Talk:Allostasis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:46, 29 November 2016

Physiology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Allostasis is the process of achieving stability, or homeostasis, through physiological or behavioral change. This can be carried out by means of alteration in HPA axis hormones, the autonomic nervous system, cytokines, or a number of other systems, and is generally adaptive in the short term (McEwen & Wingfield, 2003).

If anyone knows how to format the footnotes so there are not all those ghost numbers, please make the changes.Ksvaughan2 15:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Assessment for WikiProject Medicine

Hello. I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reviewed of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:

Assess article with class and importance factors
Is this not a historical medical term?

Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 07:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wingfield 2003 block quote incorrectly attributed?

Was looking at the WIngfield (2003) article but do not find this wording. Might this be from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12614627? Emwhitaker (talk) 20:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *
 Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! [[User:Renaissancee|Renaissancee]] [[User_talk:Renaissancee|(talk)]] 07:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
+== Wingfield 2003 block quote incorrectly attributed? ==
+Was looking at the WIngfield (2003) article but do not find this wording. Might this be from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12614627? [[User:Emwhitaker|Emwhitaker]] ([[User talk:Emwhitaker|talk]]) 20:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)