Jump to content

User talk:DBD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 43: Line 43:
== Sorry for the mishap ==
== Sorry for the mishap ==


Apologies for the Attenborough mix-up. I shall be more thorough and meticulous in my editing next time. Thank you.
Apologies for the Attenborough mix-up (back in '14). I shall be more thorough and meticulous in my editing next time. Thank you.

Revision as of 17:49, 16 June 2016

User talk:DBD
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use section titles when starting new talk topics. Please feel free to speak your mind, but, first and foremost - please: be civil; be polite; and be reasonable.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Kitchin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bishop of Gibraltar
Rodney Eden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sunderland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Uwer:DBD/1770s in Wales, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space. (See section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox honorifics

Hi DBD! Your use of AWB to remove honorific titles from clergy articles has meant that those titles have also been removed from infoboxes and references, in addition to removing those in the main text. This has made references incorrect. Also, titles are fine being included in infoboxes: MOS:HONORIFIC concerns article titles and the first mention (IE right at the start of an article), as you'll see if you look at the table of contents for that page. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 21:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mishap

Apologies for the Attenborough mix-up (back in '14). I shall be more thorough and meticulous in my editing next time. Thank you.