Jump to content

User talk:Mulaj: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎October 2016: new section
Line 18: Line 18:


Care to weigh in on [[Talk:Axis:_Bold_as_Love#RfC:_Should_hard_rock.2C_jazz.2C_and_rhythm_.26_blues_be_kept_in_the_infobox.3F|this RfC]] regarding genres at ''[[Axis: Bold as Love]]''? [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 23:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Care to weigh in on [[Talk:Axis:_Bold_as_Love#RfC:_Should_hard_rock.2C_jazz.2C_and_rhythm_.26_blues_be_kept_in_the_infobox.3F|this RfC]] regarding genres at ''[[Axis: Bold as Love]]''? [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 23:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

== October 2016 ==

Please using citation template:

<code><nowiki><ref>{{cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |accessdate= }}</ref>
</nowiki></code>

[[Special:Contributions/123.136.112.36|123.136.112.36]] ([[User talk:123.136.112.36|talk]]) 05:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:04, 6 October 2016

April 2016

Don't post phony warnings on my talk page, or any other editor's. I am completely unimpressed when someone with a handful of edits contests an edit of mine by reverting without a meaningful edit summary and placing a completely unfounded, similarly unexplained warning template on my talk page. Telling me to "familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines", even though I have been editing here since 2006 and have roughly 200 times as many edits as you do, makes it impossible for me (or any reasonable user, I suspect) to take you seriously, and edit summaries where you without provocation call another editor "dumbass" [1] or "you ignorant fool" [2] hardly suggest an interest in rational discussion. I see no reason to give your opinions any weight right now. If you want the context regarding those clickbait lists to be retained, provide evidence that third parties treat them as reliable and substantial under WP:RS. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The last picture was fine you do not have a valid reason to change the wiki picture"

A sincere belief that one is improving an article is a valid reason to perform an edit. Likewise, your apparent disagreement with that assessment is a valid reason to undo the change. At such time, there's no need to challenge a good-faith opinion's validity, which comes across as hostile and is likely to provoke unnecessary conflict. A polite explanation is considerably more prudent. —David Levy 03:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution, but blanking leaves the blanked page. Please ask for the deletion. Maybe you mean that there are two Million songs, so a redirect should be created.Xx236 (talk) 08:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aaliyah songs

As I said in several of my edit summaries, genres required sources per WP:V, WP:OR and WP:SUBJECTIVE. You cannot restore them unless you can provide a reliable source. Also please provide an appropriate edit summary, instead of leaving it blank as if it was vandalism (which is not). Thanks. Synthwave.94 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Care to weigh in on this RfC regarding genres at Axis: Bold as Love? Dan56 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please using citation template:

<ref>{{cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |accessdate= }}</ref>

123.136.112.36 (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]