Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Fasha: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:23, 1 September 2015

Sarah Fasha

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Lacks significant number of reliable sources. Pageant won was minor and virtally unknown, as no major or reliable source actually reported on who won the pageant. All/most sources contained in the article are not high quality, and do not meet the standard for a reliable source. Additionally, Anyone can speak at TEDx independent speaking event, so if we had an article for every person that spoke at an independent (non-notable) TEDx event, we would have many more non-notable people on Wikipedia. As for the "YouTube" section, she is virtually non-existent on Youtube with a very low subscriber count (~2000) further proving her non-notability, and the article focuses on Youtube for a large part. Article as a whole is a clear and simple violation the Wikipedia notability policy. Megat503 (talk) 05:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with the points the nominator made. Subject does not meet notability guidelines.comet1440 (User talk:comet1440) 01:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree, she's bullied because of her Muslim background and skin color. I think her page should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StePAhi (talk • contribs) 22:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep I checked the references in the page and I can find Italian, American, Egyptian Magazines and even talk shows even her IMDB showed how many movies and TV series she worked in even if it was a small role. I'm not going to talk about religions or races because we shouldn't discuss this on Wikipedia all of volunteering her to spread the knowledge and face the raciest, I hope everyone in Wikipedia will understand our goals because some new users still need to stop being racist. Finally, I think her page should be kept. Ahmed Mohi El din (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Highly agree, her "sources" are NOT reliable.
Strong Delete I think this article shouldnt be on wikipedia. She is not important,sources are very unreliable JoelSanchez310 (talk) — JoelSanchez310 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Strong Delete I see where the nominator made his reasoning, Sarah is not a notable person to have their own page on wikipedia as the sources are unreliable. Any person can speak at a TEDx event and that alone is not enough to where that person should have a wikipedia page. The beauty she won was minor and as well does not hold enough significance. AhmedWildooks (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC) — AhmedWildooks (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep I disagree

before we say sources are unreliable we have to read Wikipedia:Verifiability

Magazines
Journals
Mainstream newspapers

completely reliable as a sources for Wikipedia

Any person can speak at a TEDx event this completely not true Bill Clinton and Bill Gates were not any person
- Finally the main idea of the page that she is Actress and Miss Egypt not about YouTube or TEDx so this should be kept.Davidwiki12 (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replying To Davidwiki12: Bill Clinton and Bill Gates spoke at TED, not a TEDx event. TEDx events are non-notable independent events (which is what Sarah spoke at). Her TEDx talk (as most TEDx talks) did not receive strong coverage from multiple notable/reliable sources. TEDx and TED are completely different and mutually exclusive events. Literally anyone can set up a TEDx event (not a TED event). Furthermore, Wikipedias guidelines for notable people ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria ) require SIGNIFICANT coverage from multiple reliable strong sources. Sarah does not have this. Simply being covered by 1 or 2 unknown magazines/websites is not enough to be an entry on Wikipedia. The references/sources in this article are very incredibly weak with no notable/known magazine reporting on anything about her. Doing my own research and still could not find any notable/reliable source reporting about her. Also to note, Ahmed Mohi El din (person who made strong keep vote above) created the article and made the vast majority of edits to the article, and is most likely a Wikipedia Conflict of Interest to keep the article. Megat503 (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

— Megat503 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Megat503 First of all please don't start talk about other users in a bad way if Ahmed Mohi El din is the creator of the page and want to keep it this make sense as usual, you have to discuss with him as we all do not attacking him.

X=independently organized event but it's still TED event and it's not true that anyone can talk at the event.Davidwiki12 (talk) 09:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 :::* Replying To Davidwiki12: Bill Clinton and Bill Gates spoke at [[TED_(conference)|TED]], not a TEDx event. TEDx events are non-notable independent events (which is what Sarah spoke at). Her TEDx talk (as most TEDx talks) did not receive strong coverage from multiple notable/reliable sources. TEDx and TED are completely different and mutually exclusive events. Literally anyone can set up a TEDx event (not a TED event). Furthermore, Wikipedias guidelines for notable people ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria ) require SIGNIFICANT coverage from multiple reliable strong sources. Sarah does not have this. Simply being covered by 1 or 2 unknown magazines/websites is not enough to be an entry on Wikipedia.  The references/sources in this article are very incredibly weak with no notable/known magazine reporting on anything about her. Doing my own research and still could not find any notable/reliable source reporting about her. Also to note, Ahmed Mohi El din (person who made strong keep vote above) created the article and made the vast majority of edits to the article, and is most likely a [[Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest|Wikipedia Conflict of Interest]] to keep the article. [[User:Megat503|Megat503]] ([[User talk:Megat503|talk]]) 20:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 <small>— [[User:Megat503|Megat503]] ([[User talk:Megat503|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Megat503|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small>
+::::[[User:Megat503|Megat503]] First of all please don't start talk about other users in a bad way if [[User:Ahmed Mohi El din|Ahmed Mohi El din]] is the creator of the page and want to keep it this make sense as usual, you have to discuss with him as we all do not attacking him.
+*X=independently organized event but it's still TED event and it's not true that anyone can talk at the event.[[User:Davidwiki12|Davidwiki12]] ([[User talk:Davidwiki12|talk]]) 09:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)