Talk:Predictions and claims for the Second Coming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:59, 6 January 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Predictions and claims for the Second Coming article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion List‑class

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christianity: Jesus / Latter Day Saints List‑class Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
	Latter Day Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Theology List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Undated predictions

Can anyone explain why undated predictions should be mentioned. Almost all Christians believe Christ will return at some point - an undated prediction is not helpful in an article like this. Any objections to me removing them? Freikorp (talk) 12:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the undated predictions as I believe these are completely pointless. Freikorp (talk) 03:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claimants

While we're at it, the 'Claimants' section also seems pointless to me. These mentions should either be integrated into the table or removed entirely. These mentions belong at List of people who have claimed to be Jesus (which is already mentioned in the 'see also' section, making it even more pointless to list certain people who claimed to be Jesus here). Any objections to removing that as well? Freikorp (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I propose we move this article to "List of predicted dates for the Second Coming of Christ", or something along those lines. I have recently removed the "Claimants" section as this information is available in much better detail as "List of people who have claimed to be Jesus". As this article is now accordingly just a list of dates I propose the name change. Comments or objections? Freikorp (talk) 03:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium

There were already two predictions of Christ's Millennium in the article, so I have decided to add many more, with a disclaimer in the intro paragraph explaining that there are different theories as to when the Millennium is believed to occur in relation to the Second Coming. Any comments regarding this are welcome. Freikorp (talk) 23:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prediction deleted

The only prediction that will come to pass... and censors here deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.207.214 (talk) 05:50, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is the value of this wiki page without context explanation?

May I suggest that someone adds the required context to place this in perspective, please? There are references in the Bible, like the book of Revelation I guess. Also Rudolf Steiner explains why the Bible texts cannot be understood in literal form with our current rational intellect (see the loss of Logos around 4th century), and why the second coming of Christ can never be a physical incarnation not just will be - but actually already is - in the etheric. The dozens of lectures given on the subject appear to me to be more informative than a listing which does not say what is meant and why. Especially empty statements by any person for any reason don't appear to be of very much value listing: who cares what unqualified people scream or state? The point is: these matters are not so easy to understand or make sense of without deeper study, at the level of empty popularized phrases they are of no meaning.