User talk:Iordanis 777/Archive 1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I Do understand what wrong I did.i told I did a stupid vandalism and then I repeatedly dinied it! I don't need to be unblocked to repeat what I did so many years ago. ....this would be sooooo NOT necessary for me if I wanted to do vandalism again. Now about the contributions. ...I don't have the time I had in the past....but let me ask you something....if I made now a new account (after all theese years I have changed my home,my pc and my Internet provider )would you ask me to guarantee a sum of contributions? I ask forgiveness. ...PLEASE REVISE YOUR DECISION.

Accept reason:

After so many years I am willing to believe you are likely to have changed, and give you another chance. I confess that I still have some doubts because of your attempts to lie your way out of the situation, but it will be easy to watch your editing with a view to blocking again if necessary, so I am willing to put those doubts aside. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

If you were unblocked, what edits would you make? And did I miss something, or haven't you edited at all - not at the Greek Wikipedia, not anywhere else - for the past five years? Huon (talk) 12:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes you are right. I haven't. I mean. I did something stupid. And then I dinied it.I don't know what got into me.Anyway I was embarrassed and didn't want to edit in the Greek wiki cause at the timeI knew some guys there. Not that I have much time know I am married and have a kid too.I just wanted to make an apology and not have it in my back. That's all.Thanks anyway. Yamaguchi I Do understand what wrong I did.i told I did a stupid vandalism and then I repeatedly dinied it! I don't need to be unblocked to repeat what I did so many years ago. ....this would be sooooo NOT necessary for me if I wanted to do vandalism again. Now about the contributions. ...I don't have the time I had in the past....but let me ask you something....if I made now a new account (after all theese years I have changed my home,my pc and my Internet provider )would you ask me to guarantee a sum of contributions? I ask forgiveness. ...PLEASE REVISE YOUR DECISION.

Yes, but what edits would you make if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

I don't know. Probably I will start contributing again in the greek version if I will get the opportunity from you by unblocking me....given my limited time to spare. I am a customs officer now and I could contribute in some article about this or the counterfreight or something. ...I don't know. The sure thing is that I will play nice.

Thanks for the opportunity. Again I am very sorry for what I have done. I am very happy. A big deal for me. ...bigger than I expected! You won't be sorry. Iordanis 777 18:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

⇦REDVERS⇨ 14:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Because user Redvers blocked me and I didn't do anything.He gave me a link with the history of the vadalism I am supposed to have done but in that time I never loged in my account.I don't know if my username and password was hacked but if you unblock me I will change them.Thank you.

Decline reason:

Well, looking at your contributions, it's clear that there was vandalism going on. Either it was you (in which case, you won't be unblocked) or your account is compromised (and won't be unblocked). TNXMan 16:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wan't my account to be unblocked because I haven't done the vadalism and I will change my password once the unblock will happen so that nobody else will use it any more.If you won't unblock me I wan't you to either delete my account or rename me because Iordanis is my real name and if you won't give me the opportunity to use my account i don't won't my real name to be there.I can't understand how you act like this like dictators!

Decline reason:

You know, you were SO close, until the part about dictators. Your edits have been nothing but vandalism, and it's always good where you "hide" the evidence for an unblock request. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok.I can't understand you.You decline my request repeatedly and you don't give me a way out of this situation.I haven't told that it is your false that i have been blocked and I am sorry if i offended you but my codes have been stolen and I allready have changed my password and I wan't you if you can't unblock me now to tell me what to do so i can be unblocked.Now if you can't even tell me this please tell me how i can rename my account because i have been allready renamed in the greek progect and if i can't use my account i don't want my name to be in it..it is not to hide because you allready have my ip.AND IF YOU TAKE THE TIME AND SEE IN THE GREEK WIKIPEDIA WHEN I WAS WRITING IN IT I MADE SOME ARTICLES AND ONE OF THEM WAS NOMINATED.So how can you believe me to be vandal.Anyway,thanks and i will be waiting for an answer.Further more I wan't to tell that i am sorry that i wasn't carefull enough and as a result my code was stolen.And if i offended someone by my words it wasn't meant to be like this but i feel that i am not what you accuse me.I just wasn't carefull enough. Anyway I am sorry about every thing because i understand that whichever the cause for the vadalism was and whoever did it it is my fault.I am asking for my account to be unblocked and for the admins that i offended because i lost my temper to accept my apology.

Decline reason:

I don't know what to do with you. You keep dancing up to admitting to the vandalism, then backing away and blaming others. See these pages: WP:BROTHER and WP:GOTHACKED. Understand that our main interest is not in forcing you to apologize but rather in protecting this project from malicious editing. If we are to believe your claims, then someone else had your password for a very long time, with three separate incidents beginning in November of '09, returning on January fifth of this year, and then a final spree on the seventh of January. Before the vandalism there had been no edits from this account for over a year. Of all the accounts on Wikipedia, why you? You hold no special permissions or tools, a vandal wanting to do what you did could have simply created a new account. And then after such a long absence you return just a few weeks after the blocking and begin requesting unblock. Frankly that tale defies belief. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What to say?Ok Beeblebrox you have got a point there...about the little brother thing and how you don't know if i tell the truth or not(but you know i don't have a little brother...but that probably means nothing to you!).I won't appeal again because there is no point in doing this.Any way could someone tell me how i can ask to be renamed?I mean do i have this choice as a blocked user?Thank you.Iordanis777^listening 08:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

You're not helping yourself by removing previous declined unblock requests: they state explicitly: "Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked". Also, we are unrelated to the Greek Wikipedia; your actions there matter not to us. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

I removed them because i haven't notised the warning you mention.I reverted the removal i made. I mention the greek wikipdia as a example of good faith.Thank you.Iordanis777^listening 11:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I did time enough for the accuzation.Thank you.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for your block. There is no accusation, merely a statement of fact: your account was only used for vandalism. As such, I see no reason to believe that the block was incorrect, and no reason to unblock your account. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iordanis 777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to apologise from the whole wikipedia community for the vandalism i caused in the past.Now after all theese years i understand that doing so and then deniing it was totally wrong and ask you if you may to unblock me. Again i am very sorry for all the trouble.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.