User talk:Qed237

Reference errors on 10 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:2015–16 Liga I Relegation Round table page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Michail Antonio

I have updated the page with correct information, to which you continually revert back to incorrect information. This is a form of vandalism and to suggest that you can continually remove edits that are CORRECT and anyone who calls that vandalism doesn't seem "very civil" is not tolerable and I will be continuing to update the page in accordance with the correct information. Next time I suggest if you have a problem with an edit, you clearly explain what that problem is if one of your core principles is "to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner". Any further attempt to vandalise the page, Michail Antonio, again without any attempt made to explain your actions will be reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.181.151.9 (talk) 23:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Not sure what you are getting at, but if you want to make changes to a WP:BLP you must provide a WP:RS and also please note that just playing in a position temporary does not make them a regular on that position. For an example I have played all my life in defence, but last week coach tried me as a striker (the other strikers were injured), but that does not make me a striker, I am still a defender. You can threaten me all you want with reports and accuse me for vandalism, but you should be aware that I have been on wikipedia for long and this is not WP:VANDALISM. It is you that risk being caught by WP:BOOMERANG and blcoked yourself for persistent disruptive editing. Qed237 (talk) 00:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

STAMFORD BRIDGE

The architect of Stamford Bridge is not Mahdi Mohammadi - Ghaleni . The real architect is Archibald Leitch. And then it was renewed by KSS Design Group. https://www.chelseafc.com/the-club/history/style/stadium-history.html This is the official site . I do not know edit it , so I ask the help of someone who knows . Sorry for my English — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.45.40.204 (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Now corrected, looks like someone vandalised the article a while back. Qed237 (talk) 00:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Michail Antonio

You are completely wrong. Refer edit, "plays for Premier League club West Ham United as a Winger or Right Back". That is a fact, one you cannot dispute. Your incorrect analogy about a defender who plays as a striker for one game is completely irrelevant. Indeed the edit does not state that the player is a winger OR a right back, it simply states that those are the two positions in which the player in question plays at said club. Do I make myself clear? It appears there's some basic comprehension issues coming from your end, however that will NOT excuse you from inappropriately removing edits that are simply stating factual information. I will be re-editing the page and if I see one more disruptive edit from you without VALID justification, this matter will be taken further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.181.151.9 (talk) 08:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Antonio is a midfielder, and you should not make changes without WP:CONSENSUS. Try and follow WP:BRD. Qed237 (talk) 09:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

{{wikinews}} removal

If the template is faulty with adding extra blank space, please ask someone to fix it. But that because of that; Wikimedia sister projects can't be ignored. I hope you have some good reason to prove the point not needed.
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

What I meant is that when you use it at football pages that has templates or wikitables with a width of 100%, wikinews is first and then the whole table/template is pressed down to be below it. This causes a huge gap between the header and the real content. The wikinews has no use anyway so then it is best just to remove it. Qed237 (talk) 11:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

And how can you justify that that wikinews has no use?
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 11:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

It does not give any additional information regarding the subject. Qed237 (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Do me a favour; please read UEFA Euro 2016: France wins opening match 2-1 vs Romania. Tell me if it doesn't provide additional information.
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

I guess I should add the template again. Let me know where, after the football box template, or after the lineup.
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

They should not be added to these articles. {{wikinews}} says Do not place this template in a section containing columns. and the match templates are built using columns (total width of 100%). These so called "news" only mess up the layout and I could not see any new useful information. Qed237 (talk) 11:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

No denying for below that section. Well, I really wonder where is Payet's cross, or Deschamps's post match comments mentioned on Wikipedia. And so, I will be placing those templates, for the news articles that I have created.
Agastya Chandrakant (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Learn from SVWP!

Learn from Swedish wikipedia, seriously. Inledande omgångar i Svenska cupen 2015/2016 (Round 1 & Round 2). Gruppspelet i Svenska cupen 2015/2016 (group stage). Slutspelet i Svenska cupen 2015/2016 (knockout stage). ALL matches have sources! Goals, matches - audience average is calculated with {{#expr: 1 + 1 + 2}}. It is also the same number of games this year, as last year - 119. The cup has the same format as previous years (after 2011). The number of matches are just as many this year as last year. 79.138.131.11 (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

And you can still not use wikipedia as a reliable source per WP:RS as it is user edited. Qed237 (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Är du, den jävla besserwissern, nöjd nu? Tidigare IP:et hade rätt. Lär av svwp. 94.234.170.155 (talk) 02:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

