Template:Did you know nominations/Mekhala and Kanakhala: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Redtigerxyz (talk | contribs) Reply |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns. The hook is adequately formatted and interesting. However, the hook statement (found in paragraph four sentence one) itself is not cited. Nominator reviewed Kalikho Pul. Everything loooks good, citations look good and/or are accepted in good faith. The hook statement needs a citation and then this will be good to go. [[User:Alexislynn(BYU)|Alexislynn(BYU)]] ([[User talk:Alexislynn(BYU)|talk]]) 22:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC) |
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough, long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns. The hook is adequately formatted and interesting. However, the hook statement (found in paragraph four sentence one) itself is not cited. Nominator reviewed Kalikho Pul. Everything loooks good, citations look good and/or are accepted in good faith. The hook statement needs a citation and then this will be good to go. [[User:Alexislynn(BYU)|Alexislynn(BYU)]] ([[User talk:Alexislynn(BYU)|talk]]) 22:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
::[[User:Alexislynn(BYU)|Alexislynn(BYU)]], Thanks for the review. The ref 1 is for whole para. Copypasted it to relevant sentences.[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 11:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC) |
::[[User:Alexislynn(BYU)|Alexislynn(BYU)]], Thanks for the review. The ref 1 is for whole para. Copypasted it to relevant sentences.[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = "red" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 11:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks good! well done. [[User:Alexislynn(BYU)|Alexislynn(BYU)]] ([[User talk:Alexislynn(BYU)|talk]]) 14:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 14:06, 22 August 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mekhala and Kanakhala
- ... that Mekhala and Kanakhala are described to have severed their heads and danced headless to please their guru?
- Reviewed: Kalikho Pul
Created by Redtigerxyz (talk). Self-nominated at 17:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns. The hook is adequately formatted and interesting. However, the hook statement (found in paragraph four sentence one) itself is not cited. Nominator reviewed Kalikho Pul. Everything loooks good, citations look good and/or are accepted in good faith. The hook statement needs a citation and then this will be good to go. Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 22:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alexislynn(BYU), Thanks for the review. The ref 1 is for whole para. Copypasted it to relevant sentences.Redtigerxyz Talk 11:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Looks good! well done. Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
