User talk:DJ Many56: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:07, 22 May 2016

Nomination of DJ Many for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Many is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Many until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Template:Z81 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with DJ Many. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Many

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DJ Many, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Abhishek ^Talk 17:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not write an article about yourself, as you did at DJ Many. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. — Abhishek ^Talk 17:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as DJ Many, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Template:Z44 — Abhishek ^Talk 17:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Many56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will follow the rules 2605:A601:F204:6400:B5CF:479A:DF05:6812 (talk) 01:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please log in to apply. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Many56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Was Told To Log In To Be Unblocked, I Understand The Rules Now. DJ Many56 (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Could you go into some more detail about which rules you understand now. Also, what edits do you want to make? PhilKnight (talk) 01:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

{{unblock}}

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DJ Many56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Will Be Helping The Creation Of Drafts And Various Pages, I Understand Not To Edit Active Pages About Myself Anymore... DJ Many56 (talk) 2:10 am, 4 December 2015, last Friday (3 days ago) (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

See below. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you been using some other accounts while blocked (like Musicwaxfeen and Supermusicboom)? Vanjagenije (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes— Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Many56 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you to take the WP:Standard offer. Wait for six months without socking, and ask to be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{I Have, It's Been 3 YearsDJ Many56 (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

No, it's been less then 3 months since you was editing using your sock puppet Musicwaxfeen. Standard offer assumes 6 months without any editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

DJ Many56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Was Told To Wait 6 Months For A Unblock, The Time Has Passed And I Am Submitting Now.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I Was Told To Wait 6 Months For A Unblock, The Time Has Passed And I Am Submitting Now. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I Was Told To Wait 6 Months For A Unblock, The Time Has Passed And I Am Submitting Now. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I Was Told To Wait 6 Months For A Unblock, The Time Has Passed And I Am Submitting Now. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Have you been using any other accounts to edit while being blocked? Also, can you promise not to write about yourself and the topics with which you are personally connected? Do you understand WP:SPAM and WP:COI? (Please, read those before you say you understand). Vanjagenije (talk) 14:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I Do Understand DJ Many56 (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 {{unblock|1=I Was Told To Wait 6 Months For A Unblock, The Time Has Passed And I Am Submitting Now.}}
 *Have you been using any other accounts to edit while being blocked? Also, can you promise not to write about yourself and the topics with which you are personally connected? Do you understand [[WP:SPAM]] and [[WP:COI]]? (Please, read those before you say you understand). '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<font color="008B8B">Vanjagenije</font>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<font color="F4A460">(talk)</font>]]''' 14:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
+Yes I Do Understand [[User:DJ Many56|DJ Many56]] ([[User talk:DJ Many56#top|talk]]) 14:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)