of airport" articles to find useful information. Therefore, strong keep. No names left!! abcd (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like there is a template so removing Vatican could damage the template. Actually, these lists help those looking for small countries because everyone knows "List of airports in the United States" would be huge. Many people will click on the small countries, like the Vatican and Luxembourg. No names left!! abcd (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Get it right, No names left!! abcd: No one is hounding you, I'm not a she, Asperger Syndrome is not a "mental illness", and me being on the Autism Spectrum has nothing to do with this deletion nomination or this article's creation. -- WV 16:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but this is a canvassed vote. No names left!! abcd (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not anymore. Wikipedia is now the only common source that shows the second airport and it has an obscure citation from 1970. This shows that Wikipedia is great. Destroy and wipe out this list article (note: list of airports in ____country is very common) and you harm mankind and knowledge just like book burning. No names left!! abcd (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]