Talk:Gain–bandwidth product: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:26, 13 April 2016

Electronics Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Explanation of the Filled Parameters in the Added WikiProject Electronics Template

I added the WikiProject Electronics template since this article pertains to this WikiProject.

Class: I rated this article as a stub-class article because it has absolutely no sources. According to the WikiProject Electronics assessment page, if an article has no listed sources, it is a stub, regardless how informative, well-written, or long it is. This is simply because such articles are not verifiable, which Wikipedia holds in very high regard. Importance: The article falls we under the description of mid importance from the WikiProject Electronics assessment page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronics/Assessment).

I also added this article to the Electronics portal because I thought it was obviously befitting. --Some Old Man (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the Addition of {{Refimprove|article|{{subst:DATE}}|talk=y}} to the Article Page

Since the article requires sources for verification, I added the template noting in on the article page.

--Some Old Man (talk) 04:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added graph

Added one graph --Petteri Aimonen (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Example changed from "minimum" to "maximum"

I have changed the last example so it reads, "Further, if the <emph>maximum<emph> frequency of operation is 1 Hz, then the maximum gain that can be extracted from the device is 1 x 10⁶" for an op-amp with a GBWP of 1 MHz (emphasis added). That is what the article used to say. On 25 August 2009, someone at IP address 132.68.50.34 changed "maximum" to "minimum." I do not believe this is correct, and no explanation was given, so I changed it back to "maximum." I would welcome a discussion if others think "minimum" is correct. -- WakingLili (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You did good. Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bogosity

I rewrote the lead since what it said was not right in general, using the 3 dB bandwidth. I added one source; it would be good to find more.

I think the theory section is also very bogus. Looks like someone's WP:OR. I think I'll remove it. Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Define everything, please!

For those people who are not electrical engineers, and for any article, please define ALL variables, constants, etc. w (omega) is frequency in radians per second, wc is cutoff frequency in radians per second etc. I think the spirit of these articles should be that a person can just read them cold, without having to already know the jargon! 71.139.173.203 (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why does the image show a low frequency roll off? Op-amps don't have that.

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 I think the spirit of these articles should be that a person can just read them cold, without having to already know the jargon!
 [[Special:Contributions/71.139.173.203|71.139.173.203]] ([[User talk:71.139.173.203|talk]]) 06:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
+== Image ==
+Why does the image show a low frequency roll off?  Op-amps don't have that.