You can not use wikipedia as source. Qed237 (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Har inte gjort det heller. Har sammanställt resultaten från artikeln, resultaten, som är belagda med källor. Nu får du allt sluta upp med att ljuga. 94.234.170.3 (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

You told me to look at swedish wikipedia for sources, that is not how it works. You can not guideme to a wikipedia pages, which is not a reliable source, and ask me to look at those sources myself. If you edit on wikipedia, you must provide reliable sources directly. And stop with the partial bolding, it is not a way of proper communication. Qed237 (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Personal attacks are not acceptable and last message has been removed. Qed237 (talk) 13:39, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

List of Sweden national football team captains

Hej! Jag har under den senaste tiden arbetat med de här projekten och just nu med fokus på List of Sweden national football team captains. Det hade varit kul att få lite respons på artikeln so far! Jag ska senare skriva en "History"-sektion också och även addera vissa källor. Men vad tycker du om språket, utformning på tabellerna, valet av färger, "Chronology"-sektionen osv? Framförallt är det språket som jag är osäker på då jag inte behärskar all engelsk grammatik och meningsbyggnad klockrent. Ha det bra! // Mattias321 (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@Mattias321: Hej! Kul att höra att du vill ta tag i dessa artiklar. Jag är ganska upptagen, men kan nog hitta lite tid för korrekturläsning vid behov. Först och främst, vad gäller språket så är det inte heller min starka sida men jag kunde inte se några direkta fel när jag skummade igenom artikeln och det var inget jag "fastnade" på när jag läste utan det var ett bra flyt i texten. Det enda jag funderar på är precis i början, It is fielded by the Swedish Football Association, där jag not skulle säga The team eller nått istället för It och sedan är jag osäker på om fielded är rätt ordval. Sedan är väl SvFF medlemmar både i UEFA och FIFA (bara UEFA nämns), till skillnad från hur det var nyligen för Gibraltar som var med I UEFA (till exempel Champions League och Europa League) men ej FIFA (nu inröstade med Kosovo). Utformningen av "Captains"-tabellen känns bra, men jag funderar lite på "Chronology"-tabellen. Om du kollar t.ex. på List of France national football team captains eller List of England national football team captains så separerar inte dem baserat på mästerskap och jag är osäker på om vi ska göra så för Sverige. Personligen skulle jag nog ha en tabell, med årtal till vänster, nästa column med kapten för de årtalen, och sedan en tredje column med vilka mästerskap spelaren var kapten i. Till sist vad gäller färgerna så är det bara smak och tycke, men jag skulle kika på de färgerna som är i Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/League season och liknande per senaste consensus (används i liga tabeller, match templates och så vidare). Typ grön (BBF3BB) och gul (FFFFBB) eller nått, men som sagt det är vad man tycker personligen. Qed237 (talk) 12:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Sandro Ramirez

Just wanted to tell you that see, I told you that Sandro Ramirez has officialy retired from FC Barcelona now that Malaga FC has bought him and you think I was wrong well, the answer would be no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuisSuazo300 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@LuisSuazo300: The answer is yes. When you made the edit it was completely wrong. Qed237 (talk) 11:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. – PeeJay 17:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@PeeJay2K3: I you just behave and stop being so aggressive against everyone we dont have do give you messages. Multiple editor express concern about your editing. Qed237 (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't mind you sending me a message, just don't do it via a fucking template. Have the courtesy to use your own words, not some shitty boilerplate message. – PeeJay 19:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Disengaging

Hi Qed, seems like it's been an interesting day with that IP - as an uninvited opinion, it might be a good idea to stop replying to them at their talk page and letting them cool off. I can't understand Swedish, but I can imagine that the conversation is unlikely to go anywhere but badly -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@Samtar: Thank you for that suggestion. Actually I was about to stop writing, when I noticed a change in tone and behaviour. Now the discussion is actually fairly calm, but I still intend to keep it short. Sometimes a block can have a miraculous effect quickly. Qed237 (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

No worries, not being able to read the tone (or language!) makes my suggestion slightly moot - it is remarkable how some time to cool off helps bring around the realisation of how insignificant Wikipedia disputes often are -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hypocrisy

You are against users insulting other users, but then you defended a user that insulted me. SLBedit (talk) 19:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@SLBedit: Sorry, I dont follow. What do you mean? Qed237 (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

You know exactly what I mean: Italia2006. SLBedit (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

FC Stal Kamianske

Your recent editing history at FC Stal Kamianske shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
46.200.26.232 (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)