Talk:The Catcher in the Rye

Too Many Links

I was thinking of updating the synopsis, and that's when I discovered that nearly every other noun was linked to another wikipedia article. For example, when it says "Holden went ice skating," does it really need to be linked to Wikipedia's ice skating article? Same thing goes with the words: train, zoo, women, childhood, et cetera. I think all these linked articles take away from the main focus. For example, say someone wanted to know about the plot, do you think they'd want to be sucked into an article about the zoo or ice skating? Anyone else agree with me on this? Regardless, I'm getting rid of these useless links.

Psychiatrist?

"He is in a mental hospital in California near Hollywood and is explaining to a psychiatrist about what had happened after he left Pencey". Is this accurate? I interpreted it as Holden talking to the reader. Not a psychiatrist. Crimson Shadow 22:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

• I agree. I doubt he would be telling all these things to a psychiatrist. I also interpreted it as being to the reader. --V2Blast 23:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Okay, I've changed the sentence. It now reads "He narrates the book from a mental hospital in California near Hollywood, where he is explaining to the reader what had happened after he left Pencey."
• Is that true though? I don't remember anything in the book to support that... IMHO that statement is just too concretely certain of something that can only be called a subjective interpretation. Does anyone have more information on this?
• The mental hospital part is true and the psychiatrist part is not, as can be seen from this sentence in the last chapter: "A lot of people, especially this one psychoanalyst guy they have here, keeps asking me if I'm going to apply myself when I get back to school next September."--Ohnodoctor 02:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

"Taking God's Name in Vain"

The "Sarcasm" section stated that the men unloading the Christmas tree took God's name in vain. Contrary to popular belief, taking God's name in vain does NOT mean swearing. For more info on this see http://www.amen.org.uk/studies/rhj/3rdcomm.htm. I changed it to simply "swearing." Also, the "Style" section in general is sparse. More detail should be added, or the section should be taken out all together.

Cover

Regarding the current Catcher in the Rye cover (white face with colored stripes in upper left hand corner). This cover I have seen since my high school days back in the 60s and my son is now reading it with the same cover. Does anyone know anything about this cover?

• I'm a high school student now too and we had to buy the version you are talking about. It's preferred by schools because it is more compact. I was sorta mad, because the version that I had gotten for Christmas a couple years ago (I love the book) was the hardback orange version, and the school wouldn't let me use it. Peaceman 6 July 2005 20:19 (UTC)

• Actually, J.D. Salinger doesn't want the cover to give away anything about the book, and wanted readers to actually read the book. When he let his son have control over the printing of the book for a short period of time he had one other version (the orange one you are talking about). Salinger changed this, and it is now white with the stripes again. You can thank my LIterature teacher for that.

I'd actually prefer it without the stripes. Maybe just a white cover with embossed lettering. Yeah. It worked for The BEATLES. --Matharvest 10:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Hey guys, on that note, do you want to change the opening image to the white cover? --10:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps we should have both covers. I certainly think it's worth mentioning that Salinger prefers the white cover. Does the article mention that now? I remember learning that when I read Catcher for school. Theshibboleth 23:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Movie reference

Template:Spoiler what? no reference the mel gibson movie conspiracy theory?

Here's the info for anyone who wants to really mention it: Mel Gibson stars in Conspiracy Theory (1997) as a NY cab driver who comes up with random conspiracy theories. One of his suspicions is that CitR is a brainwashing book or something that forces people to be assassins, since both John Hinckley, Jr. (Reagan's would-be assassin) and Mark David Chapman (Lennon's assassin) both had purchased the book/were carrying it/whatever. In the movie, this theory is right, and Gibson's character is persecuted for realizing the truth. Stating that the CitR theory is the correct one would be a major spoiler for the movie, so I'm not sure how best to approach this. --Geoffrey 01:14, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

No, this is wrong. The book has nothing to do with brainwashing in the film, the fact that he collects it is just an extension of his obsessive personality - at least I've never seen any information otherwise.

The way I recall it, Gibson repeatedly buys Catcher because he was brainwashed to. Purchases of Catcher are reported automatically so the government heavies can track such people. This suggests (within the universe of the film) that Chapman and Hinckley were tools of the same government agency. --Tysto 04:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Does the Taxi Driver ever directly reference Catcher or do they just have similar themes? I remember thinkinh of the book while watching the film. Theshibboleth 20:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

There should be a movie of the book - which would be kinda ironic seeing as Holden hates movies, but there should be one all the same. Who agrees? 19 Febuary 2006

I disagree - most of the interesting parts of the book come from Holden's thoughts, which could not be expressed in the movie without long and awkward sequences of a voice actor speaking Holden's thoughts.

Links report

• Exploring The Catcher in the Rye

it doesn't work

Critical Analysis

This article is an oversimplification on this work and is of no kind of NPoV. It spends significant length detailing some of the incidents and refferences to this work without mentioning or alluding to its significance.

For example, it is listed as number two under Radcliffe Publishing Best Novels of the 20th Century.

The analysis in this article is misleading as well.

Someone should clean it up.

May the wind be always at your back, -Empyrealmortal

It is working as of now (11:08, IST)

Mr. Antolini

About Mr. Antolini...it says Holden fears his homosexual advances, but I do believe Holden misreads Mr. Antolini's nuturing, fatherly advances as homosexual. Even in the book Holden states (I can find out where if you like) that he is always afraid of turning into a homosexual...I think it is when he is in the bar...and he talks about homosexuals a bit. I think it is pretty widely accepted that Mr. Antolini's advances were not homosexual - a bit strange perhaps - but misread by Holden.

Also, should mention be made that Holden is relating his tale from some sort of psychiatric hospital - this is evident from the first and last chapter - it adds an interesting aspect to the book.

Also, should the theme section be lengthed and more comprehensive? --Nadsat 23:13, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

There was something strange about Mr. Antolini actions but I don’t remember Holden saying anything which would suggest he was gay. Though he suggests he was sexually abused because after the event with Mr. Antolini he rants about perverts being everywhere and having it happen to him 20 or so times before (he gives an approximation rather then definite number). Before he starts to doubt wether it was Mr Antolini or his own tendency to over evaluate the sexual nature of people’s actions. like people who can’t help but be suspicious of men with young children, as if there radar picked up everything as hyper-sexual because they suffered sexual abuse. I think that’s a definite theme within catcher in the rye. But I agree the themes should be expanded. --Monty Cantsin 03:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

---

But what about the chapter with Carl Luce? According to him, some "flits" "were even married". Carl himself used to go around "goosing" everyone. Could Mr. Antolini's marriage be one of convenience? His wife is described as older and wealthy.

The reader is not actually supposed to know whether Mr. Antolini was making homosexual advances or not. It is not "widely accepted" that Mr. Antolini is heterosexual. Some people think he IS a homosexual pedophile. Others think of your conclusion, Nadsat. Some people just think that Mr. Antolini was incredibly drunk from the several Highballs that he had drank just a couple hours earlier and didn't know what he was doing. These theories all can effectively explain Antolini's behavior, and there is several more out there.

The reader is just as confused about the situation as Holden is. There never is a conclusive answer as to what Mr. Antolini's intentions really were. Absolutely far from "widely accepted".

--S.M. 04:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

---

When reading this scene it is important to keep in mind Mr. Antolini’s observation of Holden, and more importantly the quote he shares with him. “The mark of an immature man…………” Emotionally immature and deeply depressed people often show signs of being confused, angry, and untrusting. It is easy to see how a young man of Holden’s age and mental state could have easily confused a genuine act of kindness and concern as something with devious intent.

-1opinion

---

I believe that Holden A) Misread the 'advances', and B) we are shown that Mr. Antolini is not only an old english teacher but a family friend, Holden's father and Mr.Antolini seem to meet quite often...I think he may have considered Holden as a sort of nephew-like figure and was only caressing him in a loving and respectful way. I also think that the alcohol could have done harm as well yes.

Does anyone else agree with this theory?

