User talk:A930913: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:A930913/Archives/2015/Oct, User talk:A930913/Archives/2015/Nov) (bot |
→BracketBot – {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}: new section |
||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
:{{ping|Hirschfeldt}} Your addition was removed by [[User:Modernist]], as you can see in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impressionism&action=history page history]. My suggestion would be to discuss the question of how many Dutch impressionists should be listed on the article's [[Talk:Impressionism|talk page]]. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 23:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Hirschfeldt}} Your addition was removed by [[User:Modernist]], as you can see in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impressionism&action=history page history]. My suggestion would be to discuss the question of how many Dutch impressionists should be listed on the article's [[Talk:Impressionism|talk page]]. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 23:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
== BracketBot – 69.200.228.170 == |
|||
<!-- Leave this line alone. --> |
|||
<!-- [[User:DoNotArchiveUntil]] 09:18, 15 November 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1763198307}}<span style="display:none;">[[User:A930913]], [[User:Dru_of_Id]], [[User:Bgwhite]]</span> {{User:A930913/BBresolved|no}} |
|||
<!-- What page did BracketBot notify you about? --> |
|||
'''Page:''' |
|||
<!-- Please give a link to the diff if you can. --> |
|||
'''Diff:''' |
|||
<!-- What is your comment/question? --> |
|||
'''Comment/question:''' |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/69.200.228.170|69.200.228.170]] ([[User talk:69.200.228.170|talk]]) 09:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
This was a time-consuming attempt to clean up a few (probably tacit) misimplications in an interesting, but I felt, inadequately and slightly misleading article written some time ago. I believe I've fixed the issue, but please contact me at (Curran.Altschul ...at gmail) [avoiding spambots) if there are further potential issues. Regards to any and all who've put work into this. |
|||
Revision as of 09:18, 18 November 2015
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
 Archives (Index) |
BracketBot – Sardanaphalus
Page: n/a
Diff: n/a
Comment/question: Could BracketBot insert an extra newline before the heading of the message it adds to a user's talkpage, please?
Thank you for a useful aid.
Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
ReferenceBot – Fazbear7891
Page: Wikipedia:Sandbox
Diff: here
Comment/question: ReferenceBot should not check wp:sandbox. Fazbear7891 (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
ReferenceBot – L.tak
Comment/question:
I didn't see any opt out options on your bot-page. Should I use "deny=", or "optout=?" Tnx!
L.tak (talk) 05:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
BracketBot – Parzivalamfortas
Christian Jacq
I tidied it as best I can but not sure if it is perfect. If you can fix it better, much appreciated.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Parzivalamfortas (talk • contribs) 08:27, September 26, 2015 (UTC)
- This has fixed the issue the bot pointed out; you removed the surplus closing square bracket. Thanks! Huon (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
ReferenceBot – Yaakovaryeh
Page:Ishmael
Diff:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=683757934
Comment/question: Bot gave me link to wrong diff page, my errors was made on the next 2 edits (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=683759413 & https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ishmael&diff=next&oldid=683759413) - not the one provided by the bot
Yaakovaryeh (talk) 07:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Right, thanks for notifying A930913 about this issue. If I had to guess, I'd say the bot likely got confused because in that first edit you had a "missing title" error which it would have notified you about; you went on to correct that, but introduced the "archive-url" errors instead in subsequent edits. So the error you were notified and the edit the bot remembered as "first problematic one" apparently no longer matched. Huon (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Impressionism
Hello Mr. A930913,
first thank you for your helpful note.
The reason for my supplement was:
The Dutch Impressionism is very important. There were contacts from Holland to Paris, Barbizon, Brussels, Dusseldorf and Weimar. And it is wrong, if this is not clearly expressed. And this article is incorrect. It lacks the designation of essential artists of the Netherlands during the period of the international flow of impressionism!
And I wanted to heal this very big mistake. - This list is wiped away. I dont know who ist was, it is a bit very stange to wikipedia.uk.Co and me!
Now my question to you, how do we get the cow from the ice?
Many greetings
Hirschfeldt (talk) 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Hirschfeldt: Your addition was removed by User:Modernist, as you can see in the page history. My suggestion would be to discuss the question of how many Dutch impressionists should be listed on the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
BracketBot – 69.200.228.170
Page:
Diff:
Comment/question:
69.200.228.170 (talk) 09:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) This was a time-consuming attempt to clean up a few (probably tacit) misimplications in an interesting, but I felt, inadequately and slightly misleading article written some time ago. I believe I've fixed the issue, but please contact me at (Curran.Altschul ...at gmail) [avoiding spambots) if there are further potential issues. Regards to any and all who've put work into this.