Jump to content

User talk:GermanJoe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
External_link_removed in Continent Page: re - URL should not be added, please use article talkpage
No edit summary
Line 298: Line 298:


:Hello {{ping|Nitsnitz}}, if you disagree with the deletion, please add to the discussion at [[Talk:Continent]] to allow other editors to join in as well. The result of such disputed questions is based on [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] ''among all interested editors'', not on my (or your) single opinion. Thus a user talkpage is not the best place to discuss this. Several other editors have already expressed agreement to remove the link though (by removing it themselves or posting to the [[WP:HD|help desk]] thread). Please add any further arguments to the opened thread at [[Talk:Continent]] (it's not necessary to quote all guideline points again, as most regular editors know about these restrictions for external links). Thank you. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe#top|talk]]) 17:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
:Hello {{ping|Nitsnitz}}, if you disagree with the deletion, please add to the discussion at [[Talk:Continent]] to allow other editors to join in as well. The result of such disputed questions is based on [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] ''among all interested editors'', not on my (or your) single opinion. Thus a user talkpage is not the best place to discuss this. Several other editors have already expressed agreement to remove the link though (by removing it themselves or posting to the [[WP:HD|help desk]] thread). Please add any further arguments to the opened thread at [[Talk:Continent]] (it's not necessary to quote all guideline points again, as most regular editors know about these restrictions for external links). Thank you. [[User:GermanJoe|GermanJoe]] ([[User talk:GermanJoe#top|talk]]) 17:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

*Hello...bro...Where are you? [[User:Captain Avenger!|Captain Avenger!]] ([[User talk:Captain Avenger!#top|talk]][[Special:Contributions/Captain Avenger!|contribs]]) 02:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 13:12, 15 September 2016

Welcome!

Hello, GermanJoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Help with Source Check for FAC

Hello, I apologize for the intrusion. I have noticed that you ran a source check for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Millipede/archive1 recently, and I was wondering if you could possibly run one for my nomination as well (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?/archive1). I would be more than happy to help with any other article/nomination if you do the source check. I understand however if you would not like to if you are either too busy or not interested. Thank you in advance either way. Aoba47 (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Aoba47:, if noone beats me to it, I'll try to have a look later or (more likely) tomorrow. If you haven't done so already, it might be a good idea to ask 1-2 more interested editors for a content review or post a reminder on the talkpages of interested projects. As long as you phrase such requests neutrally, there is nothing wrong with asking for additional reviews. Officially there is no fix number of course and every nomination is different, but 3 supports with some in-depth responses is generally a good number to aim for. GermanJoe (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice, and I will definitely follow it. I apologize for the inconvenience. I always feel really awkward when asking people for help. I greatly appreciate your support, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to help you to return the favor. Aoba47 (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Aoba47:, regarding your question about a full review (I answer here, as I don't want to distract your nomination's page with too much of my own chatter): I rarely do full content reviews as I am not a native English speaker. While I am reasonably sure about everyday conversations, the finer points of complex English grammar and good prose often elude me - so I focus on "technical" image and source reviews. Aside from that, I know next to nothing about the series and episode in question. It would be better if a native speaker interested in the topic would do a more qualified full review. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I completely understand. Thank you for your help again! Aoba47 (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Media check on FAC

Hey GermanJoe, sorry for constantly interrupting you, but can you do another media check on Ride the Lightning? I've nominated it again for FA, and apart from the new picture in the background section, there's nothing new regarding audio files and other images. Here's the FAC and hope you can do the check. Have a nice day.--Retrohead (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Retrohead: And done :) - good luck with your nomination. GermanJoe (talk) 10:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review - GoT

Hi GermanJoe, I hope everything is fine. I was wondering if you have the time.. could you take up(look at/review) the "Peer review" for Battle of the Bastards(Season 6, Episode 9 of Game of Thrones ("Spoiler alert if you have not seen the series")). I am trying to get this to a "Featured Artice".. (It has already been passed for "Good Article") and I need some one to review and tell me what to fix/do to make that happen.(Wikipedia:Peer review/Battle of the Bastards/archive1) AffeL (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @AffeL:, although series articles aren't my strong suit, I have added a few - hopefully helpful - comments. GermanJoe (talk) 13:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review for The Ecstatic?

Hi. I noticed your name at the FAC talk page's source review requests section and would like to ask if you could do one for my FA nomination of The Ecstatic. Dan56 (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done mostly OK, just 1 open point, and a piece of opinion not affecting the review itself. GermanJoe (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Joe,

Hope You are doing well,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Continent#External_link_removed

You have removed my link from "external links" from continent page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent

Reasons you have mentioned are:

  1. 1 - Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article.
  2. 11 - Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)

Possibly #2 - Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting.


  1. 1 Explanation - The variety and metrics provided in our page is unique, you will not find such information at one place. Like GDP of continents etc.
  2. 11 Explanation - This is not a blog, not a personal web page, and nor a fansite. We are new on internet but our aim is to provide current, credible and consistent information to users.
  3. 2 Explanation - As i have already explained that our information is current, credible and consistent. We are not misleading the users and all the factual data and figures we are providing is updated and accurate.

Actually i have not placed the link again, it was Wikipedia Editor "VarunFEB2003" who had placed my link over there (in External Links).

Hope you will find explanation satisfactory and will place my link there again. Please place my link there and it is my job to regulate and update the content on regular basis and i will do it on immediate basis.

Have a nice day !!!

Nitsnitz (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Nitsnitz:, if you disagree with the deletion, please add to the discussion at Talk:Continent to allow other editors to join in as well. The result of such disputed questions is based on consensus among all interested editors, not on my (or your) single opinion. Thus a user talkpage is not the best place to discuss this. Several other editors have already expressed agreement to remove the link though (by removing it themselves or posting to the help desk thread). Please add any further arguments to the opened thread at Talk:Continent (it's not necessary to quote all guideline points again, as most regular editors know about these restrictions for external links). Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]