--Hal (Guest) Sun Oct 16 2005 11:34 PM

My English teacher does. And further, she suggested that Holden himself might not be entirely secure in his sexual orientation; that perhaps he has latent homosexual desires that he tries to repress. Thus Holden sees Antolini's behavior as a sexual advance because he in fact might be sexually interested in Antolini, but this weirds him out so he leaves. This may also be why he calls someone flitty (sorry for the obscurity, I haven't read the book for a while). His statement that his roomate (again the name escapes me) isn't that bad looking might be seen as revealing homosexual desire. My teacher also stated that because homosexuality was seen as a mental illness at that time, a young man at a mental institution might be seen as homosexual by others. Theshibboleth 21:06, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

---

Please don't use this page to discuss the meaning or value of the work except in the context of what material should go into the article. --Tysto 04:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

To whom is this addressed? Me? Any discussion of the meaning or the value of the work is in the context of improving the article, whether or not it is explicitly stated. That's how peer review works. You introduce a concept and see if it holds weight. If it does not, then it shouldn't be included. If it does then it should be.

---

Antolini is a molestor - stroking your ex pupils head in the middle of the night is not the result of simply being drunk

Ah, but is he? He merely stroked the boys head. Holden is clearly going through a depression, and the book hints of the possibility that he is insane. Antolini is clearly a man wants to help Holden, and as stated, he's quite drunk. Maybe it was a fatherly gesture? On that note, it is very vague. But you cannot simply dismiss him immediatly as a 'molestor'. 24.218.131.28 20:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

---

I think the scene with Mr. Antolini doesn't reveal the teacher's character, but reflects more on Holden's cynical, judging world view. He believes Antolini to be a sick, perverted homosexual, but in reality he is trying to be kind and is more than a little bit drunk. Holden, however, immeadiately jumps to the worst conclusion possible. This reinforces Holden's personality, one that criticizes those who judge and only care about themselves, but is actually one of phonies he hates. Caesar 02:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

antisocial

The word antisocial is often misused to refer to someone with social anxiety.

how is he antisocial?? - Omegatron July 4, 2005 02:17 (UTC)

Yeah, he's always talking to people and stuff, but he's very critical of people's behaviors. He's always calling people "phonies" and such, which to me counts as antisocial behavior. Peaceman 6 July 2005 20:35 (UTC)

"antisocial" means that you have no empathy for the suffering of others and disregard the consequences of your actions. - Omegatron July 6, 2005 21:03 (UTC)

okay, well judging from the fact that Holden calls everyone phonies while in fact he too is one, I'd say he's lacking a little empathy (or he's conceited). Also, he doesn't care about flunking out of a lot of schools, and is not worried about his future. Therefore, I still think that he's antisocial. Peaceman 6 July 2005 21:14 (UTC)

The themes section sounds highly editorialized to me.

I agree - there is altogether too much of the author's analysis of the book.

I think it needs to be taken into account that the author himself was highly anti-social. He fled to Vermont to live in a fenced in compound, completly alone. One idea I have heard, from an English professor, is that the book is somewhat of an auto-biography. That Salinder is living the dream of Holden, to be away from all the 'phonies'. 24.218.131.28 20:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Anime reference

Not sure if this is worth mentioning in an encyclopedia, but the Anime "Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex", which is a tv series that was created after the original movie (but I'm not enough of a fan to tell you how it relates to the manga). It's main plot involves a skillfull hacker who identifies himself with the Catcher in the Rye. The hackers psuedonym is "The laughing man", and he hides his identity behind a laughing face with words inscribed around it: "What I thought I'd do is pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes". Additionally, he hides himself in a mental hospital (as a deaf mute no less), and his only give away is that his favorite possession is a catcher's mitt. --Gryn 04:24, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Fixing up Wikipedia style

The Plot Synposis and a couple of character descriptions need Wikified. The plot synposis about halfway through veers straight off of the road, and a few character descriptions could use fixin ('Lillian Simmons....she has very big knockers') MardukZero 09:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Done. --Tysto 04:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Mark David Chapman/John Lennon

