User talk:Mulaj

April 2016

Don't post phony warnings on my talk page, or any other editor's. I am completely unimpressed when someone with a handful of edits contests an edit of mine by reverting without a meaningful edit summary and placing a completely unfounded, similarly unexplained warning template on my talk page. Telling me to "familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines", even though I have been editing here since 2006 and have roughly 200 times as many edits as you do, makes it impossible for me (or any reasonable user, I suspect) to take you seriously, and edit summaries where you without provocation call another editor "dumbass" [1] or "you ignorant fool" [2] hardly suggest an interest in rational discussion. I see no reason to give your opinions any weight right now. If you want the context regarding those clickbait lists to be retained, provide evidence that third parties treat them as reliable and substantial under WP:RS. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The last picture was fine you do not have a valid reason to change the wiki picture"

A sincere belief that one is improving an article is a valid reason to perform an edit. Likewise, your apparent disagreement with that assessment is a valid reason to undo the change. At such time, there's no need to challenge a good-faith opinion's validity, which comes across as hostile and is likely to provoke unnecessary conflict. A polite explanation is considerably more prudent. —David Levy 03:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Million (song)

Thank you for your contribution, but blanking leaves the blanked page. Please ask for the deletion. Maybe you mean that there are two Million songs, so a redirect should be created.Xx236 (talk) 08:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aaliyah songs

As I said in several of my edit summaries, genres required sources per WP:V, WP:OR and WP:SUBJECTIVE. You cannot restore them unless you can provide a reliable source. Also please provide an appropriate edit summary, instead of leaving it blank as if it was vandalism (which is not). Thanks. Synthwave.94 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Axis: Bold as Love

Care to weigh in on this RfC regarding genres at Axis: Bold as Love? Dan56 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please using citation template:

<ref>{{cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |accessdate= }}</ref>

123.136.112.36 (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mulaj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: House of Music

Hello. Would you care to review or comment at my nomination of House of Music for featured status? The previous nomination did not gather enough commentary, so anything at all would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aaliyah album sales

Hello. I appreciate your frustration, especially as under WP:BRD those additions should have been discussed. To that end, I have created a section on the discography Talk page here. Karst (talk) 08:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mulaj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Just letting you know, not my idea. {{u|zchrykng}} ^{T|C} 22:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mulaj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]