Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsmax: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Newsmax: K |
m →Newsmax: fixed formatting |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 09:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 09:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 09:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 09:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)</small> |
||
'''Keep''' Promotion is a [[WP:SURMOUNTABLE]] concern, and the article is actually much better than I expected, although apparently uses [[WP:UGC]] a few times. Profiles in the [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/business/media/newsmax-a-compass-for-conservative-politics.html NYT] and [https://next.ft.com/content/780adad6-fe15-11de-9340-00144feab49a Financial Times], among others, satisfy [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 12:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' Promotion is a [[WP:SURMOUNTABLE]] concern, and the article is actually much better than I expected, although apparently uses [[WP:UGC]] a few times. Profiles in the [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/business/media/newsmax-a-compass-for-conservative-politics.html NYT] and [https://next.ft.com/content/780adad6-fe15-11de-9340-00144feab49a Financial Times], among others, satisfy [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 12:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep''' The article documents that it is the most trafficked online conservative website. I don't understand the desire to remove it. It is clearly significant and any promotional items can be corrected. [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> |
'''Keep''' The article documents that it is the most trafficked online conservative website. I don't understand the desire to remove it. It is clearly significant and any promotional items can be corrected. [[User:JodyB|'''JodyB''']]<sub>[[User talk:JodyB| <font color="red">talk</font>]]</sub> |
||
Revision as of 15:21, 7 July 2016
- Newsmax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is too over-promotional. Speedy turned down Atlantic306 (talk) 08:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 09:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 09:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep Promotion is a WP:SURMOUNTABLE concern, and the article is actually much better than I expected, although apparently uses WP:UGC a few times. Profiles in the NYT and Financial Times, among others, satisfy WP:GNG. FourViolas (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep The article documents that it is the most trafficked online conservative website. I don't understand the desire to remove it. It is clearly significant and any promotional items can be corrected. JodyB talk