User talk:Nsk92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7 /Archive 8 /Archive 9

Van Kampen diagram drawing[edit]

Hi Nsk92, I just wanted to ask you how you drew the van Kampen diagram here [1] and if I could do it in a similar way. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.244.105.224 (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

It was a while ago, but as I remember, I drew that figure using Xfig. At the time my office computer had a Linux operating system and running Xfig was not a problem. It is also possible to install Xfig on a Mac or a Windows computer, but that requires a bit of extra work. compared to Linux-based operating systems. Nsk92 (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hi Nsk92, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob13Talk 06:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks! Nsk92 (talk) 11:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hi Nsk92, categories of the article Vugar Ismailov are mainly Azerbaijani-related. If any category is not adequate, I can remove it. Ismailov manages the Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, NAS of Azerbaijan. This is the only journal of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, which is indexed in Web of Science. He also serves as an editor of leading mathematics journals published in Azerbaijan (such as Azerbaijan Journal of Mathematics, etc.). He is also the Azerbaijani scientist with the lowest Erdos number. Thank you for reading. Vmash (talk) 09:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Look, whomever you are: These arguments should have been brought up in the AfD, before the rain of sockpuppetry and other disruption came down. Incidentally, having Erdos number 2 is not an indicator of notability. WP:PROF explicitly says that having a small collaboration distance from a famous researcher, in particular having a small Erdos number, does not make one academically notable. However, the arguments about editorships of journals are serious and substantive arguments, and, had they been brought up in the AfD at the proper time, it is quite possible that the article might have been kept. However, now that it has been deleted, you cannot just keep re-creating it using obvious wp:sock accounts -- it will just be speedily deleted again. The correct procedure in this situation is for the User:AynuraJafarova account to wait until the expiration of the current two-week block on that account. Then, once unblocked, User:AynuraJafarova (while logged in as User:AynuraJafarova ) can place a request at WP:DRV to have the Vugar Ismailov re-created and to specifically raise new notability arguments that were not presented in the AfD, namely the arguments about journal editorships. There will be then a discussion at WP:DRV and if a consensus is obtained to allow re-creation of the article in the mainspace, then the article will be allowed to be re-created. That is the proper procedure to follow in this situation. But, if more new sock accounts try again and again re-create the article in the mainspace, not only will it keep getting speedily deleted, but the User:AynuraJafarova will be indefinitely blocked (instead of the current two weeks block). Nsk92 (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

GScholar question[edit]

Hi, I'm wondering if you could help me figure out the h-index for "Ronald Smelser", as I can see you have expertise in this area (followed here from an AfD discussion). I've been trying to do a draft for a while, and I wonder if he'd qualify under WP:PROF or WP:NAUTHOR. He is the author, with a co-author, of the The Myth of the Eastern Front. Help figuring this out would be appreciated, as Smelser apparently does not have an individual profile on GScholar. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

This is one of those cases where GScholar displayed the results in a particularly unhelpful manner:[2]. First, one needs to disregard the results related the physicist Ronald E Smelser, such items number 1 and 2 in the GScholar search. Another problem here is that for some reason after that GScholar does not display the items in the decreasing order of the citation hits, and one needs to reorder them manually. When I did that myself, for the citation hits related to Ronald Smelser you describe above, I got: 91, 49, 36, 36, 34, 28, 23, 22, 21, 21, 13, 12, 9, 9, 6,..., which gives him a GScholar h-index of 11 (if I did not miss/mix up anything). That's actually quite high for a historian. In general, for someone in the humanities, h-index is not a particularly good indicator of academic notability per WP:PROF and it is better to look at other factors, such as, for example, reviews of books that he has written, library holdings of his books, editorships of journals/books, etc. Still, to the extent you may want to invoke h-index in the context of WP:PROF, a GScholar h-index of 11 is fairly high for a historian. Nsk92 (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Note also that according to this[3] he is a past President of the German Studies Association, which is also confirmed here[4]; that's another indicator of academic notability per WP:PROF#C6. Nsk92 (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Great, thanks for the feedback! K.e.coffman (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Math Powerland[edit]

I'm contesting the deletion. This is not vandalism or a hoax. I'm a newb at editing wikipedia. I am looking for sources to site and plan on expanding the article. Steveengelhardt (talk) 02:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

RfC for page patroller qualifications[edit]

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

discuss for page Bruce Q. Lan[edit]

Hello, Nsk92, the website AADCU Has been exsited for over 10 years, now seems a dead link,but maybe still can trace some log on google, AADCU was a very known web source in the architectural community, now i heard they are in rebuild process, so should I delet the link source in the article about Bruce Q. Lan, please advice... Thanks! Susanzone77 (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello Nsk92. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

PS: A detailed summary/check list has been deliberately not made because that is then all people read and they then do not bother to read the important details. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Just been uploading a page pander rock duo. Having had 500 international interviews it warrants to have a page with details for people

Captain raw (talk) 16:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Nsk92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC[edit]

Hi Nsk92. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter[edit]

Hello Nsk92,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Breaking the back of the backlog
We now have 367 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.
Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

Contesting Deletion of the page on Anisha Acharya[edit]

Hi Nsk92 - As a part of Wikipedia Asia Month, I am participating in Women in Red campaign. Anisha Acharya is an Indian woman with significant achievement that deserves to the mentioned. Day One is not her only short movie and her other works have also been recognized. Thanks! --Parul Thakur (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Harringay Tigers[edit]

You wanted to get in touch? About the review??

Email: The Wikipedia page Harringay Tigers (speedway) has been changed on 27 November 2016 by Nsk92, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harringay_Tigers_(speedway) for the current revision.

Editor's summary: -

Contact the editor: mail: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Nsk92 wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nsk92

HughJLF (talk) 11:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

No, not particularly. I simply reviewed your new article yesterday as a part of doing NPP. Everything looked in order, for a basic stub-class article. Nsk92 (talk) 13:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Ok, great. I had the email I copied above which suggested that I needed to get in touch. I guess it's just a default standard. Thanks for doing the review. HughJLF (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected[edit]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2[edit]

Hello Nsk92,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE


Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Weigh-in Needed from Eds with Science Background[edit]

The issue of "junk journals" has come-up in a scientist-related AfD, e.g. my latest comment. I don't think this is receiving due consideration from many of the panelists, but would appreciate a heads-up in case I'm over-emphasizing this. Thanks. Agricola44 (talk) 20:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC).

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC[edit]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))

mail[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Nsk92. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Despite its fairly high impact factor, the Bulletin of AMS is not comparable to journals like Annals of Mathematics, Inventiones and the Journal of AMS in terms of prestige. Bulletin of AMS is specifically dedicated to publishing expository/survey articles and book reviews, and does not publish original research as such. That's why BAMS has fairly high impact factor: the survey/expository articles published there are frequently used as general background references. Publishing a paper in BLMS provides a useful service to mathematical community, but it is not comparable to publishing a paper in Annals of Mathematics, Inventiones or the Journal of AMS, which only accept papers proving particularly important new mathematical results. Bauer's paper in BAMS is an expository paper on constructive mathematics. Nsk92 (talk) 14:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2[edit]

Hello Nsk92,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
A HUGE backlog

We now have 367 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3[edit]

Hello Nsk92,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 367 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)