The article currently states, "Mark David Chapman, murderer of musician John Lennon, was carrying the book when he was arrested immediately after the murder and referred to it in his statement to police shortly thereafter, but oddly John Lennon was reading the book when killed." However, the cited link says nothing about Lennon reading The Catcher in the Rye, just Chapman. Can anyone verify that Lennon was reading the book at the time of his death? --Metropolitan90 07:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Additionally, I believe the character named "George Andover" in this article was just a person named "George" who went to Andover college in the book. If this can be confirmed, please change it. --a nonmember of wikipedia, 7 november 2005

I'm confused. This article currently states that Mark Chapman only started reading the book after he'd killed Lennon. But it also carries a reference section link to a fairly silly Crime Library site ("Mark Chapman had met Holden Caulfield. Or was it the other way around?") that shows or purports to show Chapman's testimony to the effect that he'd bought a copy that morning and carried it while he was committing the crime. But the "Murder of Lennon" section of the Mark Chapman wikipedia article (which has no citations) just says he was carrying his copy of Double Fantasy. Rose H.

Brain washing?

The main article mentions suspicions that Catcher in the Rye was use for mind control purposes by the FBI. This seems very odd, considering the book is controversial possibly to the point of being subversive and certainly to the point of getting banned. Does anyone know anything about this? Johnsmy 82.1.229.53 12:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

-gemminten- I removed the FBI and CIA brainwashing junk because it was not NPOV and not cited. I also removed the James Dean movie poster as this book has nothing to do with the movie he starred in

B.S.

Up in "Wrong info/missing info", someone wrote "Also, should mention be made that Holden is relating his tale from some sort of psychiatric hospital - this is evident from the first and last chapter - it adds an interesting aspect to the book." Back in my last year of highschool English, we spent a lengthy discussion looking at whether Holden is telling the truth at the psych ward or simply bullshitting to whomever's listening. I think this is worth mentioning, but I'm not sure if anyone else has come across this argument, or where it would fit in the article. --Matharvest 10:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

• I am pretty sure that in the last chapter he discusses that he's been "here" for a while since that incident, so would probably allude to him being at a psychiatric ward. However, as I stated in the first section of this talk, I think he's just talking to the reader. --V2Blast 23:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Antolini in charecter list?

• He's already there. --V2Blast 23:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Title?

Maybe add the reason why the novel is called "Catchder in the rye?" I just read it and it's apparently about a wrongly quoted line of a poem and Holden thinking about what he wants to do in his life, saving children? (131.130.121.106 16:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC))

Done. --Tysto 04:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

conspiracy is pretzel logic

i think the conspiracy stuff is only conspiracy and not real. I love the book, because I can really relate to Holden. Everything that he feels is what I feel for the most part, we have the same problems and everything. A lot of people out there are the same way. However, from what I've noticed, it seems anyone who can't relate to the book dislikes it greatly. There doesnt seem to be much in between, in general people seem to fully relate and love it (like me) or just not get it, and hate it. The social groups of the people generally reflect this, such as the "popular" kids (who seem to have trouble relating) and the "outcasts" or even just regular kids. In general, socio and psychopaths are outcasts, plain and simple. Almost all the people you read about who do horrible things have some sort of antisocial background or highly traumatizing experience. It doesnt defend what they did, but it definantly is a factor. For example, John Lennon's killer (like Charles Manson or JFK's killer) was probably just, simply put, a loser. They see someone who has everything they dont and they look at thier own lives which are pathetic in comparison and they probably already have some sort of mental disorder. This combined is not good at all. However, this doesnt mean all "unpopular" people are psychopaths and this book is great for anyone who can relate to it (which is a lot of the population). It lets those of us out there who dont have a cookie-cutter American apple-pie life realize we arent alone. But this doesnt mean we're all crazy, in fact we're the ignored majority. Very few people have the type of life everyone wants to emulate, but if it werent for things like this book, a lot of people would feel very depressed, lost, and failed. --insertwackynamehere 23:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Effort to clean up Characters section

I made an effort to clean up the "Characters" section. It still needs considerable work, though. Some of the character descriptions really need overhaul, but I can't do that right now. Since it was a mess, I divided it up into three sections: Protagonist, Holden's Siblings, and Major Supporting Characters. Admittedly what separates a major supporting character from a minor character is something of a judgment call. The standard I used was this: if an entire chapter was (more or less) dedicated to Holden's interaction with them, then they're a major character. Hence the inclusion of borderline cases such as Faith Cavendish and Mrs. Morrow.

