Talk:Level 3 Communications: Difference between revisions
→Comcast dispute: NPOV |
→ambiguous sentence: new section |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::NPOV rewrite of Comcast dispute. Readers can click on citations for details. [[User:Cotton2|Cotton2]] ([[User talk:Cotton2|talk]]) 17:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC) |
::NPOV rewrite of Comcast dispute. Readers can click on citations for details. [[User:Cotton2|Cotton2]] ([[User talk:Cotton2|talk]]) 17:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
== ambiguous sentence == |
|||
"...and a few months later, was accused of tapping connections between Google and Yahoo data centers." |
|||
At least for me, when I read that, it sounded like the NSA was tapping communications between google and yahoo, while what was actually happenning was that they were tapping communications between various google DCs and communications between various yahoo DCs. I'm not quite sure how to fix that sentence though. |
|||
[[User:Hintss|hintss]] ([[User talk:Hintss|talk]]) 06:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:00, 30 September 2016
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Undo of Apple IOS reference
it may be true that Level 3 network is used for iOS content distribution, but the reference only supports "music and video" so changing music to ios was undone. Please add a better citation for the iOS statement. --TcomptonMA 19:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TcomptonMA (talk • contribs)
Recent removals in the 'disputes' section
User Thor21 removed in a short period of time 3,792 and 668 bytes at 02/05/14. Is there a reason to remove this unpleasant information about this company, even if it's 3 years ago? --134.184.122.210 (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC) EDIT: forgot to login; this was me --Rubdos (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Comcast dispute
The Comcast dispute reads like a PR battle between the two companies, giving undue weight for an article about the company. That section is more than the rest of the entire article. It could be consolidated into about two paragraphs, about right for this article. I wouldn't want to read every year's financial reports in the Finance section either. The two companies have resolved the dispute, it's not encyclopedic to continue the battle in Wikipedia.Cotton2 (talk) 06:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. The Finance section could be removed, and the Comcast dispute section is much too long. Ttwaring (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- I've removed the Finance section. Ttwaring (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- NPOV rewrite of Comcast dispute. Readers can click on citations for details. Cotton2 (talk) 17:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
ambiguous sentence
"...and a few months later, was accused of tapping connections between Google and Yahoo data centers." At least for me, when I read that, it sounded like the NSA was tapping communications between google and yahoo, while what was actually happenning was that they were tapping communications between various google DCs and communications between various yahoo DCs. I'm not quite sure how to fix that sentence though.
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Colorado articles
- Unknown-importance Colorado articles
- WikiProject Colorado articles
- WikiProject United States articles