User talk:C.Fred

FYI

Incorrigible Troll socks need to be blocked without email or talk page access. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

@BethNaught: Thank you for the heads-up. I hadn't personally seen talk page abuse from this one before, so I didn't revoke talk page access. However, I'll try to remember if (when) the next one shows up. —C.Fred (talk) 21:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Silencer (band)

The article itself contains reliable material and this translated into other wikis and all contain the same information, so I do not see the need to be eliminated. Greetings! Adriel ricardo morales (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adriel ricardo morales: I saw a lot of self-published sources and no assertion of significance or importance. —C.Fred (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Sure , I understand. But this article is translated from the wikipedia in Spanish, Portuguese and Polish. And its content is true. Adriel ricardo morales (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adriel ricardo morales: The guidelines for notability are not uniform. Each language has its own threshold for inclusion. And the article was not deleted because the content was untrue; the article was deleted because there was no coverage of the band in independent sources and no assertion of its significance or importance. —C.Fred (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Of course, now I understand , well I 'll be more careful next time. Thanks again! Adriel ricardo morales (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

brake repair huntington beach

I was in the process of adding more informative content to the page when it was deleted, please review teh more recent edits and reconsider. Emanuelusa63 (talk) 00:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@Emanuelusa63: Brake repair in Huntington Beach would be way too local a topic to be notable if it covered the topic fully. When written about just one company, it's pure spam. —C.Fred (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

ahhh very good then would these type so article be appropriate if I left out the single company reference. I have lots of content about Huntington Beach with specifics on Auto care. Being so close to the ocean its different than auto care say in Iowa. Thanks Emanuelusa63 (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@Emanuelusa63: Please read through WP:Your first article. Again, I have reservations on whether an article on car care in Huntington Beach could ever be notable. —C.Fred (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Phil Ochs suggested correction made by me

Thank you for the input on how to properly cite a source and the proper way to present a correction. I will take your advice and follow the guidelines, as you have pointed out. Thank you for your help. I look forward to becoming a useful and credible member of your editing crew.

Moonlightgraham (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)Richard L. Levine

   BA, MS Ed JD
   Syracuse UniversityMoonlightgraham (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

LonelyHartsClub

Not sure if you were watching (I know you were involved with Mary Katherine Duhon, but did I do anything wrong? Adam9007 (talk) 00:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: I don't think so. The page had been up several hours, so it isn't a really hasty AfD. See also the comment I left at User talk:LonelyHartsClub. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Do you think it's a case of WP:PRAM? Adam9007 (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: Given how they responded to my explanation of the deletion, that's a valid read of the situation. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I forgot to say, there's another page I nominated for deletion: Lili Sepe. It was tagged BLPPROD, and I considered restoring it, but opted to go for normal PROD instead. Did I do anything wrong there? I'm not sure the G7 tagging is in good faith. Adam9007 (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: Nope, it looks fine. I've intentionally not acted on that page, to let other eyes have a look. However, when they put "pls delete my page omg I wanna go home" on their user page, I did delete that under CSD U1. —C.Fred (talk) 00:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I considered tagging it U1 then, but decided to just leave it. It's ironic that it's this sort of behaviour that makes me want to jump ship. I was considering removing the {{considering retirement}} tag from my talk page, but, sadly, it looks like it's gonna be on there for a while yet :(. Adam9007 (talk) 00:57, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Adam9007: I just go for areas that are more drama-free if it gets too bad in one area. I've backed way off from WP:AIV after a few experiences there left a bad taste in my mouth. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose I'd better learn to deal with dramas better if I'm to have any hope of being an admin someday. Adam9007 (talk) 01:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Ted Thompson is a real homeboy

Can you please take care of this... :-) MeowMoon (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@MeowMoon: Dang, I missed the second one. I got the latter but not the former. Both gone now. —C.Fred (talk) 01:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

how to remove the page from which it was redirected

Hi there, thanks for abridging the page title: I'm aware I didn't use the right naming convention.

I would like to know how I could delete the "John Shaw (Painter/Printmaker)". There is no use to preserving this page: it only appears upon google-searching "john shaw painter" or "john shaw painter" along with the real page (the one you baptised) titled "John Shaw (painter)". Basically, I think there should only be 1 search result for this person, not two.

Please let me know if you have suggestions for how to delete this misnamed page.

Treebrainiac (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Treebrainiac: I'm failing to see why it was declined before, there is no history at that page title that needs to be retained, all of it has been moved over to the new title. Technically G7 might apply because you were the one who originally created it at that title, but {{db-error}} should apply either way. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

@Treebrainiac: I had left the link as a courtesy to make sure you found the new page title. Since you found John Shaw (painter), I've deleted John Shaw (Painter/Printmaker). —C.Fred (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

thanks guys Treebrainiac (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear C. Fred can you look at the page that I may have a conflict of interest in. I made a page for a distant relative who is an author and has been mentioned on a few pages already. I do not want to be biased while writing it and if you have any suggestions I'd be happy to fix the page. The page is Moshe Wisnefsky. ---Matthew Wisnefsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew Wisnefsky (talk • contribs) 23:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply at your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 23:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit warning Zootopia

I actually have spoken about this in the talk page of Zootopia and given PLENTLY of sources to prove my claim. This was actually a very recent edit done by another user changing "critically acclaimed" to "postive reviews". This isn't based in fact! And for months pior it has stated "critically acclaimed"! Now how ever there seems to be an effort to make the film seem lesser than what it is. This isn't just! As other films maked the same are not to my knowlage being abused like this.

Thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lennonthefox (talk • contribs) 18:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Thread kept together at your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Mića Jovanović

Either socks or something organised. Doug Weller talk 20:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

maybe not, see my talk page which I'll move to the article talk page. needs more input. 05:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs)

Danny Boy Styles Page

Why are you deleting this page over and over? There is absolutely NO NEED TO DELETE A PAGE THAT FOLLOWS ALL GUIDELINES!? There is only 1 reference and that is to the discography. What else is missing? This unethical and completely disrespectful to the artist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanzadeh1 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

@Alanzadeh1: As I've noted before, the page was not improved at all over the version that the community decided to delete. Criterion for speedy deletion G4 clearly applies. If you disagree, you're welcome to contest the matter at WP:DRV. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Please explain to me why the page was in worst shape than before? this is extremely vague and not constructive. I am merely trying to support Wikipedia by adding useful information but users such as yourself do not help by deleting pages without clearly explaining why. There was only 1 sourced information and that was for his discography. Are you even looking at the page?! The guy who decided to delete the page in the first place has a personal issue with Danny Boy Styles, and he had a level 3 vandalism scoring on his page. Are you ignoring all this?