Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scott Treatment Des Concierge: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:25, 10 December 2015

The Scott Treatment Des Concierge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written by paid contributor, which appears to fail the notability guidelines. What coverage does exist seems to mostly be based solely on press releases. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have checked the Hollywood Reporter article listed as a source, using Nexis. The extent of the coverage of The Scott in the article is as follows: "(Interestingly, the facilities report a recent decline in cocaine addiction among local clients, with a rise in prescription pain killers. Says Kat Conway, owner of The Scott,"I have people that come in on 15 to 30 medications," including Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Klonopin, Oxycontin and Percocet.)". Cordless Larry (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as there's not even anything for general notability. Notifying tagger TheInformativePanda in case they're interested to comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys! I understand Wikipedia has many policies, but I have noticed that other private rehabilitation centres, such as Passages Malibu, have a Wiki article. I do not quite understand what the issue with this one is. Please let me know.--Kalina3112 (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The concern is the subject's notability, Kalina3112. To summarise, articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. If there are similar articles that fail to meet this requirement, then they will have to be looked at, but their existence doesn't really have a bearing here. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I've checked Passages Malibu and it cites some sources that go some way to demonstrating notability. For example, this, this and this cover the topic in some depth. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. --Kalina3112 (talk) 11:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for tagging me in this deletion. I feel that at this present time, the article mostly reads like an advertisement and really does not belong on Wikipedia, unless it it pretty much completely rewritten. TheInformativePanda (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::For what it's worth, I've checked [[Passages Malibu]] and it cites some sources that go some way to demonstrating notability. For example, [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/fashion/an-intervention-for-malibu.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 this], [http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/09/local/me-rehab9/3 this] and [http://www.laweekly.com/news/addiction-buying-the-cure-at-passages-malibu-2154136 this] cover the topic in some depth. [[User:Cordless Larry|Cordless Larry]] ([[User talk:Cordless Larry|talk]]) 09:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 Thank you for the explanation. --[[User:Kalina3112|Kalina3112]] ([[User talk:Kalina3112|talk]]) 11:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
-Thank you for tagging me in this deletion. I fee that at this present time, the article mostly reads like an advertisement and really does not belong on Wikipedia, unless it it pretty much completely rewritten. [[User:TheInformativePanda|TheInformativePanda]] ([[User talk:TheInformativePanda|talk]]) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
+Thank you for tagging me in this deletion. I feel that at this present time, the article mostly reads like an advertisement and really does not belong on Wikipedia, unless it it pretty much completely rewritten. [[User:TheInformativePanda|TheInformativePanda]] ([[User talk:TheInformativePanda|talk]]) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)