Talk:Battle of Ko Chang: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:46, 10 January 2016

Military history: Maritime / Asian / European / French / Southeast Asia / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	World War II task force

Thailand Start‑class Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.btinternet.com/~david.manley/naval/genquar/kohchang.htm. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006030610007073.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Untitled

I am the copyright holder for this article - David Manley

Are you licensing your work under the GNU Free Documentation License? If so, my apologies and I will remove the copyright violation notice, or you can do it yourself. Geoff/Gsl 08:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff, yes I am - could yu do it? I don't know how to :(

Copyright (c) 2006 David Manley Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".

Thai history

I added many fact claimed by Royal Thai Navy. Some are not match with france history. Analayo 04:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV?

Is it just me or is this article written from French POV? -- Adeptitus 22:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Place name

Satahib seems should be Sattahip - at the southern tip of Chonburi Province.

Mori Riyo (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major revision needed

The article was created based on information from the French perspective, which contained the mistaken inclusion of the Sri Ayudhya and an extra torpedo boat in the battle. Most English-language sources repeat this mistake, in effect over-emphasising the French victory as they were (incorrectly) regarded as very outnumbered. Some of these details had been corrected, but most of the text hadn't been modified accordingly, and none of the article body is cited to a reliable source. The article needs to be thoroughly reworked to present facts from both sides as well as the discrepancies. It should also discuss the resulting differing analyses, with Western sources describing it as a decisive French victory, while Thai sources insist that the French failed to strategically achieve what they set out to. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note that explains the argument for both sides, but parts of the body article may still need some revision. 67.232.21.14 (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:02, 26 November 2014 edit 64.6.124.31 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:46, 10 January 2016 edit undo 67.232.21.14 (talk) →Major revision needed Next edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:

	The article was created based on information from the French perspective, which contained the mistaken inclusion of the ''Sri Ayudhya'' and an extra torpedo boat in the battle. Most English-language sources repeat this mistake, in effect over-emphasising the French victory as they were (incorrectly) regarded as very outnumbered. Some of these details had been corrected, but most of the text hadn't been modified accordingly, and none of the article body is cited to a reliable source. The article needs to be thoroughly reworked to present facts from both sides as well as the discrepancies. It should also discuss the resulting differing analyses, with Western sources describing it as a decisive French victory, while Thai sources insist that the French failed to strategically achieve what they set out to. --[[User:Paul 012\|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012\|talk]]) 15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)		The article was created based on information from the French perspective, which contained the mistaken inclusion of the ''Sri Ayudhya'' and an extra torpedo boat in the battle. Most English-language sources repeat this mistake, in effect over-emphasising the French victory as they were (incorrectly) regarded as very outnumbered. Some of these details had been corrected, but most of the text hadn't been modified accordingly, and none of the article body is cited to a reliable source. The article needs to be thoroughly reworked to present facts from both sides as well as the discrepancies. It should also discuss the resulting differing analyses, with Western sources describing it as a decisive French victory, while Thai sources insist that the French failed to strategically achieve what they set out to. --[[User:Paul 012\|Paul_012]] ([[User talk:Paul 012\|talk]]) 15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


			I've added a note that explains the argument for both sides, but parts of the body article may still need some revision. [[Special:Contributions/67.232.21.14\|67.232.21.14]] ([[User talk:67.232.21.14\|talk]]) 16:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)