Jump to content

User talk:GermanJoe/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 10

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review - GoT

Hi GermanJoe, I hope everything is fine. I was wondering if you have the time.. could you take up(look at/review) the "Peer review" for Battle of the Bastards(Season 6, Episode 9 of Game of Thrones ("Spoiler alert if you have not seen the series")). I am trying to get this to a "Featured Artice".. (It has already been passed for "Good Article") and I need some one to review and tell me what to fix/do to make that happen.(Wikipedia:Peer review/Battle of the Bastards/archive1) AffeL (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello @AffeL:, although series articles aren't my strong suit, I have added a few - hopefully helpful - comments. GermanJoe (talk) 13:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Source review for The Ecstatic?

Hi. I noticed your name at the FAC talk page's source review requests section and would like to ask if you could do one for my FA nomination of The Ecstatic. Dan56 (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Done mostly OK, just 1 open point, and a piece of opinion not affecting the review itself. GermanJoe (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

16:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Joe,

Hope You are doing well,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Continent#External_link_removed

You have removed my link from "external links" from continent page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent

Reasons you have mentioned are:

  1. 1 - Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article.
  2. 11 - Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)

Possibly #2 - Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting.


  1. 1 Explanation - The variety and metrics provided in our page is unique, you will not find such information at one place. Like GDP of continents etc.
  2. 11 Explanation - This is not a blog, not a personal web page, and nor a fansite. We are new on internet but our aim is to provide current, credible and consistent information to users.
  3. 2 Explanation - As i have already explained that our information is current, credible and consistent. We are not misleading the users and all the factual data and figures we are providing is updated and accurate.

Actually i have not placed the link again, it was Wikipedia Editor "VarunFEB2003" who had placed my link over there (in External Links).

Hope you will find explanation satisfactory and will place my link there again. Please place my link there and it is my job to regulate and update the content on regular basis and i will do it on immediate basis.

Have a nice day !!!

Nitsnitz (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Nitsnitz:, if you disagree with the deletion, please add to the discussion at Talk:Continent to allow other editors to join in as well. The result of such disputed questions is based on consensus among all interested editors, not on my (or your) single opinion. Thus a user talkpage is not the best place to discuss this. Several other editors have already expressed agreement to remove the link though (by removing it themselves or posting to the help desk thread). Please add any further arguments to the opened thread at Talk:Continent (it's not necessary to quote all guideline points again, as most regular editors know about these restrictions for external links). Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for a Source Review

Hello! I apologize for inconvenience again, and thank you again for your help with my previous FAC. I was wondering if you could possibly help me again for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chad Harris-Crane/archive1. I would be more than happy to help with any other article/nomination if you do the source check. I understand however if you would not like to if you are either too busy or not interested. Thank you in advance either way. Aoba47 (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Done - see FAC-page. GermanJoe (talk) 16:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

RfC for page patroller qualifications

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #3—2016

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletterSubscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia

Did you know?

Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?

Screenshot showing a dropdown menu with options for editing the table structure

Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.

Recent changes

  • You can now set text as small or big.[54]
  • Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[55] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[56]
  • Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[57]
  • At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[58]
  • The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[59] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
  • Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[60]

Future changes

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

16:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ATS. Ike Altgens is a Featured article candidate. I hope you have a few moments to check this article against the criteria so I may address any concerns and see this nomination through. My thanks in advance. —ATS  talk 21:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello @ATS:, I'll probably won't have time for a thorough review. And, aside from commonly known basics, that controversial part of American history is mostly unknown for me as German. It would be difficult for me to fairly assess content-related criteria. Regardless of my ignorance, it looks like an interesting topic - good luck with your nomination. GermanJoe (talk) 07:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

You're saying...

"Its occasional usage does not violate the relevant MOS guidance at MOS:GNL." Why?? Georgia guy (talk) 15:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

I already gave you my reasoning on your talkpage. But to elaborate a bit more: afaik there is no general consensus among scholars and experts to ban terms like "mankind" or "man-made" from encyclopedic language. In fact the term is routinely used in modern literature; the objection from a minority of authors and feminists does not dictate acceptable language in general. If you want to ban such terms completely, you should provide clear proof from unbiased experts, that they are unsuitable for modern encyclopedic usage. Without such evidence to the contrary, all common terms are OK to use. Edits and editing style should be based on what is commonly acceptable, not on personal preferences or minority views (see also WP:NOTCENSORED). I hope that clarifies my view a bit, but further discussion is probably pointless. As I already mentioned, I won't edit-war about a relatively minor detail anyway. GermanJoe (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 08:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Question

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

19:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

XgenPlus Enterprise Email

Sir, I want to know why my page with the title "XgenPlus Enterprise Email" has been deleted as I have given all the valid citations in this page. I have written, what I have heard in the news and read in the newspapers. The world should know that it is the only email service provider that is offering email address in regional languages (World's first IDN complaint email service provider). As per my knowledge I have followed each and every guideline of wikipedia. I think by mistake my page has been deleted or if you think that I have broken any policy or rule of wikipedia then please let me know and guide me.Jaisskaur (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Jaisskaur:, while I was fixing some problematic parts of these articles, I didn't comment at the deletion discussion for this specific article. You can find this discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XgenPlus Enterprise Email. As I don't have access to the deleted article (only administrators can see deleted versions afaik), I can't tell you exactly what was wrong with the article. In general, the usual reasons for deletion in such discussions is the lack of independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage and/or overly promotional content. But if you need more specific details, I suggest you ask the deleting administrator. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GermanJoe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC

Hi GermanJoe. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

21:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Question about Source Review

Hello, I hope that you are having a wonderful day so far. I apologize for the intrusion, but I was wondering if you could help me with my FAC for Love, Inc. (TV series) by providing a source review. I understand that it is a busy time of the early, so it is perfectly okay if you are either unable to or not interested in doing so. I would greatly appreciate your help, but thank you either way (and for helping me with my last FAC). Aoba47 (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Aoba47, I am sorry but I probably won't have time for a full detailed source review. It seems like some of the content reviewers in the current FAC already took a brief look into the references and commented on sources in general. Maybe one of them could provide a bit more detailed check, as they are already familiar with the article and its references. GermanJoe (talk) 11:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. I hope you have a great rest of your day! Aoba47 (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

19:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 16:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

January 2017

Hi, sorry for the revision 757858064 on Comparison of project management software. I just came across the product, so I thought I add it in Wikipedia, and I did'nt see the instructions. Anyway, thank you for reverting the edit and letting me know about the instructions there on the top. Neerajor (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)