Revision as of 09:06, 10 August 2016

^{user • contribs • count • email • logs • page moves}

This is MelbourneStar's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36: 1 days

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Contents

Bias?

I see you took away my request from Hillary Clinton's talk page. "we don't rely upon extreme right-wing media outlets, like Info Wars, for references." That's like me saying that your authority is moot because your from Australia's extreme left-wing capital. Facts are facts and should be addressed. If it's true it's true and people need to know, so don't censor critical information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.62.128 (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@124.148.62.128: If you continue to make defamatory allegations against a living person on Wikipedia, I'll report you, and you may lose your editing privileges. Best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it's not defamatory? It's not saying "lol hahaha hillary is unwell dont vote for her", it's saying that she has health problems. That's a fact and it's not slanderous, it's perfectly neutral, and for the sake of neutrality it shouldn't be censored. Wikipedia has a whole damned article about the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but that's not slandering Bill Clinton, those are simple facts, AND Bill Clinton is a living person. So what's different here? I feel like you're using your bias to shut down objectivity.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Facts are facts and should be addressed. If it's true it's true and people need to know, so don't censor critical information.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.148.62.128|124.148.62.128]] ([[User talk:124.148.62.128|talk]]) 07:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :{{ping|124.148.62.128}} If you continue to make defamatory allegations against a [[WP:BLP|living person on Wikipedia]], I'll report you, and you may [[WP:BLOCK|lose your editing privileges]]. Best, —[[User:MelbourneStar|<b style="color:#E22">Mel</b><b style="color:#F20">bourne</b><b style="color:#F73">Star</b>]]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>[[User talk:MelbourneStar|<sup style="color:#407">'''''talk'''''</sup>]] 07:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
+But it's not defamatory? It's not saying "lol hahaha hillary is unwell dont vote for her", it's saying that she has health problems. That's a fact and it's not slanderous, it's perfectly neutral, and for the sake of neutrality it shouldn't be censored. Wikipedia has a whole damned article about the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but that's not slandering Bill Clinton, those are simple facts, AND Bill Clinton is a living person. So what's different here? I feel like you're using your bias to shut down objectivity.