Contrarian: Difference between revisions
Michipedian (talk | contribs) |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.7.1) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In [[science]], the term "contrarian" is often applied to those who reject the [[scientific consensus]] on some particular issue, as well as to scientists who pursue research strategies which are rejected by most researchers in the field.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} Contrarians are particularly prominent in cases where scientific evidence bears on political, social or cultural controversies, such as disputes over policy responses to [[climate change]], or [[creationism]] versus [[evolution]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} |
In [[science]], the term "contrarian" is often applied to those who reject the [[scientific consensus]] on some particular issue, as well as to scientists who pursue research strategies which are rejected by most researchers in the field.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} Contrarians are particularly prominent in cases where scientific evidence bears on political, social or cultural controversies, such as disputes over policy responses to [[climate change]], or [[creationism]] versus [[evolution]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} |
||
Writers on scientific topics commonly described as "contrarian" include [[David Berlinski]], a critic of mainstream views on evolution,{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} and [[Richard Lindzen]], a critic of the [[scientific consensus on climate change]]{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}. [[Bjørn Lomborg]], who accepts the scientific consensus on climate change but argues against action to mitigate it, has been called "the poster boy of the contrarian trend".<ref>{{cite news |
Writers on scientific topics commonly described as "contrarian" include [[David Berlinski]], a critic of mainstream views on evolution,{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} and [[Richard Lindzen]], a critic of the [[scientific consensus on climate change]]{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}. [[Bjørn Lomborg]], who accepts the scientific consensus on climate change but argues against action to mitigate it, has been called "the poster boy of the contrarian trend".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6591462/Copenhagen-climate-change-conference-2009-climate-contrarians.html |work=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |title=Copenhagen climate change conference 2009: climate contrarians |date=November 25, 2009 |accessdate=February 20, 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140921054232/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6591462/Copenhagen-climate-change-conference-2009-climate-contrarians.html |archivedate=September 21, 2014 |df= }}</ref> |
||
Scientific contrarianism is frequently referred to, favorably, as [[skepticism]] and is criticised as a form of [[denialism]]. An example of the latter usage is [[climate change denial]]ism.{{Citation needed|date=January 2014}} |
Scientific contrarianism is frequently referred to, favorably, as [[skepticism]] and is criticised as a form of [[denialism]]. An example of the latter usage is [[climate change denial]]ism.{{Citation needed|date=January 2014}} |
||
Revision as of 07:03, 30 November 2016
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2015) |
 | This article focuses too much on specific examples. (July 2015) |
A contrarian is a person who takes up a contrary position, especially a position that is opposed to that of the majority, regardless of how unpopular it may be.[1]
Contrarian tropes in journalism
Contrarian journalism is characterised by articles and books making counterintuitive claims, or attacking what is said to be the conventional wisdom (a phrase attributed to John Kenneth Galbraith) on a given topic. A typical contrarian trope takes the form, "everything you know about topic X is wrong".[2]
Supporters and critics
Paul Krugman, an economist and columnist for The New York Times, has criticised "contrarianism without consequences" in relation to the debate over global warming and the controversy over the book Superfreakonomics, saying, "The refusal of the Superfreakonomists to take responsibility for their failed attempt to be cleverly contrarian on climate change is a sad spectacle to watch ... having paraded their daring contrarianism, the freakonomists are trying to wiggle out of the consequences when it turns out that they were wrong."[3]
Contrarianism in science
In science, the term "contrarian" is often applied to those who reject the scientific consensus on some particular issue, as well as to scientists who pursue research strategies which are rejected by most researchers in the field.[citation needed] Contrarians are particularly prominent in cases where scientific evidence bears on political, social or cultural controversies, such as disputes over policy responses to climate change, or creationism versus evolution.[citation needed]
Writers on scientific topics commonly described as "contrarian" include David Berlinski, a critic of mainstream views on evolution,[citation needed] and Richard Lindzen, a critic of the scientific consensus on climate change[citation needed]. Bjørn Lomborg, who accepts the scientific consensus on climate change but argues against action to mitigate it, has been called "the poster boy of the contrarian trend".[4]
Scientific contrarianism is frequently referred to, favorably, as skepticism and is criticised as a form of denialism. An example of the latter usage is climate change denialism.[citation needed]
Contrarian investing
A contrarian investing style is one that is based on identifying, and speculating against, movements in stock prices that reflect changes in the sentiments of the majority of investors.[citation needed]
See also
- Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD)
- Conformity
- Devil's advocate
- Slacker
- Hipster
- Letters to a Young Contrarian by Christopher Hitchens, a noted contrarian
References
- ^ Safire, William (April 9, 1989). "Gun That Rumor Down". The New York Times. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
- ^ Patterson, James T. (November 24, 2012). "Everything you know about the 1960s is wrong". Salon. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
- ^ Krugman, Paul (October 23, 2009). "Contrarianism without consequences". The New York Times. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
- ^ "Copenhagen climate change conference 2009: climate contrarians". The Daily Telegraph. November 25, 2009. Archived from the original on September 21, 2014. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)