Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AynuraJafarova: Difference between revisions
→14 September 2016: checking |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
I do not see any logic in [[User:Nsk92]]'s words. Because by this logic, if I had deleted [[User:Nsk92]]'s post and had asked [[User:Boorey1]] to place it in some different place, then [[User:Nsk92]] himself could have been considered to be a sock account. |
|||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
|||
I blanked my article and Afd because I did not want this article discussed any longer. Maybe I did not know the rules. But if [[User:Boorey1]] placed a post in AfD discussions page and [[User:Nsk92]] did not like it, this cannot be a reason for blocking [[User:Boorey1]]'s account (not speaking about [[User:Star the beautyyy]]'s account). |
|||
Please block my account if it is necessary, but do not block two other accounts. They are not mine. As I wrote in Afd page we all work together and are three different persons. Don't block their accounts, only because they shared their opinions on the article I created. |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
Revision as of 17:43, 14 September 2016
Vugaris
- Vugaris (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
14 September 2016
– A checkuser is in the process of checking relevant users.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Star the beautyyy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Boorey1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Vugaris has created an apparent autobiography which is now at AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vugar Ismailov. Early on he created two obvious sock accounts: User:Star the beautyyy made an edit to the talk page of the article, which User:Vugaris, then erased from there, [1], and then the exact same edit [2] was shortly thereafter made by User:Boorey1 to the AfD page. Then I gave a warning to User:Vugaris at his talk page [3] about inappropriateness of creating sock accounts. For a while User:Vugaris did participate in the AfD constructively, but recently he engaged in disruptive behavior such as attempting to repeatedly blank the AfD page, for which he was given a warning by admin David Eppstein. Shortly after that, the sock account User:Boorey1 reappeared with another post, [4]. I feel that, even taking into consideration that User:Vugaris is a newbie and that his feeling have understandably been hurt in this AfD, he has been given more than enough rope here, and that it is time to apply sanctions. I request a checkusuer be run on all three accounts. Nsk92 (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
I do not see any logic in User:Nsk92's words. Because by this logic, if I had deleted User:Nsk92's post and had asked User:Boorey1 to place it in some different place, then User:Nsk92 himself could have been considered to be a sock account. I blanked my article and Afd because I did not want this article discussed any longer. Maybe I did not know the rules. But if User:Boorey1 placed a post in AfD discussions page and User:Nsk92 did not like it, this cannot be a reason for blocking User:Boorey1's account (not speaking about User:Star the beautyyy's account). Please block my account if it is necessary, but do not block two other accounts. They are not mine. As I wrote in Afd page we all work together and are three different persons. Don't block their accounts, only because they shared their opinions on the article I created.