Jump to content

User talk:Typhoon2013: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Bot: Notice of potential reference breaking
Manual archive of 11 discussions to User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive4; adds up to 45 discussions in that page just like other archivepages
Line 3: Line 3:


'''If you want to put awards like barnstars, please put them [[User talk:Typhoon2013/Barnstars|here]].'''
'''If you want to put awards like barnstars, please put them [[User talk:Typhoon2013/Barnstars|here]].'''

== Merry Christmas ==

Hi Typhoon2013, I just wanted to stop by and wish you a very Merry Christmas and all the best for 2016. Me and other older editors value your contributions to the current storm articles, though I personally wish you would add a tropical low as soon as you see the words '''Tropical Low''' in BoM's TWO's.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 01:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

== It looks like there is a problem with your talk page archives ==

Hello Typhoon 2013. Welcome back to Wikipedia! I just started browsing through your talk page archives for fun today and I think I found a problem. In Archive 2, all the discussions up to April 13, 2015 were supposed to come there, but even present discussions (December 2015) are going there. Then your normal talk page is Archive 3. So on your normal talk page, I see at the top a note that is saying that this page is only an archive for previous discussions. I made an edit to move all the discussions dated after April 13, 2015 to Archive 3 when I encountered that problem. So I reverted my edit and decided to talk to you. Could you tell me what's going on? Maybe we could fix the problem. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/73.223.175.207|73.223.175.207]] ([[User talk:73.223.175.207|talk]]) 01:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|73.223.175.207}} Hi. I should've fixed this several days ago but just to be aware that I was on holiday, that's the reason why I could not edit in wiki. Yes, my talk page is a mess and thanks for your help, I can handle this. This is because a bot used to archive my talk messages, but now I put a code in my talk pages so no bots would archive them. But I may put him back soon. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 05:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
::Okay, I don't understand what is happening. You said that you removed the bot from archiving your talk page. But when I looked in the edit history, I saw that [[User:Lowercase sigmabot III|Lowercase sigmabot III]] archived 2 discussions to [[User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive2|Archive 2 of your talk pages]]. Didn't you remove the code? In order to fix the talk pages I will need you to remove it. Archive 2 is getting too big.

::So after some thinking I decided that you need to create a page called User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive3. There we can move all the discussions dated after April 13. (It looks like your normal talk page is the same as the Archive 3. It shouldn't be like that.) Also please delete the page you created called [[User:Typhoon2013/Archive1]] as it is a copy of [[User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive1]] and is not needed. It must have been created by accident. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/73.223.175.207|73.223.175.207]] ([[User talk:73.223.175.207|talk]]) 00:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
:::{{ping|73.223.175.207}} First of all, why are we talking about this. It is my (or a bot's job) to this not someone else since this is my user and talk page (otherwise, if you or someone is going to leave me a message or award). Second, I can fix this. But thanks for mentioning Archive 2 for me. Yes I will figure something out. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 00:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
::::Well, since I had nothing better to on Wikipedia I decided to help you fix that talk page problem. (I like helping people.) It's good the job got mostly done. Only if you could do one last thing and delete [[User:Typhoon2013/Archive1]] (reason given in my above comment) it would be great. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/73.223.175.207|73.223.175.207]] ([[User talk:73.223.175.207|talk]]) 04:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

::::Sorry I have to still bother you, but could you quickly put an <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:db-u1|db-u1]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> template on [[User:Typhoon2013/Archive1]] so that I can ask an admin like Cyclonebiskit to delete it? Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/73.223.175.207|73.223.175.207]] ([[User talk:73.223.175.207|talk]]) 03:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

== My bad ==

Pardon the revert, misunderstood your edit summary. Noticed that you meant it to mean 1995 after seeing the edit to that article. ~ [[User:Cyclonebiskit|Cyclonebiskit]] ([[User talk:Cyclonebiskit|chat]]) 08:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Cyclonebiskit}} No, no sorry. It was me. I accidentally type 'now' instead of 'not'. I am a fast typer here as well and you may see some mistakes so keep that in mind. :) -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 09:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

