Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:23, 30 November 2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not necessary as it is adequately covered in the main article for the crash Adamtt9 (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge To main article of the crash, no need to have several sub articles on this matter Seasider91 (talk) 16:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - no need for separate article —Мандичка^YO 😜 16:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reactions will highly grow durying this week, the original section is too large for the main article and therefor a support article is nedeed to add homages made by several sportmen and international figures such Pope Francis, Lionel Messi, presidents from different countries. It is based on Remember this is the biggest tragedy on football history, a new section is nedeed. Thanks, Bruspek (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - article is useless. - EugεnS¡m¡on 17:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. The material is certainly well documented. Later on it can be decided if it should be merged to the main article. In general air accidents are over covered here, which is probably because they are of such intense interest to people working in the industry and people who fly a lot. I average about 1 round-trip flight a year so I'm not so interested, but who am I to say. "Default to keep" seems to apply. Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:07, 30 November 2016 edit Eugen Simion 14 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,570 edits →‎International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:23, 30 November 2016 edit undo Kitfoxxe (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,508 edits →‎International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	*'''Merge''' - article is useless. - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Eugen Simion 14\|<span style="color:black">'''Eugεn'''</span>]][[User talk:Eugen Simion 14\|<span style="color:gold">'''S¡m¡on'''</span>]]</font> 17:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)		*'''Merge''' - article is useless. - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Eugen Simion 14\|<span style="color:black">'''Eugεn'''</span>]][[User talk:Eugen Simion 14\|<span style="color:gold">'''S¡m¡on'''</span>]]</font> 17:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' for now. The material is certainly well documented. Later on it can be decided if it should be merged to the main article. In general air accidents are over covered here, which is probably because they are of such intense interest to people working in the industry and people who fly a lot. I average about 1 round-trip flight a year so I'm not so interested, but who am I to say. "Default to keep" seems to apply. [[User:Kitfoxxe\|Kitfoxxe]] ([[User talk:Kitfoxxe\|talk]]) 17:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)