I originally had four sections, including a "Minor Characters" section, but I think the page would be better served if we just forgot the Minor Characters altogether. Really, Mr. Haas, for instance, is mentioned in one paragraph in the whole novel. What good does it to do include him on the page, whether you've read the book or not? If anyone really disputes this and wishes to restore it, here's the list of Minor Characters I deleted:

• George Andover. George Andover is a close friend of Sally Hayes. Sally and George accidentally meet at a theater, while Holden is on a date with Sally. Holden becomes increasingly bitter towards George while George and Sally have conversations during the intermissions.
• Ernie. Ernie is a Black virtuoso pianist at a bar in New York. Holden believes that Ernie is a phony because he puts too many frills into his playing and accepts all the fulsome praise that he receives with false humility.
• Horwitz. Horwitz is a cab driver that picks up Holden. They have a conversation about where ducks go in winter (a predominant symbol in the novel).
• Lillian Simmons. Lillian Simmons is an old friend of D.B. Caulfield, whom Holden runs into at a bar that the three of them used to frequent. Holden regards her as a phony, too.
• Arthur Childs. Holden recalls a conversation with Arthur Childs, whom he knew at Whooton. The two shared an interest in tennis, and converse about the sport. Eventually Arthur changes the subject, asking where the nearest Catholic Church is located--in an attempt, according to Holden, to ascertain whether or not Holden is Catholic. Holden says it made their conversation much worse.
• James Castle. Holden remembers James Castle, a boy who jumped out a window while Holden is attending Whooton. Holden is taking a shower when he hears Castle fall. Holden assumes that it was a desk or a radio, but heads downstairs and finds Castle's bloody corpse on the pavement as well as observers gathered around it. Mr. Antolini is the only person at the whole scene who comes near Castle's body. Antolini checks Castle's pulse, then puts his coat over Castle, and carries the corpse to the infirmary.
• Phil Stabile. Phil Stabile is responsible for James Castle's suicide. James Castle had called Stabile "conceited" in a conversation with someone else, and Stabile eventually heard about it. Stabile gathered a gang of his friends to confront Castle. When they break into his room, Castle refuses to take back his comment, even as they torture and humiliate him. He ends up jumping out of the dorm room window. Stabile and their friends are expelled for the death, but Holden wonders why they didn't have to go to jail.
• Mal Brossard. Mal is an acquaintance of Holden's. Holden and Ackley go to see a movie with Mal on Holden's last night at Pencey.
• Mr. Haas. Mr. Haas is headmaster at Elkton Hills. Holden remembers him as a big phony, because he would not talk to parents who were "funny-looking" at open houses.
• Selma Thurmer. Selma Thurmer is the daughter of Dr. Thurmer, the headmaster of Pencey Prep. She goes to Pencey's football games often. Holden fondly remembers having a conversation with her on a bus from Agerstown. Even though she was a bit homely, she didn't seem phony; she didn't pretend her father was a big-shot, according to Holden.

StarryEyes 23:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Removed Faith and Mrs. Morrow from the Major supporting characters section. I don't believe that they played much of a role in the story, certainly not major. --V2Blast 23:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Oh, and I removed the reference that Carl might be homosexual, I didn't notice anything of the sort in the novel (except maybe that he's unwilling to talk about sex, but I'd be uncomfortable talking to another guy about sex, too). And, on a different note, I think the only major character in the novel is Holden himself, but there are other characters, so they have to be included. --V2Blast 23:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Cultural References

I think a lot of songs/movies/tv shows refer to this book. Do you think the only relevant cultural reference is the American Idiot album by Green Day because of their similar plots?

Removing all indirect references, allusions, similarities. This section was kind of bloated. Ronabop 14:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the sugestion at the top - Billie Joe Armstrong says that the book is his best book, and a song on the Green Day album 'kerplunk' is called "who wrote Holden Caulfield?" in American Idiot the story of the book fits - running away, teenage angst, having trouble with women etc.