== Wrong image ==

Hi, I have manually reverted your upload as the image you uploaded for 07F was the wrong storm. According to RSMC Nadi the storm was near 18.4 S 177.7 E at 0500Z on Jan 1. The image you uploaded was centered near 29.7 S 166.4 E which is nowhere near the center described by RSMC Nadi. I have since replaced the image with the one I captured earlier.[[User:Damien4794|Damien4794]] ([[User talk:Damien4794|talk]]) 09:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Damien4794}} Sorry. Does that mean I have 06F's image? Or is the image I uploaded is just a low? -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 10:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Typhoon2013}}That's probably not 06F but some extratropical low in the AOR of Wellington. However, I remember as I was tracking these storms 05F (precursor to Ula) and 06F were very close to each other (within 2 or 3 degrees). It is crucial not to get these storms confused. For my initial image of 06F I had taken TWOs from Nadi (now already deleted from the gwydir archives) and tried to calculate its position using some math and centered it accurately on the storm center. For your part, try not to upload or enhance these images because the storm you captured for 06F might just as well be the precursor to Ula. It is now very difficult to distinguish them (05F and 06F) since the TWOs from last year are not easily accessible, and I have yet to verify that (your 06F image) it is indeed 06F. For 07F … yes that's 07F all right. Good job! But please verify and double check these storms whenever you are uploading images of them so that you do not confuse them.[[User:Damien4794|Damien4794]] ([[User talk:Damien4794|talk]]) 09:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for January 16==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[2015–16 Australian region cyclone season]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Darwin]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2015%E2%80%9316_Australian_region_cyclone_season check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2015%E2%80%9316_Australian_region_cyclone_season fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

== Australian region ==

I have found data for all 3 storms, though it's from rather a ragbag of sources. The normal NRL data dump wasn't carrying TRACKFILEs at the time (it's working OK now). Archived bulletins are listed on the talk page.--[[User:Keith Edkins|Keith Edkins]] <small>( [[User talk:Keith Edkins|Talk]] )</small> 18:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Keith Edkins}} That's alright, and thank you so much! You should know that the BoM is stupid when tracking TLs. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 20:02, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

==South-West IO==
You reported me. I literally went to the page and the information was near 24 hour out of date. It had a notification on it saying that the information was out of date. So, I gathered the information that I could find, at the time, Meteo Frances site was down so I couldnt put down everything. So i put down unknown. If you would care to explain how that is vadalism, id be delighted because I was updating old information from the small amount of information I had, at least it was more current than what was on there. --[[User:INFOWeather1|INFOWeather1]] <small>( [[User talk INFOWeather1|Talk]] )</small> 1:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

== Your geography is failed ==

You always use W for the Eastern Hemisphere in Wikipedia. --&nbsp;[[User:Meow|<span style="color:#FFF;background:#B14;padding:0 3px;font-size:120%">Meow</span>]] 07:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Meow}} Sorry it's a bit confusing as you use W for E. Hem and the other. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 07:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
::I meant the longitude. Why you always use W for a location that is actually E? TC Stan is an example. --&nbsp;[[User:Meow|<span style="color:#FFF;background:#B14;padding:0 3px;font-size:120%">Meow</span>]] 07:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

== Hi ==

Hi [[User:Fun Cake|Fun Cake]] ([[User talk:Fun Cake|talk]]) 23:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

== Tropical Lows ==

Before you ask I RMd both systems due to a lack of evidence that they were Tropical Lows. However, Ive subsquently discovered TCWC Brisbanes Outlook for today and since the system is now in Aus you may add it back in. The Perth System stays out though as we have no evidence that it was anyghing more than a weak low. Regards :).[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 20:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC) [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 20:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Jason Rees}} As I said before, I just wanted to discover about BoM's TLs more and why some aren't discovered with identifiers. Let's just wait for Tatiana or our next designated low (which is expected to form by tomorrow from TCWC Perth) and see what happens. If the next low is given the identifier of 11U, then the TL you rm (the Feb 5 low) and the current low should be 09U and 10U. But as of now, they are just lows. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 05:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

