Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hypes: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Seanhaley1 (talk | contribs) →Andrew Hypes: keep |
Seanhaley1 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete as it stands''' NMUSIC #1 requires actual decent RS coverage, and so does keeping it as a BLP - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 09:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete as it stands''' NMUSIC #1 requires actual decent RS coverage, and so does keeping it as a BLP - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 09:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Lacks <i>significant<i> coverage. Majority of the sources appear to be the same insignificant regional community newspaper/site. The IBM site solicits self-generated content that endorse IBM products. The only decent source appears to be Respect magazine, but that's only one, which is not enough. The subject (not the article) may be a case of WP:TOO SOON. [[User:ShelbyMarion|ShelbyMarion]] ([[User talk:ShelbyMarion|talk]]) 01:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Lacks <i>significant<i> coverage. Majority of the sources appear to be the same insignificant regional community newspaper/site. The IBM site solicits self-generated content that endorse IBM products. The only decent source appears to be Respect magazine, but that's only one, which is not enough. The subject (not the article) may be a case of WP:TOO SOON. [[User:ShelbyMarion|ShelbyMarion]] ([[User talk:ShelbyMarion|talk]]) 01:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Per above, it would be delete but he has been featured in very credible magazines. I did a quick Google search and found some. Succeeds [[WP:gng]]. [[User:seanhaley1|seanhaley1]] ([[User talk: |
*'''Keep''' Per above, it would be delete but he has been featured in very credible magazines. I did a quick Google search and found some. Succeeds [[WP:gng]]. [[User:seanhaley1|seanhaley1]] ([[User talk:Seanhaley1|talk]]) 23:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 03:53, 6 October 2016
- Andrew Hypes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage to meet MUSICBIO or GNG. Coverage is a single local paper and social media. JbhTalk 02:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. JbhTalk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. JbhTalk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Subject meets 1 & 10 of WP:MUSIC for producing music for television show. Has significant coverage from independent, secondary sources. Passes WP:GNG. –haggforlife (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as it stands NMUSIC #1 requires actual decent RS coverage, and so does keeping it as a BLP - David Gerard (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks significant coverage. Majority of the sources appear to be the same insignificant regional community newspaper/site. The IBM site solicits self-generated content that endorse IBM products. The only decent source appears to be Respect magazine, but that's only one, which is not enough. The subject (not the article) may be a case of WP:TOO SOON. ShelbyMarion (talk) 01:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, it would be delete but he has been featured in very credible magazines. I did a quick Google search and found some. Succeeds WP:gng. seanhaley1 (talk) 23:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)