Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AynuraJafarova: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vugaris (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:


====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
I do not see any logic in [[User:Nsk92]]'s words. Because by this logic, if I had deleted [[User:Nsk92]]'s post and had asked [[User:Boorey1]] to place it in some different place, then [[User:Nsk92]] himself could have been considered to be a sock account.
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
I blanked my article and Afd because I did not want this article discussed any longer. Maybe I did not know the rules. But if [[User:Boorey1]] placed a post in AfD discussions page and [[User:Nsk92]] did not like it, this cannot be a reason for blocking [[User:Boorey1]]'s account (not speaking about [[User:Star the beautyyy]]'s account).

Please block my account if it is necessary, but do not block two other accounts. They are not mine. As I wrote in Afd page we all work together and are three different persons. Don't block their accounts, only because they shared their opinions on the article I created.


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 17:43, 14 September 2016

Vugaris

Vugaris (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under AynuraJafarova (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vugaris. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vugaris.

14 September 2016

– A checkuser is in the process of checking relevant users.

Suspected sockpuppets


User:Vugaris has created an apparent autobiography which is now at AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vugar Ismailov. Early on he created two obvious sock accounts: User:Star the beautyyy made an edit to the talk page of the article, which User:Vugaris, then erased from there, [1], and then the exact same edit [2] was shortly thereafter made by User:Boorey1 to the AfD page. Then I gave a warning to User:Vugaris at his talk page [3] about inappropriateness of creating sock accounts. For a while User:Vugaris did participate in the AfD constructively, but recently he engaged in disruptive behavior such as attempting to repeatedly blank the AfD page, for which he was given a warning by admin David Eppstein. Shortly after that, the sock account User:Boorey1 reappeared with another post, [4]. I feel that, even taking into consideration that User:Vugaris is a newbie and that his feeling have understandably been hurt in this AfD, he has been given more than enough rope here, and that it is time to apply sanctions. I request a checkusuer be run on all three accounts. Nsk92 (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

I do not see any logic in User:Nsk92's words. Because by this logic, if I had deleted User:Nsk92's post and had asked User:Boorey1 to place it in some different place, then User:Nsk92 himself could have been considered to be a sock account. I blanked my article and Afd because I did not want this article discussed any longer. Maybe I did not know the rules. But if User:Boorey1 placed a post in AfD discussions page and User:Nsk92 did not like it, this cannot be a reason for blocking User:Boorey1's account (not speaking about User:Star the beautyyy's account). Please block my account if it is necessary, but do not block two other accounts. They are not mine. As I wrote in Afd page we all work together and are three different persons. Don't block their accounts, only because they shared their opinions on the article I created.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments