Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Belkin: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
r |
AnGeloAnoJan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::Neither one is a IP-the article creator has the same name as the girl who the article is about-and the major contributor is another new person. [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 05:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
:::Neither one is a IP-the article creator has the same name as the girl who the article is about-and the major contributor is another new person. [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 05:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
::::Oops, I missed that, didn't look far enough back in history. Looks like using multiple accounts in attempt to avoid scrutiny that the article is likely an autobiography. Of course an account named after an actress could just be a fan... [[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] ([[User talk:Geraldo Perez|talk]]) 05:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
::::Oops, I missed that, didn't look far enough back in history. Looks like using multiple accounts in attempt to avoid scrutiny that the article is likely an autobiography. Of course an account named after an actress could just be a fan... [[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] ([[User talk:Geraldo Perez|talk]]) 05:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''- This article needs improvements. Let's contribute to it and improve the article [[User:AnGeloAnoJan|AnGeloAnoJan]] ([[User talk:AnGeloAnoJan|talk]]) 04:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:41, 1 February 2016
- Jessica Belkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I would of done a blp prod, but technically there is a ref-anyway non notable actress that is also a autobio. Wgolf (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR with basically one notable role, and WP:GNG as references save one are passing mentions with no details. One is a fluff piece interview in a dubious source. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment-possible sockpuppetry going on in the article-check the only 2 major contributors and there history. Wgolf (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Likely just forgot to log in, obviously not familiar with wiki. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neither one is a IP-the article creator has the same name as the girl who the article is about-and the major contributor is another new person. Wgolf (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, I missed that, didn't look far enough back in history. Looks like using multiple accounts in attempt to avoid scrutiny that the article is likely an autobiography. Of course an account named after an actress could just be a fan... Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Neither one is a IP-the article creator has the same name as the girl who the article is about-and the major contributor is another new person. Wgolf (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Likely just forgot to log in, obviously not familiar with wiki. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment- This article needs improvements. Let's contribute to it and improve the article AnGeloAnoJan (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)