Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Rinder: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
DYKReviewBot (talk | contribs) m Automatically reviewing nomination: There may be issues which need to be addressed (Problems? Report it.) |
m review misplaced |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* {{DYKmake|Robert Rinder|Ferma}} |
* {{DYKmake|Robert Rinder|Ferma}} |
||
--> |
--> |
||
| ⚫ | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I'm not quite sure about the main hook – although they’re difficult to distinguish the source seems to apply the "British Judge Judy" description to the show rather than the person. I found ALT1 more interesting and it is clearly supported by the source, although perhaps slightly confusing to people who don't know that it refers to a TV judge – or was it the intention that people would have to check the article to find out why he is referred to as a judge when he isn't one? If not perhaps reword it to something along the lines of "that TV judge Robert Rinder is a practicing criminal barrister and not a civil judge?" |
||
<!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot --> |
<!-- Automated review by User:DYKReviewBot --> |
||
| Line 38: | Line 36: | ||
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly></div></div></includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 22:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC) |
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly></div></div></includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 22:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
<!-- End automated review --> |
<!-- End automated review --> |
||
| ⚫ | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I'm not quite sure about the main hook – although they’re difficult to distinguish the source seems to apply the "British Judge Judy" description to the show rather than the person. I found ALT1 more interesting and it is clearly supported by the source, although perhaps slightly confusing to people who don't know that it refers to a TV judge – or was it the intention that people would have to check the article to find out why he is referred to as a judge when he isn't one? If not perhaps reword it to something along the lines of "that TV judge Robert Rinder is a practicing criminal barrister and not a civil judge?" |
||
::Otherwise, length and 5x expansion are fine, hooks meet length and format requirements, article is cited with no close paraphrasing issues (although the two citations to his CV should be replaced or backed up with independent sources if possible), QPQ done. <font color="navy">[[User:January|January]]</font> <small>(<font color="navy">[[User talk:January|talk]]</font>)</small> 16:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC) |
::Otherwise, length and 5x expansion are fine, hooks meet length and format requirements, article is cited with no close paraphrasing issues (although the two citations to his CV should be replaced or backed up with independent sources if possible), QPQ done. <font color="navy">[[User:January|January]]</font> <small>(<font color="navy">[[User talk:January|talk]]</font>)</small> 16:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 22:20, 10 September 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Robert Rinder
- ... that Judge Rinder has been called the British Judge Judy?
- ALT1:... that Judge Rinder is a practicing criminal barrister and not a civil judge?
- Reviewed: Marlowe Memorial
5x expanded by The C of E (talk) and Ferma (talk). Nominated by The C of E (talk) at 07:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This biographical article has been expanded from 838 chars to 4194 chars since 13:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC), a 5.00-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4194 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- Note that this is a biographical article about a living person. All claims must be cited to a reliable source.
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (16.7% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 53 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 71 characters
- ✓ The C of E has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Marlowe Memorial was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure about the main hook – although they’re difficult to distinguish the source seems to apply the "British Judge Judy" description to the show rather than the person. I found ALT1 more interesting and it is clearly supported by the source, although perhaps slightly confusing to people who don't know that it refers to a TV judge – or was it the intention that people would have to check the article to find out why he is referred to as a judge when he isn't one? If not perhaps reword it to something along the lines of "that TV judge Robert Rinder is a practicing criminal barrister and not a civil judge?"
- Otherwise, length and 5x expansion are fine, hooks meet length and format requirements, article is cited with no close paraphrasing issues (although the two citations to his CV should be replaced or backed up with independent sources if possible), QPQ done. January (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)