== Follow up ==

To follow up on last weeks conversation both of Tait and Uriah TCRs have been released and both systems formed on the 9th. As a result the Aus Region article has been updated to reflect this.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 23:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
:Cough - 10U=Tait 11U=Winston (Prob) 12U=Unnamed TL. Also can you stop directly citing Ketihs site but instead webcite some of the bulletins and place them on the talk page please.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 12:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Jason Rees}} It's pretty weird, but I saw the sources from Meow and states that Winston re-generated into a TL on the 3rd. Also there was a weak TL from 14-16 Feb. -- [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 19:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
:::As I said my money is on it being Winston, since BoM had to issue formal warnings on it for Norfolk Island and it was expected to reintensify in the Aus region before it did. However, we are just guessing here and if you can prove that Perth reported that a weak tropical low existed then I will allow it to be mentioned in the article. Also since Reunion did not issue any warnings on 12U I would suggest removing the basin crossing crap.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 21:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Jason Rees}} Do we add in weak tropical lows? I know we don't put lows in the article, since they are not tropical. I am sorry that I didn't updated or add the sources to the Feb TL ASAP. If I added them early, I would've added the sources, but now I could not find them. Also true, MFR didn't continue tracking 12U, so therefore we don't need to mention the links to the 2015-16 SWio article. - [[User:Typhoon2013|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Palatino Linotype">''Typhoon2013''</span>]] 02:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
:::We will add in weak tropical lows when we have a source telling us that they were a weak tropical low. Hopefully, for the tropical low that you are on about, {{ping|Keith Edkins}} will be able to recover the Perth TWO's that talk about this system. Once they have been seen I will look at the wording used and then add it in if needs be.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 21:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


== WikiCup 2015 March newsletter ==
== WikiCup 2015 March newsletter ==

Revision as of 09:29, 10 April 2016

Archive
Typhoon2013's Archives

Barnstars
2013 // 2014 // 2015 // 2016 // 2017
2018 // 2019 // 2020 // 2021 // 2022

This is the 5th Archive of Typhoon2013's talk page. Archive 5 includes events during December 25, 2015 - present

If you want to put awards like barnstars, please put them here.

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Connecticut Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions), Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), and New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by There's always time for skeletons Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with Lancashire J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Tropical Low sources

I have put a section for this system directly onto the monthly archive page Talk:2015–16 Australian region cyclone season/February--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 21:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith Edkins: Thank you so much! @Jason Rees: Here you go! :) Typhoon2013 01:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you as always for providing the sources @Keith Edkins: - I honestly dont know what we would do without you and your archiver which is used by a few members of the international community as well as us. Anyway Typhoon2013, I am in two minds about this system - on one hand I can not pick and choose which tropical lows we monitor/dont monitor and you have provided the evidence needed to call it a tropical low. However, I can not help but notice that they did not expect it to develop at all which makes me wonder if it was assigned a U number at all. For now keep it in the article and I will have a chat with a few contacts at the BoM soon.Jason Rees (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Typhoon Koppu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LLCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koppu

Hey there. Please don't copy and paste articles in the future to move articles. Wiki works when we can see the edit history, and by copying it, you destroyed the edit history for the article. I fixed it so the current Koppu article has a continuous history from when it was first made, but please refrain from doing this in the future. If you can't move a page, ask an admin, and they'll be able to do it. There are several administrators in the project, including myself, User:Juliancolton, and User:Cyclonebiskit. (and many others who are retired or semi-retired) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Naming section format

For starters the addition of the retired names have been a source of a dispute, between me and a couple of the other members of the project. As they feel that the facebook source is not reliable enough for various reasons - while I strongly disagree with this, I feel that there are bigger battles to fight. As a result of this I have agreed to a compromise position, where we can keep the article titles without the (2015) but we can not list them as retired until either the final report or a formal press release from the WMO is issued. As for the format of the naming section I feel that we can do a better job with them without too much hassle. For example do we really need to state the JMA or PAGASAs full name two or three times in the same section? As a result that is why I would prefer to see the retired names alongside the section rather than in their own little section. I also do not see the need to have the italics when per WP:Italics they are only used for emphasise of things.Jason Rees (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I RVd it as I do not see the need for the retirement stuff to have a second paragraph. If you really feel that a second paragraph is required - try splitting it before where it goes "The name Nonoy....".Jason Rees (talk) 18:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Scratch that it kinda looks better with two paragraphs.Jason Rees (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I feel happier yeah... But I need to find some time to play with the overall paragraph. As for the international names there is no need for a second paragraph and it will be debatable from year to year if the PAGASA one needs a second paragraph.Jason Rees (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The format looks ok as it goes back but it just needs a few tweaks to ensure that it is sourced up etc as a result dont go further back just yet.Jason Rees (talk) 23:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Pacific typhoon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Typhoon Bilis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14F

TROPICAL DISTURBANCE TD14F CENTRE {1004HPA} WAS ANALYSED NEAR 13.4S 168.3E AT 012300 UTC.Jason Rees (talk) 21:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]