I decided to be bold and cut about 2/3 of the references, following some simple guidelines: (a) mentions in major, major media - exceedingly popular songs; (b) cultural references where the book actually serves a plot purpose or is discussed. I trimmed (a) non-notable bands, (b) passing references to the book (i.e. an episode of "Family Guy" where you have to read the credits at the end to get a kind of abstract joke that tangentially involves the book was cut, original research on Kevin Smith's character names in Chasing Amy was cut, references to song lyrics that mention Catcher in the Rye in passing were cut. I can almost guarantee this will all be reverted by an Offspring fan or something, but I tried. --MattShepherd 14:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

And again. I can see this will be a hobby of mine. For some reason, as soon as somebody notices that their favourite band says "Holden" or "Salinger" in a song, they feel strangely obliged to add it to this already-rather-large-list...--MattShepherd 20:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I am doing a report on The Catcher in the Rye for school and was rather shocked that some of the major music refrences were deleted from the list. In my opinion, if the list has grown too large it should split off onto an article of its own and not be thined out. I restored some of the refrences that I have used in my report and added another that I feel is siginficant. If the list is too long then a separate article is probably best, it would allow there to be groups of movie, TV, and song refrences. --jjhat1 21:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Source of Conflict

Any dispute over The Catcher in the Rye has to do about low class society and falling in society by the reported vices in the book (most societies practice public virtue and private vice, and many readers take it personal as if they actually witnessed it making vice public to the mind while falling in society), and any protagonist reported is not expected to have a good future. The interesting thing about society is most society has two parts and that is upper and lower class with the upper class controlling politics, and often the upper class do not want their children exposed to reality with the twist that book is set in New York City that has a lot of reality and hard stories: the high handed attitude people have with status is amazing when dealing with people considered low class where, by example, low class teenagers who play pranks have a good chance to go to prison while high class teenagers who play pranks are simply excused as being boys who are growing up. People do not always like to hear about misery, and in this 21st century it is ridiculous to point out old nefarious attitude to control print, because now you have Oprah, Jerry Springer, Dr. Phil, Rap Music, and decades of daytime soap operas that have wallowed in misery and bringing shame to the public attention as entertainment for the rest of us. Daytime soap opera got away with wickedness, because they portray wealthy people problems, so they are not low class and are considered healthy enough to deal with their wickedness and entertain everyone else. The New York City based television series Sex in the City that is about four women exploring sexual issues, and gets away with it, because the women are wealthy, so they are exercising choice without the label whores. The book The Catcher in the Rye is about low class society, and people want it censored as a result, because low class society is actively being put down and kept down. The modern Internet and all of the reported reality has changed perception for United States society, so it may become a classic.

By what standard is Holden Caulfield a member of "low class society" (in economic terms)? Keep in mind that he attended a private boarding school. --Metropolitan90 08:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Actually, Holden makes it clear in the novel that his parents are fairly wealthy. --V2Blast 23:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Remove Tag?

It seems that this entry has been significantly improved since the rewrite tag was added. Any thoughts on removing it? Ionesco 16:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Character List

I noticed that the character list from a long time ago was just deleted for no reason in the middle of the history. I am going to put it back for now but it probably should be removed again if there was a real reason for its removal --jjhat1 21:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

External links

I think some of the external links are dubious. --Fasten 18:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• The Catcher in the Rye and Related Matters
  • WP:EL: Is it proper (useful, tasteful, etc.)? (see also: Talk:It_Could_Happen_to_You#External_links)
• Yahoo!'s Catcher in the Rye Section
  • [1] would be preferrable, according to WP:EL: When deemed appropriate by those contributing to an article on Wikipedia, a link to one web directory listing can be added, with preference to open directories (if two are comparable and only one is open).
• Slashdoc : The Catcher in the Rye Analytical essays of the novel
  • WP:EL: Is it proper (useful, tasteful, etc.)?
  • WP:EL: For albums, movies, books: one or two links to professional reviews which express some sort of general sentiment.

