Talk:Semantic satiation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:53, 19 May 2016

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This has been mentioned by a media organization:

Megan Gibson (2011-01-14). "Wikipedia's 10th Anniversary: 10 Unforgettable Entries". TIME. Retrieved 2010-01-15. We've all done it, whether it was a part of a meditation ritual or out of plain old boredom: repeated a word over and over again until it lost all meaning.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved. No objections. Aervanath (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page appears to describe the term "semantic satiation", and a quick Google-count shows approx 4:1 usage of "semantic satiation". I suggest "semantic saturation" be renamed "semantic satiation" with an appropriate redirect on the old term. -- 74.137.108.115 (talk) 02:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

seconded --AndreasBWagner (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Paragraph removed

I removed the following uncited paragraph which has been fact-tagged since June. It seems to be discussing an entirely different phenomenon.

The phenomenon was also shown to apply at the macro level by analyzing the life span of popular hit songs as given in weekly charts by trade magazines. Songs that were instant hits, taking only a few weeks to rise to the top, disappeared from the ratings charts faster than songs that took more weeks to rise to the top ten. The explanation was that the fast-rising hit songs get played on the radio more frequently (by all disc jockeys), creating semantic satiation of those songs in listeners more rapidly than songs that are introduced and played gradually.^{[citation needed]}

Comet Tuttle (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Massed negative practice

This seems to be closely related to Massed negative practice, could the two articles share some information? AndreasBWagner (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

language log

Here's a post on the topic: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2833

67.119.12.141 (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture

It seems as though the movie Pontypool would also be a good addition. I'm not doing it myself because this is not my area of expertise, but it did come to mind. Cheers! TwoSpear 01:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/67.119.12.141|67.119.12.141]] ([[User talk:67.119.12.141|talk]]) 10:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
+== Popular culture ==
+It seems as though the movie Pontypool would also be a good addition. I'm not doing it myself because this is not my area of expertise, but it did come to mind. Cheers! TwoSpear 01:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)