Talk:Performic acid: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m clean up, replaced: {{chemicals|class=Start|importance=Mid}} → {{WikiProject Chemicals|class=start|importance=mid}} using AWB |
→"This does not make sense"??: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Chemicals|class=start|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Chemicals|class=start|importance=mid}} |
||
{{dyktalk|23 January|2011|entry=... that '''[[performic acid]]''' explodes upon rapid heating to about {{Nowrap|80 °C}}?}} |
{{dyktalk|23 January|2011|entry=... that '''[[performic acid]]''' explodes upon rapid heating to about {{Nowrap|80 °C}}?}} |
||
== "This does not make sense"?? == |
|||
The article says: "Aqueous solutions (up to 90%) can be prepared... This does not make sense." |
|||
If it doesn't make sense, it should be removed. No need to make a statement then contradict it. If the point is to disprove a common claim, this could be rephrased as "Despite common claims of aqueous preparations of 90% performic acid, the maximum synthesized strength is X% because...". |
|||
[[User:Piojo|Piojo]] ([[User talk:Piojo|talk]]) 02:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:58, 6 October 2016
Chemicals Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Performic acid appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
"This does not make sense"??
The article says: "Aqueous solutions (up to 90%) can be prepared... This does not make sense."
If it doesn't make sense, it should be removed. No need to make a statement then contradict it. If the point is to disprove a common claim, this could be rephrased as "Despite common claims of aqueous preparations of 90% performic acid, the maximum synthesized strength is X% because...".