User talk:DBD/Archive 15

Archives

Archive 1 (July 2005 – July 2006)
Archive 2 (August 2006)
Archive 3 (September – October 2006)
Archive 4 (November 2006 – Jan 2007)
Archive 5 (February – April 2007)
Archive 6 (May 2007)
Archive 7 (June – July 2007)
Archive 8 (August – December 2007)
Archive 9 (January – March 2008)
Archive 10 (April – June 2008)
Archive 11 (July – September 2008)
Archive 12 (October – November 2008)
Archive 13 (Dec 2008 – May 2009)
Archive 14 (June 2009 – May 2010)
Archive 15 (June 2010 – January 2011)
Archive 16 (February – July 2011)
Archive 17 (August – November 2011)
Archive 18 (Dec 2011 – January 2012)
Archive 19 (February – March 2012)
Archive 20 (April – July 2012)
Archive 21 (August – October 2012)
Archive 22 (Nov 2012 – March 2013)
Archive 23 (April – July 2013)
Archive 24 (August – November 2013)
Archive 25 (Dec 2013 – April 2014)
Archive 26 (May – October 2014)
Archive 27 (Nov 2014 – May 2015)
Archive 28 (June – October 2015)
Archive 29 (Nov 2015 – April 2016)
Archive 30 (May – November 2016)
Archive 31 (Dec 2016 – July 2017)
Archive 32 (August – October 2017)
Archive 33 (Nov 2017 – July 2018)
Archive 34 (August 2018 – May 2019)
Archive 35 (June – November 2019)
Archive 36 (Dec 2019 – June 2020)
Archive 37 (Sep 2020 – Aug 2021)
Archive 38 (Sep 2021 – June 2022)

June 2010 – January 2011

Prince consort[edit]

Yes, that's the one! --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. --œ ^™ 22:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British monarch categories[edit]

DBD, can we delete Category:Queens regnant of the United Kingdom? It is a small category with little room for expansion, since there are only two and the next four people in the line of succession are men. I'd like to move all the UK monarchs back into the singleCategory:Monarchs of the United Kingdom and add Victoria to Category:Queens regnant instead per WP:SMALLCAT. Thanks.DrKiernan (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me, mate D B D 17:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

template needing your help please[edit]

Template:Hereditary barons of England - Kittybrewster ☎ 08:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of them is linked! Kittybrewster ☎ 10:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are now two English barony templates, one of which I created last night and is linked to each Barony. One needs deleting. There are other templates which are not linked to the relevant baronies (Scotland, Ireland and GB). Kittybrewster ☎ 11:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your templates need to be linked to something. Kittybrewster ☎ 21:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey ... not quite Plantagenet...[edit]

I could deal with the title being named "Geoffrey (bishop)" or "Geoffrey (Archbishop of York)" but neither of the main sources used for Geoffrey's article call him "Geoffrey Plantagent". Both Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and the Handbook of British Chronology give his name as "Geoffrey" alone. Nor does Gillingham in Richard I call him Plantagenet and Warren's Henry II puts the Plantagenet in scare quotes. Might want to rethink the name for that article. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair point. The Wikipedia:Naming conventions (clergy) suggest it should be at Geoffrey (bishop) then. Would you like to?D B D 22:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I never interupt a man on a roll! (grins) Ealdgyth - Talk 22:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Peer[edit]

Hi! Do you remember that, long time ago, I suggested creating an infobox for peers? Well, we now have Template:Infobox Peer... but's hideous! Unfortunatly, the user who created it thinks it's beautiful and considers Template:Infobox Royalty hideous, and I don't want to argue about that (de gustibus non disputandum). He agreed to make at least the title field similar to Infobox royalty's succession field. Unfortunatly, I can't do it no matter how much I tried. Could you try, please? The infobox could be quite useful in so many articles, but it's currently too ugly for me to look at. The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E. F. Benson[edit]

Hi - I notice that a few weeks ago you moved Edward Frederic Benson to Edward Benson (writer). I just wanted to let you know that I've proposed a further move, to E. F. Benson over redirect. I've left a rationale at Talk:Edward Benson (writer). As you were involved in a recent naming decision, I wanted to ensure you had the chance to comment if you felt strongly about it. Regards,Ka renjc 18:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmo Gordon Lang[edit]

Please do not move articles without discussing the potential move at the article's talk page first. Cosmo Gordon Lang is aFeatured Article and represents some of Wikipedia's best and most carefully reviewed work. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. So I was bold (i.e. I did nothing wrong), you reverted, so now let's discuss D B D 16:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Morton (bishop)[edit]

Hi. I don't understand the reasoning behind moving Morton from (archbishop) to (bishop), bearing in mind that he is much better known as Archbishop of Canterbury. I don't see anything in the naming conventions to support this. Deb (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Princess) Henrietta (Anne) of England[edit]

I would appreciate your opinion about the proper name of (Princess) Henrietta (Anne) of England, see Talk:Princess Henrietta of England JdH (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies is now a Feature article nominee[edit]

Hi! Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies has been nominated as possible Featured article. She was an Italian princess and the wife of Emperor Pedro II of Brazil. If're interested on reviewing and voting in favor or not of it, please go to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies/archive1. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Casualty series[edit]

Template:Casualty series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks for deletion[edit]

The article List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Identity Parade guests on Never Mind the Buzzcocks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —HalfPrice 22:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, DBD. You have new messages at Malcolmxl5's talk page.
Message added 22:56, 2 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

HM The Queen listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HM The Queen. Since you had some involvement with the HM The Queenredirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kittybrewster ☎ 20:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]