Carl Luce's College

Carl Luce went to Princeton in the book, not Columbia University.

I change some incorrect info

There was a part where the article says it was implied Holden had sex with Jane. This is false because Holden has only kissed her after an emotional outburst from her caused by her step father. Holden admits in his narration that he is a virgin, and that he would like to practice on the prostitute. Yami 01:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Nice division of cultural references...

Thanks to whoever did it! I think the section is manageable in size, but I just gave the songs section a haircut... I don't think MENTIONING the words "Catcher in the Rye" is a "notable cultural reference." Just as some f'rinstances -- naming characters in Chasing Amy is notable (I'm still not convinced it's not original reasearch, but that would be a devil of a coincidence). "Some guy in the background of this movie is reading the book" is not notable. The Green Day song mentioned is obviously a long Catcher-themed ode, but saying somebody said "Holden Caulfield" in a throwaway line of a song isn't. I'm not trying to be a pissant, but there's a significant difference between Catcher INFLUENCING a cultural work and Catcher BEING MENTIONED IN PASSING in a cultural work. I'd like to stick to the former and avoid the latter, lest the article balloon to ridiculous size. --MattShepherd 19:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I think that they are starting to clutter the article, and I don't think they are of particular use to the article. Shouldn't we be a bit more selctive weith what is included here? 195.93.21.40 16:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

NPOV in "Motifs" and "Style"

These two sections are filled with unsourced POV proclamations about what themes various symbols in the book represent, and how they are to be interpreted. This is an encyclopedia article, not a high school English essay. I don't know enough about published criticism of The Catcher in the Rye to fix it myself, and some of the text there may be useful, so I'm not taking it out yet, in the hopes that the original authors or someone else knowledgable about the subject will improve it. Kwertii 00:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

What about school students who use wikipedia? Maybe this sort of stuff would be better in wikibooks. 195.93.21.40 18:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Phoebus Apollo

"The Greek God of the sun, Apollo, was also known as Phoebus Apollo. Thus, a clear connection arises between Holden's sister, Phoebe, and Maurice's prostitute, Sunny."

That... seems like a stretch to me. Can anyone source it? --Szabo 03:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey, a random vandal agrees with me. I've gone ahead and removed it. --Szabo 19:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Pratfalls of an Unreliable Narrator

The post states that "the criticisms that Holden aims at people around him are also aimed at himself"; a claim which I believe to be not necessarily true.

Even though Holden appears to be a very self-aware and sensitive, he never once interacts with issues of self-condemnation or passes judgment upon himself as he does on those around him. That is an important distinction to make. Holden may or may not be aware that he is as huge a jerk as he makes his roommates seem (after all, he's the one that starts the fight with Stradlater, he's the one that doesn't pick up on Ackley's hints to leave after complaining that Ackley does the same), but he certainly doesn't dwell on them or go into any sort of painful self-criticism. No matter how much we find ourselves sympathizing with Hodlen's struggles we cannot easily divorce him from these hypocritical faults. Holden is not a clean and easy character to affiliate with. I think that's where the book has its power: while we cheer Holden's cynical struggle against the phonies and the bullies, the posers and the jerks, we are complicit in his own posing, his own bullying. To embrace his rebelliousness we must also embrace the ideals and subjective reality. It is, then, a revelatory moment when the reader realizes that Holden isn't just being "misunderstood" but, instead, is also "misunderstanding" the world around him ("she was right, though [...] though I didn't know it then" after all [173]). When we figure out that Holden isn’t necessarily a trustworthy narrator (nor a particularly attractive one), we are forced to question the trustworthiness of his ideals and the valor of his rebellion and, subsequently, our own attraction to it. Circumstantially, Holden doesn't care. But we do. And, for better or worse, it drives us wild. That's the tension.

All that to say that Holden isn't necessarily interested in self-criticism. He may be self-aware and very self conscious, but, even as (or maybe "especially because he's") an unreliable narrator, the text shows us that he doesn't really care about such blatantly apparent hypocrisies. However, to bring up the untrustworthy narrator opens up a whole other set of issues that there isn't quite space here to interact with...

