Bombus magnus: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 143.67.103.28 (talk) to last version by Ruff tuff cream puff |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.6) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Another method of species identification is to compare the labial gland secretions of the males. The secretions of ''B. magnus'' and the [[sympatry|sympatric]] ''B. cryptarum'' both contain ethyl dodecanoate, suggesting they may be closely related.<ref name=bert>Bertsch, A., & Schweer, H. (2012). [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197811002110 Male labial gland secretions as species recognition signals in species of ''Bombus''.] ''Biochemical Systematics and Ecology'', 40, 103-111.</ref> |
Another method of species identification is to compare the labial gland secretions of the males. The secretions of ''B. magnus'' and the [[sympatry|sympatric]] ''B. cryptarum'' both contain ethyl dodecanoate, suggesting they may be closely related.<ref name=bert>Bertsch, A., & Schweer, H. (2012). [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197811002110 Male labial gland secretions as species recognition signals in species of ''Bombus''.] ''Biochemical Systematics and Ecology'', 40, 103-111.</ref> |
||
Certain [[restriction fragment length polymorphism]]s (RFLP) in the [[mitochondrial DNA]] of ''B. magnus'' and its close relatives have been analyzed, revealing unique patterns that differentiate them from each other.<ref name=murray>Murray, T. E., et al. (2008). [https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofBiologicalSciences/People/DrRJPaxton/SelectedPublications/PDFs/Filetoupload,126665,en.pdf Cryptic species in a widespread bumble bee complex revealed using mitochondrial DNA RFLPs.] ''Conservation Genetics'' 9 653-666.</ref> |
Certain [[restriction fragment length polymorphism]]s (RFLP) in the [[mitochondrial DNA]] of ''B. magnus'' and its close relatives have been analyzed, revealing unique patterns that differentiate them from each other.<ref name=murray>Murray, T. E., et al. (2008). [https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofBiologicalSciences/People/DrRJPaxton/SelectedPublications/PDFs/Filetoupload,126665,en.pdf Cryptic species in a widespread bumble bee complex revealed using mitochondrial DNA RFLPs.] {{wayback|url=https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofBiologicalSciences/People/DrRJPaxton/SelectedPublications/PDFs/Filetoupload,126665,en.pdf |date=20140404062801 }} ''Conservation Genetics'' 9 653-666.</ref> |
||
==Habitat== |
==Habitat== |
Revision as of 17:49, 5 November 2016
Bombus magnus | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Subphylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | B. magnus
|
Binomial name | |
Bombus magnus Vogt, 1911
| |
Synonyms | |
|
Bombus magnus is a species of bumblebee. It is native to Europe.[1] It is known by the common name northern white-tailed bumblebee.[2]
Systematics
This species is very similar to the white-tailed bumblebee (B. lucorum), the buff-tailed bumblebee (B. terrestris), and the cryptic bumblebee (B. cryptarum). They are difficult to identify, even by experts, and several methods have been used to differentiate them. Computer software has been used to identify patterns.[3]
A diagnostic feature of species is the sensillum placodeum on the antennae.[4] With respect to the sensillum, if there is a different morphology, then it is likely that these two or more species are different from one another based on phylogenetic speciation. Another problem is discerning a difference between species. “Cryptic species are those that satisfy an accepted concept of species, but which are closely similar or identical in morphology.”[5] Many times, a specimen will be classified a member of a species based on its similarities to another member of that species. In the case of B. magnus, several taxonomists have argued that it is part of a long-ignored species, or really part of another species and was misidentified. Several species in the subgenus Bombus may actually be species complexes.[5] B. magnus, B. lucorum, and B. cryptarum are referred to as the "white-tailed bumblebee complex".[6]
Another method of species identification is to compare the labial gland secretions of the males. The secretions of B. magnus and the sympatric B. cryptarum both contain ethyl dodecanoate, suggesting they may be closely related.[7]
Certain restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) in the mitochondrial DNA of B. magnus and its close relatives have been analyzed, revealing unique patterns that differentiate them from each other.[8]
Habitat
This species occurs in many types of habitat, especially upland heath and moorland.[1]
Conservation
This species is expected to be impacted by climate change.[1]
See also
References
- ^ a b c Rasmont, P., et al. 2015. Bombus magnus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 08 March 2016.
- ^ Bombus (Bombus) magnus Vogt, 1911. National Biodiversity Network.
- ^ Arbuckle, T., et al. (2001). Biodiversity informatics in action: identification and monitoring of bee species using ABIS. In: Proc. 15th Int. Symp. Informatics for Environmental Protection (Vol. 1, pp. 425-430).
- ^ Richerson, J.V., Borden, J.H., Hollingdale, J. (1972). Morphology of a unique sensillum placodeum on the antennae of Coiliodes brunneri (Hymenoptera:Braconidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 50(7):909-913.
- ^ a b Williams, P. H., et al. (2012). Unveiling cryptic species of the bumblebee subgenus Bombus s. str. worldwide with COI barcodes (Hymenoptera: Apidae). 'Systematics and Biodiversity 10(1) 21-56.
- ^ Bumblebee Maths. The Bumblebee Conservation Trust. 22 November 2013.
- ^ Bertsch, A., & Schweer, H. (2012). Male labial gland secretions as species recognition signals in species of Bombus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 40, 103-111.
- ^ Murray, T. E., et al. (2008). Cryptic species in a widespread bumble bee complex revealed using mitochondrial DNA RFLPs. Archived 2014-04-04 at the Wayback Machine Conservation Genetics 9 653-666.
Further reading
- Are Bombus lucorum and magnus separate species? BWARS Newsletter 2000(1): 15-17. Reprinted by The Natural History Museum, London.