...yet that reminds me to note that the opening paragraph of the "Motifs" section seems a tad unnecessary. All of the motifs discussed are well received in the academic world; nothing is really outlandish enough to warrant a disclaimer. But what really piqued my interest was that the introduction suggests that the lack of knowable authorial intent directly lead to the polyphony of possible interpretations, which is untrue. Authorial intent, though a valuable insight into possible meanings of the text is merely another interpretation: no more privileged than the next and must be balanced by the text itself and may or may not eradicate other possible interpretations supported by the text.

Serialization

Auggiebjorn left this note on the article page where it was deleted. I'm moving it here in case anyone has further information. -- MarkBuckles 03:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

WHOEVER IS IN CHARGE OF EDITING THIS PAGE, THE FIRST SENTENCE OF THIS ENTRY IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE. THE CATCHER IN THE RYE WAS NOT SERIALIZED. THE BOOKS ADDITION IS THE FIRST EDITION. I AM AN ANTIQUARIAN BOOK DEALER, AND SALINGER'S RECOGNIZED OFFICIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY STATES NO SERIALIZATION OF THIS BOOK.

well, you are in charge of editing this page as much as anyone... -- frymaster 15:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

okay, went looking for a citation and can find nothing other than this article that makes a serialization claim. i've removed it. -- frymaster 14:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

bold deletes

there has been a move by EnglishDiva to delete the following from this article:

1. supporting characters
2. cultural references
3. trivia
4. memorable quotes

this is pretty dramatic and reduces the size of the article by almost half, so i have reverted it pending some input from the editors here. personally, i'm inclined to think it's a good idea. the article is getting long and stuff like cultural references and trivia, while interesting, should be kept to a minimum or eliminated to avoid cruftiness. -- frymaster 14:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I think that the list of characters should be increased to included almost every chracter even if they only get a line. If you look at the article for Catch 22 whoever wrote the page made it clear exectaly who everyone in the novel was.However, the cultural references just clutter the article and I can't imagine that they are of any use to people searching for Catcher in the Rye in wikipedia. I wouldn't mind seeing them all deleted really.

Quotes maybe move into wikiqutoes?

Keep the trivia as I imagine that most people know the book as the one which John Lennon's assassin mentions. 195.93.21.40 16:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The culturual references is good for people doing critical essays and the like, which is people come to such things as this. Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 23:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

okay, i can get behind keeping the characters... but i just went a reread a lot of the cultural references stuff and, maybe it's just that i'm out of touch with the mainstream world or something, but they mostly seem remarkably superficial and tangential -- for instance, the jay and silent bob / kevin smith one seems farfetched. also, some of the trivia seems super trivial... winnona ryder's favourite book and all. now, having said all that, i also think that the lennon assasination angle and the banning/challenging angle are under represneted. i'm willing to work on expanding that, but i still think trivia and cultural references should be trimmed down. -- frymaster 23:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Could we give the cultural refereneces their own article which would both trim the article and allow people to list as many references as they like? 195.93.21.40 12:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Black? Jewish?

Is Holden black? 24.253.92.226 16:50, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't remember any reference to Holden's ethnicity in Catcher in the Rye.

I have always thought he was Jewish, myself. If you reread it, he may very well have been Jewish. But Black?

2nd most taught book in highschool

2nd most taught book in highschool -what is the source to this claim? (I am interested in which is the first most book)

I think its the lord of the flies but thats a guess

orbit

Why is the word "orbit" chosen here? Hackwrench 04:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Relevance of Holden being a smoker?

"Because he smokes, is overly critical, and because of the fact that he points out faults of people only to exhibit them later, Holden is widely considered to be an unreliable narrator, the details and events of his story are apt to be distorted by his point of view."

What has that got to do with anything? Can it be removed please? (I'm new to this, tell me if it's ok and I'd go ahead and remove it!). Thewilk 23:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

First/Second Person?

From what point of view is The Catcher in the Rye written? In the article, it explicitly states first person - and I have to disagree. Holden makes liberal use of the word "you"... indicating to me that it should be second person, not first.